VMware’s Chapter 3 outline hinges on a more comprehensive portfolio and multicloud partnerships

TBR perspective

With the looming separation from Dell Technologies (NYSE: DELL) and departure of long-trusted CEO Pat Gelsinger, 2021 has undoubtedly been a turbulent year for VMware (NYSE: VMW). Since effectively taking over as CEO on June 1, Raghu Raghuram has been tasked with executing on Gelsinger’s vision of bringing the same virtualization products trusted by enterprises for decades into the cloud era. As many legacy software companies can attest, capturing net-new business in a market crowding with ‘born-in-the-cloud’ startups is no easy feat; yet, as the company that brought virtualization technology into the mainstream and remains pervasive throughout enterprises today, VMware faces a unique set of challenges and opportunities.

Since starting with stand-alone vSphere license agreements then progressing into full Software-Defined Data Center (SDDC) stack sales, VMware is now entering what Raghuram deems the company’s Chapter 3, the era of hybrid multicloud. Like the first two chapters, Chapter 3 will be defined by product innovation, but it will require a more nuanced partner strategy, leaning on value-added resellers and hyperscalers that will help bring VMware into the cloud. This is an area TBR expects VMware to execute on especially as it enters 2022 as a stand-alone company.

VMware unveils Cross-Cloud Services to drive multiproduct adoption and position as a SaaS company

At VMworld 2020 VMware was coming off a series of tuck-in acquisitions that provided the company additional value in areas like networking, security and modern applications. Evidenced by historic acquisitions, such as VeloCloud, and more recent purchases, including Pivotal, VMware has proven its ability to use acquired IP to quickly pivot and meet demand from customers’ IT operations and development teams. While Gelsinger’s departure and the company’s spinout could be playing a role in slowing acquisition activity, VMware also appears to be at a point where it has all the workings of a competitive portfolio and must now determine how to integrate and scale it. Marking a key step in this direction was the announcement of Cross-Cloud Services at VMworld 2021.

Cross-Cloud Services is a manifestation of the company’s five-pillar framework and brings application, cloud infrastructure, cloud management, security & networking and anywhere workspace & edge services into a single, unified platform that can be deployed in any IT environment. In addition to established offerings such as VMware Cloud solutions and vRealize for cloud management, VMware released new products, such as Tanzu Application Platform (TAP) and Project Arctic, which are also offered as part of the Cross-Cloud Services product family. More services are expected to be offered under the Cross-Cloud Services umbrella in the future to provide existing customers with more choices and the flexibility to deploy VMware services anywhere.

Like many market players defined as SaaS companies, such as ServiceNow and Salesforce, VMware recently has been emphasizing product bundles. For example, in 2Q21 VMware launched Anywhere Workspace, which brings endpoint management, security and networking capabilities into a single subscription through Workspace One, VMware Carbon Black Cloud and VMware Secure Access Service Edge (SASE), respectively. However, as a company born on premises, VMware is more closely aligned with vendors such as IBM and Microsoft, which are similarly looking to support customers’ hybrid cloud journeys but face pressure to appeal to customers outside their own install bases.

While VMware faces similar challenges, the pervasiveness of VMware — evidenced by roughly 80 million vSphere-based workloads currently in production — arguably puts the company under less pressure to look outside its customer base, at least in the near term, and focus on upselling cloud and application services to its loyal base of traditional virtualization customers. The release of Cross-Cloud Services indicates VMware will take a land-and-expand approach to increase annual contract value (ACV) and become perceived as a SaaS company.  

VMworld 2021: As the coronavirus delta variant continues to take its toll, VMware held its annual event virtually for the second consecutive year. While VMworld 2021 was unique largely because it was the first VMworld in nearly a decade without Pat Gelsinger as CEO, the feel of the event remained the same, offering various breakout sessions and independent talks from customers speaking to each of the five pillars that define VMware’s DT-enabling strategy. VMware also welcomed the CEOs of all major hyperscalers, further highlighting not only its commitment to partners but also to hybrid multicloud as the model that will shape enterprise IT throughout the next 20 years.

