CGI Leverages AI Expertise for GenAI Success

In early March, TBR met with CGI’s Diane Gutiw and Frederic Miskawi, both VPs of Global AI Enablement, for a discussion about CGI’s evolving generative AI (GenAI) capabilities and offerings, as well as the executives’ views of the changing market around digital transformation, IT services and consulting, and AI overall. The following reflects both that discussion and TBR’s ongoing research into CGI and peers across the IT services and broader technology ecosystem.

CGI’s Approach to Generative AI and Innovation

Leveraging AI Expertise for Business Transformation

In describing the current market for IT services and technology-enabled solutions, Gutiw and Miskawi noted that clients emerged from 2023’s GenAI hype cycle feeling overwhelmed by proofs of concept (PoCs). Many emerging technology-centric engagements stalled at the PoC and pilot stages, stymied by challenges around data, change management and uncertain (or slow) ROI.

 

As a result, enterprise IT leadership, already saddled with a vested interest in maintaining relationships with current vendors (think: Amazon Web Services [Nasdaq: AMZN], Microsoft [Nasdaq: MSFT] and others), relies on current vendors and partners for guidance, even in an emerging area like GenAI. This echoes TBR’s findings in our December 2023 AI & GenAI Market Landscape.

 

Gutiw and Miskawi pointed out that in the current market, CGI (NYSE: GIB) can lean on two long-standing strengths: its culture of innovation rooted in governance and methodology, and its expertise and experience with AI, which predates the emergence of GenAI and the subsequent hype cycle. Bringing specificity to assertions about innovation, Gutiw and Miskawi described CGI’s thinking around “digital triplets.”

 

As Gutiw explained, CGI is “taking our digital twins that already exist and extending it by adding the generative AI and explainable AI as the third sibling.” In TBR’s view, this approach to harnessing technology in which clients have already invested — and in which CGI has proven expertise — and multiplying the benefits by leveraging GenAI and explainable AI should be a successful strategy for CGI to expand its footprint at existing clients and solidify its reputation as an innovative leader in the AI market.

 

Reinforcing CGI’s strength around established AI capabilities and scale, Miskawi added that CGI is seeing a multi-model ecosystem where, depending on the nature of the industry that you’re in, the nature of even the group within the enterprise that you’re working with, you have different types of needs, different types of fine-tuning that CGI is doing, mixing specialized AI models, which are more the legacy AI models, with the generative AI models where we’re seeing LLMs [large language models] interacting with the data inside categorization models … that ecosystem is evolving in front of our eyes and accelerating.”

 

Gutiw and Miskawi explained that while CGI’s GenAI practice resides within the company’s Data practice, CGI is undertaking GenAI efforts globally. This is in contrast to the proximity model that differentiates CGI from other IT services vendors. Gutiw said CGI understood that GenAI could not be stuck in one silo or isolated by client and that the technology would bring the most value internally and to clients only through a global approach to accelerating processes and disseminating knowledge around AI.

 

Bolstering this approach, CGI is focused on more than simply GenAI and is innovating on and delivering Frontier AI, according to Gutiw and Miskawi. In TBR’s view, 2023’s relentless hype around GenAI probably makes IT services and technology buyers more likely to look beyond the exciting new trends and instead find credibility in an approach that leverages established AI expertise.
 

TBR principal analysts discuss how the GenAI disruption is similar to prior disruptions, as well as how it is different, and which technology vendors are best positioned to win and why. Watch now by clicking the image below.

CGI’s Strategic AI Investments and Global Success

The CGI GenAI leaders also touched on two aspects of the current IT services and technology ecosystem that TBR believes are critical to vendors’ success: customer zero and technology agnosticism. TBR’s research has shown that the most resonant GenAI use cases start with the vendor testing the solution itself, serving as customer zero for the services or products before bringing them to clients.

 

Gutiw described CGI’s take on this idea, noting that the company innovates, develops and tests GenAI-enabled solutions internally, like other vendors, but ensures clients understand that CGI views this investment as a way to save clients’ money: “We always talk about fail fast. We’re doing that on our dime because we would not fail fast on your dime.” Gutiw described a solution CGI developed for responding to RFPs, called BidGenAI, which pulls from the company’s own database of wins and losses, shortening the time needed to pull together a (hopefully winning) response.