Global governments will drive 5G development through stimulus initiatives and preference for domestic suppliers

Government stimulus will advance global 5G development; government support of domestic suppliers will aid smaller vendors

Unprecedented fiscal and monetary stimulus unleashed amid the COVID-19 pandemic will fund, both directly and indirectly, a large portion of the infrastructure cost for economic digitalization. As of August 2021, TBR estimates $3.5 trillion, or around 10% of global fiscal and monetary stimulus announced to date, will funnel into the ICT market over the next five years, a few hundred billion dollars of which is earmarked for 5G-related initiatives. communication service providers (CSPs) and their suppliers will be key beneficiaries of government stimulus, which will help CSPs ease their capex and opex burdens as they migrate to a 5G network architecture and will ensure they have the capital necessary to keep their businesses going and their debt obligations satisfied.

The rise in protectionism and government sponsorship of 5G initiatives, such as open RAN, presents opportunities for smaller RAN vendors to gain share versus incumbent OEMs. A growing number of countries aim to build domestic 5G solutions and ecosystems and are leveraging protectionist government policies and pressure on CSPs to do so, which is leading to a fracturing in the 5G market. These policies are designed to address national security concerns and to drive countries toward technological self-sufficiency and away from dependency on vendors domiciled in other countries. A prime example is the U.S. government’s strong backing of domestic open RAN vendors such as Altiostar, Mavenir and Parallel Wireless. Other countries that are pursuing similar nationalistic strategies include China, the U.K., the European Union, Japan, India, South Korea, Russia, Taiwan and Vietnam.

Coopetition is increasing globally as CSPs collaborate to share 5G network resources 

CSPs are pooling network resources to ensure nationwide 5G coverage despite competitive implications. For instance, Dish Network’s new network agreement formed with AT&T will enable Dish to support its customers while it builds its own 5G network and will provide AT&T with at least $5 billion. However, the deal will likewise limit AT&T’s customer growth from relatively higher-value retail customers if Dish’s wireless business is successful in the long term.

Other global partnerships include China Mobile’s and China Broadcasting Network’s network sharing and construction agreement, South Korean operators partnering to share 5G network infrastructure in rural markets, and Russian operators agreeing to share equal access to 5G spectrum in the country.

Customer incentive to upgrade to 5G is gradually improving though monetization remains limited

Consumer adoption of 5G services is gradually increasing and subscribers are being incentivized by expanding 5G coverage availability, accelerating data speeds, aggressive 5G device promotions, and the introduction of lower-priced 5G handsets.

Monetization remains limited, however, especially in the business-to-business space due in part to the delay of 3GPP’s Release 17, which provides industry standards for key features such as network slicing. 5G is initially being monetized primarily by fixed wireless services and serving as an incentive for customers to migrate to more expensive service plans.

TBR’s 5G Telecom Market Forecast details 5G trends among the most influential market players, including both suppliers and operators. This research includes current-year market sizing and a five-year forecast by multiple 5G market segments and by geographies well as examines growth drivers, top trends and leading market players. TBR’s 5G Telecom Market Landscape includes key findings, market size, customer adoption, operator positioning and strategies, geographic adoption, vendor positioning and strategies, and acquisition and alliance strategies and opportunities.

Hyperscalers begin to shift capex from central cloud build-outs to edge cloud build-outs

Hyperscalers’ focus is on creating value from distributed computing

Hyperscalers are at the cusp of scaling out their edge computing deployments as they focus on creating value from distributed computing, which is a key foundational aspect of their digital ecosystem initiatives. They must pivot from centralized data center build-outs to building out the edge to achieve the latency and quality of service that new network use cases will require.

TBR believes the world’s largest hyperscalers are all likely to extend their cloud footprints closer to endpoints through this decade and expects hyperscaler capex will shift significantly from central cloud to edge cloud over the next five years. The Big Nine hyperscalers will drive significant innovation in the edge space, contributing design references, technology standards, and best practices to facilitate ecosystem development.

Hyperscalers have been experimenting with ways to make it more economically feasible to deploy distributed edge network resources at scale. The commercial model will likely see hyperscalers partner with ecosystem stakeholders, such as tower companies and data center real estate investment trusts, to offset the financial burden of deploying, owning and operating edge compute environments. For example, a hyperscaler could partner with tower companies to site micro data centers at the base of cell sites and plug directly into the access and backhaul network.

Models such as this would help defray the cost and complexity of building and managing many sites. TBR also believes telco sites, such as central offices and aggregation hubs, are logical locations for edge compute resources. These facilities are usually strategically located, are owned and controlled by the operator, have access to power and cooling, have fiber readily available, offer secure access, and are ruggedized to withstand the elements.

Total CSP Edge Compute Spend 2020-2025E

Telcos are divesting their tower assets, which limits their opportunities and market leverage in the edge compute space; supply issues delay rollouts

Telcos relinquishing control over network sites opens door for hyperscalers

Hyperscalers are likely to continue their encroachment of network ownership as they build out their distributed computing platforms. Network access sites, particularly cell sites such as towers, are of unique strategic importance as hyperscalers aim to extend their platforms closer to data origination sources. The ultimate shift toward open virtual RAN and the radio intelligent controller will also spur significant innovation at the access layer of the network, which will prove to be an area of keen interest to hyperscalers that are looking at how to capitalize on new opportunities presented by edge computing, 5G and AI.

TBR believes it is highly likely that hyperscalers will become key customers of shared infrastructure owners, particularly towercos, during this decade as their reach extends beyond their central clouds.

Supply chain constraints will delay peak telecom edge compute spend growth rate to at least 2023

Delays in chipset availability — partly due to the COVID-19 pandemic and partly due to geopolitical factors and technological complexity — will slow the pace at which the vendor ecosystem can meet customer demand for edge compute infrastructure through at least 1H22. Supply chains should be able to meet demand by 2H22, setting the stage for projected 66.7% year-to-year growth in the market in 2023.

Shipping constraints are another headwind to meeting demand. Even if products can be manufactured, there are chronic problems with exporting and importing those products and bringing them to customer sites. This too will push out build timelines.

TBR’s Telecom Edge Compute Market Forecast, which is global in scope, details edge compute spending trends among communication service providers, which include telecom operators, cable operators and hyperscalers. This research includes current-year market sizing and a five-year forecast by multiple edge compute market segments and geographies. TBR’s Telecom Edge Compute Market Landscape, also global in scope, deep dives into the edge compute-related initiatives of stakeholders in the telecom market, including telecom operators, cable operators, hyperscalers and vendors that supply the telecom market.

Junction accelerates Deals’ clients’ time to value and PwC’s shift to platforms

PwC looks at the market and listens to customers to envision what comes next

TBR met with PwC’s Colin McIntyre in May to discuss PwC’s Deals practice, prompted in part by the changing market landscape as pandemic fears and headwinds in the U.S. and Europe appeared to be abating, accelerating interest in merger, acquisition and divestiture activities. McIntyre started the discussion by noting the firm views the emerging post-pandemic market as a key time to accelerate the digital transformation of its Deals practice in concert with changes happening across PwC’s enterprise clients. He noted that new drivers and trends in M&A include the nature of capital, geopolitical and regulatory changes, changing demographics, technology innovations and transformations, and shifting industry opportunities. In this volatile market, PwC sees opportunities to create value around strategic repositioning, performance improvement and asset optimization.

Beyond that fairly straightforward assessment, PwC formed its emerging views around the deals landscape through both in-depth “voice of the customer” research and the firm’s ongoing — and increasing frequency of — Deals engagements. Further, PwC has recognized that clients’ expectations around data sets have shifted from data as an underlying component to wanting insights and data-backed decision making much earlier in the deal’s process. Not data for data’s sake but, in McIntyre’s phrasing, “Take insight and data and be part of the journey … what does that data mean to the client.”

If post-pandemic realities have reordered what is important to customers in looking for acquisitions, PwC’s digitization of its Deals support process is certainly fortuitous. In TBR’s view, PwC’s re-evaluation of the post-pandemic deals market, with an emphasis on data and analysis and a recognition that uncertainty persists, reinforces the firm’s core offerings to help clients stabilize, reposition, acquire and reinvest. Not surprisingly, given the shifts within PwC that TBR has discussed in special reports over the past few years, those core offerings have been bolstered through a digital platform.

Harvesting data for deals, getting to value quickly and delivering differently

PwC describes the relatively new Junction platform as “the digital connectivity point for Deals, providing an enriched, web-based platform for our clients to engage with the team’s insights and analysis. For our people, it creates a digital link between execution and delivery, automating manual processes and streamlining how we ‘report.’” In McIntyre’s more colorful words, Junction is a cloud-based “harvesting machine” for helping clients generate insights and allows PwC to link and talk with clients about their key investment thesis, rather than just keeping the various commercial, compliance and risk pieces in separate silos. The ability to pull together data and insights across an organization’s entire market landscape allows for more collaborative and connected engagements.

As McIntyre explained, “Tax structures, supply chain, risk with controls and all these different pieces of the firm [can be brought] together in a way to work seamlessly. Starts the focus on client’s deal hypothesis, the value drivers, and brings the insights and analysis to support the client’s hypothesis.” He added that Junction allows “clients to comment on the insights and scenario plan and be more collaborative and interactive throughout the deal lifecycle.” In addition, for clients unprepared for a cloud-based and deeply digital experience, PwC tackles change management and training, including “giving the clients the coverage to think differently.” Junction, then, helps PwC focus on value levers and value creation. As McIntyre added, “Value is the currency people understand, as it either goes up or it goes down.”

Webscales are simultaneously moving into multiple trillion-dollar industries, including telecom

Webscales need to enter and disrupt trillion-dollar industries to maintain growth trajectories and sustain stock valuations

Transportation (e.g., connected vehicles), logistics, financial services, healthcare, telecom and other sectors each represent at least a trillion dollars in economic value globally, and webscales are targeting each of these industries for disruption.

Webscales need to rapidly scale their presence in these industries to add billions of dollars in top-line revenue to their respective income statements each year to sustain their stock valuations.

Telecom is a unique market to disrupt because it represents around $2 trillion in current economic value and provides foundational infrastructure to drive disruptive initiatives across other industries. Intelligent connectivity transcends all industries in a digital economy and is the foundational medium for data transmission and the conveyance of cyber-physical exchange that fuels digital transformation. Moves by Microsoft to acquire Affirmed Networks and Metaswitch underscore the strategic imperative for webscales to disrupt the telecom sector.

Webscales will ensure the Fourth Industrial Revolution becomes a reality

The Big Nine webscales are investing over $300 billion annually collectively (R&D and capex), and this amount is growing rapidly, on world-changing endeavors, such as building virtual worlds, truly autonomous vehicles, conversational voice AI, quantum computers, and frictionless, intelligent and ubiquitous connectivity. These initiatives will push the rollout of ICT infrastructure at scale and get governments and businesses aligned to ensure they are digitally transforming.

Webscales are standardizing industrial digitalization to bring enterprises into their ecosystems, and over time the webscales will enhance and broaden the capabilities they offer to enterprises en route to full realization of Industry 4.0.

TBR believes the world’s largest webscales will likely own and control key platforms and ecosystems pertaining to the realization of Industry 4.0 and will garner an outsized portion of the value that is created from the digital economy.

The next major device category is AR/VR

AR/VR represents a relatively new, trillion-dollar market category that could eclipse the market impact smartphones have had on the global economy since the inception of the iPhone in 2007. Microsoft’s up to 10-year, $21.9 billion contract with the U.S. Army for HoloLens-based solutions exemplifies the potential of this market.

All of the Big Nine webscales are investing in AR and VR devices and/or applications as they aim to capitalize on this market.

As with the smartphone era, AR/VR will put enormous requirements on global networks as uptake of new devices occurs. Webscales are learning from prior issues and are actively exploring connectivity options to mitigate the high bandwidth/low latency requirements of AR/VR devices to ensure user experience is acceptable.

TBR has revamped its original Webscale ICT Market Landscape starting with the 1H21 publication. As part of this revamp, the report name has been changed to Webscale Digital Ecosystem Market Landscape. Though this report still covers the end-to-end digital ecosystem endeavors of the major webscales at a holistic level, the content of this report will focus on webscales’ disruption of the telecom industry. The 1H21 publication of the report specifically focuses on webscales’ disruption of the network intelligence-layer technologies domain. TBR’s next edition, expected to publish in January 2022, will focus on the connectivity infrastructure and connectivity business model disruption endeavors of the webscales and what this means for telcos and vendors.

‘Get it right, be convincing and do it fast’: PwC’s Risk Proof upends risk assessments

As the New Equation was announced, PwC’s Cyber, Risk & Regulatory practice was ready

When PwC US Chairman Tim Ryan described trust within the firm’s recently unveiled “The New Equation,” he discussed a variety of business issues, including data, compliance, and environmental commitments, that increasingly challenge PwC’s clients and that “all come back to trust.” The firm, in Ryan’s explanation, can help clients build trust not only within their own organization but also as a client’s core characteristic. Ryan’s description of the importance PwC places on trust, highlighted as part of the firm’s US Analyst Day earlier this month, loudly echoed what TBR heard from the firm’s Financial Crimes team earlier this year during a briefing on the firm’s Risk Proof product offering.

Jeff Lavine, PwC’s Global Financial Crimes leader, told TBR in May that PwC’s Cyber, Risk & Regulatory practice helps clients quantify and measure risk; tell their boards, investors and regulators a convincing and compelling story; and move clients from checking the risk box to administering meaningful control over their enterprise’s risks. That extension of trust — from PwC, fully through the client and into the client’s ecosystem — perfectly syncs with the firm’s New Equation and suggests sustained alignment throughout the various parts of PwC, including the new Trust and Consulting organizations, will be critical to making the New Equation the kind of generational change Ryan anticipates.

Lavine and Vikas Agarwal, PwC’s Risk Products and Financial Crimes Unit leader, detailed for TBR the overall Cyber, Risk & Regulatory practice, including several distinct service lines, from strategy, to data analytics, implementation, and managed services. The Strategy service line takes a compliance and licensing perspective into advising clients on opportunities, particularly around financial technology (fintech). Risk and Controls, staffed by former regulators and experienced risk professionals, provides advice, testing and validation for clients’ risk practices. Operations, the largest of the service lines, provides anti-money-laundering and Know Your Customer (KYC) solutions, primarily based on open-source technology, which, according to PwC, helps the firm more rapidly deliver results. According to Lavine, “We go faster because we’re not a platform.” And Technology and Analytics focuses on implementing risk solutions.

With these well-established service lines providing a foundation, PwC — as part of the firmwide recognition of PwC Products — examined the opportunities for developing a robust, scalable and flexible product to bring the firm’s expertise to a wider market. PwC considered feedback from clients across the full spectrum of the firm’s engagements around risk, examined where white space existed in the current market, and analyzed which current risk trends and needs would continue beyond the next few years, ensuring PwC could build — and properly price — a sustainable and profitable product.

From consulting engagements to subscriptions: A better way to assess risk

Risk Proof, PwC’s platform approach to risk assessment, helps clients perform three basic but essential actions: quantify and measure risk; tell a more robust story to boards, investors, employees and clients; and transition from taking an administrative and reactive risk posture to exercising meaningful risk controls. With features common now in many PwC Products, such as customizable dashboards and interactive reporting, the Risk Proof platform also builds on the firm’s trusted brand around data, financial reporting, compliance and, increasingly, technology.

From a functional perspective, Risk Proof appears to be straightforward; from a strategic perspective, Risk Proof addresses what Agarwal described as critical for enterprises in increasingly interconnected and data-intensive ecosystems, stating that “getting a good risk assessment is foundational to a good financial crimes practice, for example.” While Agarwal may have been reflecting views primarily held by financial institutions required to meet financial crimes regulations, the overall sentiment that good risk assessment is foundational to good business practices stretches across every enterprise and all industry segments. And for companies seeking help around risk, PwC’s Risk Proof solution, in Lavine’s words, allows them to “get it right, be convincing and do it fast.”

Risk Proof also helps PwC. Currently, the firm conducts 15 to 20 risk assessments per year, using a methodology that, while thorough and expansive, requires considerable manual processes and runs up against data and audit trail limitations. In place of these risk assessments, clients can now subscribe to Risk Proof and access all the assessment, reporting and decision-making tools at a fraction of the traditional risk assessment engagement costs. While that opens up a wider market for PwC — those enterprises less likely or unable to pay Big Four rates for risk services — Risk Proof also cannibalizes PwC’s risk revenues.

For Lavine, even with that cannibalization, the firm benefits in the long run in three ways. First, PwC is acting upon itself, rather than being disrupted, which gives the firm some control over the pace and damage of any cannibalization. Second, the Risk Proof dashboard helps PwC better understand its clients, allowing the firm to make better-informed recommendations for other consulting or technology-driven work, ultimately boosting the total relationship value. And, third — rather neatly echoing Ryan’s point about trust and the New Equation — reducing a client’s spend on risk while increasing the client’s capabilities to assess, report and manage risk further enhances the trusted relationship between the client and PwC and between the client and its customers.

Innovation, Amsterdam and an arena: How KPMG teams excel at transformations and technology

After KPMG highlighted the firm’s relationship with Johan Cruijff Arena in Amsterdam at a recent analyst event, TBR requested a follow-up discussion to better understand how the innovation team at the arena had been excelling at many of the key characteristics TBR has identified in consultancies’ and IT services vendors’ innovation and transformation centers around the world. TBR met with Sander van Stiphout, the arena’s innovation lead, and Wilco Leenslag, the KPMG partner leading his firm’s efforts with the arena.

Framed within the context of TBR’s recently published Innovation and Transformation Centers Market Landscape, three key elements of van Stiphout’s work at the arena stood out

Trust is crucial  

First, the arena’s innovation team works with external clients on a subscription basis, a business model rarely deployed by consultancies and IT services vendors. The arena’s clients, which include startups and enterprises testing new technologies and means of enhancing the customer experience, have to fully trust the arena’s innovation team will deliver value for the investment they are paying in subscriptions. TBR believes this business model may be directly related to the unique nature of an arena but could be replicated by a consulting firm or IT services vendor that is willing to bet on collaboration consistently leading to valuable, and deployable, innovation.   

Make your pitch and test your tech  

A second key element that stood out was how the Johan Cruijff Arena serves as a test bed in multiple ways, benefiting the arena’s clients that are startups and the arena itself. Startups not only test their technology solutions in a real-world environment with continuous access to all the variables found in any sporting or entertainment event, but van Stiphout noted that startups also pitch the solutions to internal operational professionals at the arena. For example, the arena’s marketing department must approve a marketing solution prior to testing, enabling startups to pitch and refine solutions with a real-world client before taking it to other clients.

Innovations, particularly from startups, often stall when they meet real-world requirements and clients making investment decisions beyond prototypes. By creating a stage for startups to test run both their product pitch and their product, the Johan Cruijff Arena innovation team helps these companies overcome that innovation roadblock. Additionally, this prototyping method helps to overcome issues associated with the traditional engagement model of working with clients’ innovation departments on pilot projects. Specifically, TBR often hears of emerging technologies becoming “stuck in pilot mode,” a challenge that we feel is directly related to the sheer number of ecosystem participants that are required to scale a solution after proving its value to a client. With the arena-led engagement model, ecosystem entities must first work together ahead of a live trial in the arena, addressing the issue of scaling before testing, not after. 

PwC accelerates SaaS strategy as latest round of solutions aim to solve marketers’ business challenges

In a series of conversations with PwC leaders during the past quarter, TBR learned more about the company’s growing products portfolio, including PwC Customer Link and PwC Media Intelligence, in addition to receiving an update on PwC’s CMO advisory practice. TBR spoke with Brian Morris, Customer Analytics and Marketing lead overseeing PwC Customer Link, and Derek Baker, CMO Advisory lead overseeing PwC Media Intelligence. While each capability serves a specific client need, a common approach and business models suggest PwC is accelerating its portfolio transformation without losing sight of the need to deliver outcomes.

Productizing knowledge while relying on trust expands PwC’s addressable market opportunities with the marketing department and beyond

As PwC continues to evolve its business model, the firm’s push into selling products not only expands PwC’s addressable market opportunities but also elevates its brand, compelling software incumbents to pay closer attention. Both the PwC Customer Link and PwC Media Intelligence solutions are part of the PwC Products catalog and support the firm’s goal of driving SaaS and managed services sales. While both products enable marketing departments’ transformation discussions, each also bolsters PwC’s value proposition with noncore buyers, including chief digital officers and chief data officers, as well as internal audit departments in the case of PwC Media Intelligence.

Relying heavily on its PwC CMO Advisory practice, as well as other areas of the firm, such as its network of Experience Centers, as the medium to introduce these offerings helps PwC drive conversations for cross-selling and upselling services. Solving complex issues around managing customer data is an ever-challenging task for clients. Productizing knowledge through the development of pointed solutions helps PwC address client pain points and close business technology gaps. As PwC continues to build client use cases by selling, deploying and managing these solutions, we expect the firm to continue to approach clients through its fundamental lens: helping marketers solve business challenges.  

Solution overview

PwC Customer Link differentiates on its ability to not only connect offline and online data but also to integrate third-party data and provide analytics around it, as the solution uses various data depositories. Key features include Data Manager that handles first-party and all digital data; Insights Manager that allows PwC to perform better analytics segmentation down to the audience level; and Orchestration Manager that supports buyers’ omnichannel campaigns. Additional features include PwC’s ability to work through a technology-agnostic lens and offer supplemental capabilities with cloud data providers such as Salesforce and Adobe.

Innovation delivered at scale shapes the course of KPMG’s next chapter

Relying on strong governance capabilities to bridge relationships between IT and business will enable KPMG to drive new opportunities in the ESG domain

With KPMG CEO Bill Thomas kicking off the two-day Global Analyst Day it was evident that KPMG’s approach to clients’ changing business models due to COVID-19 has compelled the firm to also transform its own operations to better protect and expand client mindshare. KPMG’s internal transformation began well before COVID-19 when in 2019 the firm announced a $5 billion investment in technology, people and innovation.

Two years and a pandemic later, KPMG is accelerating this transition with the latest examples focused on expanding cloud, environmental and social capabilities, bringing the latter two under one umbrella and committing to zero emissions by 2030. With KPMG working toward establishing a bridge between business and IT stakeholders, the firm also continues to invest in its global team of data and analytics professionals, many of whom focused on translating the business value of IT using low-code and no-code technologies. The strategy — folding analytics within its core offerings — reflects strategies of the Big Four and some of its multinational peers.

But KPMG has an opportunity — and a responsibility — to carve a niche in emerging areas developing frameworks for clients that do not report against financial metrics, particularly within the environmental, social and governance (ESG) domain. With KPMG relying on its robust governance, risk and compliance legacy capabilities, the firm is now focused on the “E” and “S” parts of the three-legged framework, and its clients’ stories provided strong examples of how well the firm handles the change and expectations, from finding the right partners to introducing the most suitable solutions, among others.

Clients are eager to innovate; KPMG knows this and executes against it

With innovation — amplified through KPMG’s global network of Ignition Centers — becoming the connective tissue between the firm’s legacy and new business model, KPMG now has the opportunity to drive change at scale. Peers have often pursued acquisitions that have served as the catalyst of change (think Accenture’s purchase of Fjord and PwC’s buy of BGT that later led to the launch if PwC’s BXT framework). KPMG, however, relies on its organic investments, suggesting the firm is taking a measured but strategic approach, trusting that its own capabilities and culture are strong enough to affect change. A successful execution of this strategy requires broader buy-in across all stakeholders, especially member firm partners who are closer to retirement age and might be more resistant to change.

One group of stakeholders that is open to change is KPMG clients, especially those that are also facing pressure from their end customers that have largely been impacted by the advent of digital. According to TBR’s May 2021 Digital Transformation: Voice of the Customer Research, COVID-19 accelerated demand for services supporting both ongoing and new programs. As cloud continues to be the main technology driving digital transformation investments, buyer-vendor relationships are entering the next phase, where parties must account for new ways of engaging and delivery and opportunities are pivoting from projects to products.

In a use case discussion centered on KPMG’s work at the Johan Cruijff Arena in Amsterdam, TBR heard echoes of similar digital transformation engagements, which encompass innovation, emerging technologies and ecosystem collaboration all within a constrained environment but with implications and lessons for smart city transformations. Arenas can provide a useful test bed for emerging technologies, new business models and digital transformations given the mix of activities that take place inside, the opportunities for customer engagement — from before people arrive through to when they leave — and, of course, the opportunity to gather massive amounts of data.

KPMG’s role, as explained by Sander van Stiphout, head of innovation for the Johan Cruijff Arena, included orchestrating the ecosystem by helping the arena find suitable technology partners; ensuring compliance, particularly around the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR); and providing staff as the arena’s innovation team grew. Most notably for TBR, van Stiphout said KPMG also helped his team create a “new value model,” to include turning the stadium into “a platform for innovation.”

In TBR’s view, shepherding a client’s innovation and digital transformation so successfully that the client becomes an innovation hub for others sets this engagement apart. Van Stiphout added that the arena and KPMG’s partnerships with the city of Amsterdam had been critical to the transformation’s success, and his team and KPMG were now helping Amsterdam officials “get the learnings in place, pave the way for scaling in other cities.” With “lots of demand for an ecosystem approach,” van Stiphout said the arena could now offer consulting to other stadiums on how to run more efficiently, create an environment, and then take transformation to scale.

Turning back to his own staff and echoing a detail provided by Red Hat in TBR’s most recent Innovation and Transformation Centers Market Landscape, van Stiphout noted that his employees now constantly interact with new technologies on a daily basis, which changes their mindset. In TBR’s view, this kind of change, coupled with new and innovative business models, serves KPMG well in describing the impacts the firm can have on clients’ digital transformations.

KPMG 2021 Global Analyst Day: In early June KPMG hosted analysts, clients and executives for two 90-minute virtual sessions during which KPMG demonstrated its evolving value proposition toward becoming a technology-enabled consultancy backed by its ability to trade on trust. KPMG used the time allocated for the presentations wisely and amplified its messaging through four client use cases that not only told the “Why KPMG?” part of the story centered on innovation but also connected to broader societal implications including ever important topics around environmental

EY maintains track record of accurately forecasting and then delivering on the future of blockchain

Paul Brody reiterates past predictions and paints the picture of what he sees on the horizon

It is difficult not to come away from a Paul Brody dissertation on blockchain more excited and optimistic about the transformative power of the technology than when you went in. Compounding the difficulty with taking a contrarian view of Brody’s assertions is the simple fact that he has been right in his predictions from prior years much more often than he has been wrong. The EY partnership seemingly shares this view based on Brody announcing the firm had committed to investing $100 million into his operation to facilitate making his vision a reality.

Highlights from his highly engaging 45-minute opening discussion at EY Global Blockchain Summit 2021:

  • EY made the right bet on public blockchains, which explains why those who embraced private chains earlier on had more highly publicized use cases and why those use cases have seemingly led to the trough of disillusionment.
  • Ecosystem business models are the future. Hub-and-spoke market actions to accelerate adoption do anything but that.
  • Disruption is coming to finance and regulation, and it is coming hard.
  • Programmable money, with Ethereum as the clearing mechanism, will enable the merging of supply chain blockchains with financial transaction chains.
  • Privacy remains a hot-button issue, particularly among the extreme advocates who are not necessarily considering the enterprise requirement for on-chain, permissioned information sharing.
  • Progress will be made; cost optimizing innovations simply cannot be thwarted; they have to be embraced, and blockchain strips cost out of numerous elements of legacy commercial activities across the three pillars of consumers, businesses and governments.

EY’s future-back approach to innovation aligns better to technology adoption than executing against the increasingly anachronistic enterprise-first mentality

“Underneath the business value of blockchain, however, is a rather significant bet to be placed on either deploying public (Ethereum) or private (Hyperledger) blockchains. At the core of this debate rests two issues: the speed of innovation, and the level of security and trust that can be ensured. Innovation, EY argues, happens faster on public networks even if that innovation ameliorates what bad actors inject into the network. In theory at least, even bad actors have a role to play in accelerating innovation by essentially forcing the issues and speeding the time to resolution.” EY blockchain strategy: Betting on public chains with EY advisory for risk mitigation, April 2018

Recent TBR research focusing on blockchain-based supply chain applications indicates blockchain in this context is in the middle of a trough of disillusionment. Brody outlined this idea by way of explaining what EY chose not to do in the past several years. The enterprise-first mentality was a legacy industry success factor when the cost of compute was the limiting factor on digitizing business activity. Continued commoditization and software abstraction increasingly tilts business purchase criteria from infrastructure to productivity gains that software adoption can bring.

Going for large enterprise operating cost improvements led early large-scale initiatives to bet on private chains such as Hyperledger. It followed, in many respects, the Electronic Document Interchange (EDI) playbook of the 1980s and 1990s, called hub-and-spoke, which netted out that the hub could set the standards and the spokes would have no recourse but to follow suit.

EY cited market survey data it believes indicates that private chain had 0.5 participants excluding the founding entity. Additional survey questions stated that 63% of respondents had concern about getting locked into private chains, while 54% believed their existing supplier and service networks were not sufficiently competitive.

Compare and contrast the rollout and now quiet periods for consortiums such as the IBM-Maersk joint venture called TradeLens that took on the monolithic set of interconnected processes that is global trade, and the EY and Microsoft Joint Venture around Royalty Payments that started small, hardened the technology layer, and now provides tangible reference points as they seek to apply this royalty payment shell to multiple use cases. EY states this tracking system for developer royalty payments for games sold through multiple channels has reduced administration costs by 40% and provided a 99% improvement in traceability, from 45 days to less than four minutes, which has enhanced overall community satisfaction.

EY Global Blockchain Summit 2021: TBR has watched the EY Blockchain events blossom in five years from a small coterie of the curious to an army of the passionate. This year’s event had the usual fascinating presentation by EY Blockchain Leader Paul Brody on the current and future state of blockchain’s market maturity that was then reinforced with detailed, technically nuanced breakout sessions that were repurposing of the internal EY Blockchain education modules.