 

While requiring customizations to fit a client’s specific data environment, industry needs and compliance requirements, the BidGenAI tool undoubtedly can be applied across a wide range of enterprises. While not the first or only IT services vendor using the customer-zero approach (think: Accenture [NYSE: ACN] and IBM [NYSE: IBM]), CGI was explicit about the financial benefits clients will realize when CGI foots the innovation — the fail fast — bill.

 

The second aspect, technology agnosticism, has long been a feature of the consulting and IT services market, in which vendors shy away from aligning too closely with any one technology supplier for fear of alienating clients looking for the best-fit solution, not just the tech solution that most benefits the IT services vendor’s or consultancy’s bottom line.

 

Post-pandemic, TBR has seen a pronounced shift among some leading IT services vendors and consultancies toward much closer and more publicly embraced partnerships. Exclusivity remains rare, but something akin to most favored nation status or first among equals has permeated the IT services ecosystem. In this evolving landscape, CGI’s AI leaders described the company’s approach as “technology flexible” and noted strategic partners in the AI space include IBM, Microsoft, Google (Nasdaq: GOOG), SAP (NYSE: SAP), Oracle (NYSE: ORCL) and Amazon Web Services, as well as a slew of smaller technology players.

 

In TBR’s view, CGI’s emphasis on flexibility addresses the need to work with a range of technology partners to meet clients where they are while assuring clients CGI has invested fully in the training and capacity-building necessary for a robust AI practice.

Embracing Transformation While Rooted in Solving Business Problems

Two aspects of CGI’s approach to GenAI struck TBR as significant in understanding the company’s likely path forward and potentially its position within the IT services and GenAI market.

 

First, Miskawi, speaking about GenAI as understood and deployed within CGI itself, said simply, “It is transformative.” One could understand that to be obvious after more than a year of relentless hype. Or one could hear echoes of the famous “Mad Men” line, “It is toasted,” and consider CGI is embracing how much change will be necessitated by adopting GenAI across its own enterprise. Every other IT services vendor could do the same, but it remains to be seen if they can do it with the same welcoming embrace as CGI.

 

Second, TBR noted that during the entire discussion, Gutiw and Miskawi remained focused on business outcomes — for CGI and for its clients — a mindset and approach frequently ascribed to but rarely done. At one point, Gutiw noted that “it’s really understanding how we can use [CGI’s own capabilities and partner technologies] safely and how we can help solve business problems leveraging the technology.”

 

CGI’s challenge, of course, is ensuring that leaders across the company understand how to stay focused on clients’ business problems and how to recognize when a business challenge could be addressed through a GenAI-enabled solution.

CGI and GenAI: Investments, Approaches and Designs

In addition to the wide-ranging discussion, CGI’s GenAI leaders shared specifics about the company’s GenAI practice, including:

 

  • Over 10,000 professionals globally engaged on Data Analytics and Data Engineering projects with clients
  • CGI’s AI Advisory Services include AI Enterprise Governance OCM, Data and AI journey design and implementation, AI Business Consulting services with AI strategy road maps, and Responsible Use of AI frameworks.
  • CGI’s enterprise AI investments have focused on operational excellence; training and teaming; foundational capabilities around data, platforms and processes; and solution/use-case development.
  • CGI has invested in a Responsible AI Framework and an AI Strategy Framework to guide itself and its clients through the complexities of AI governance and risk.

 

In TBR’s 1H24 CGI Federal Vendor Profile, we noted that “CGI Federal’s parent company announced in July 2023 it would invest $1 billion over the next three years to fuel AI-based growth. CGI’s forthcoming outlays will fund the expansion of its AI-based advisory capabilities — particularly around the company’s Responsible Use of AI framework, which would resonate well with federal agencies. CGI Federal is facing a shifting competitive landscape in federal digital consulting, as General Dynamics Information Technology (GDIT) (NYSE: GD) is standing up a new advisory practice that will push adoption of its AI-related digital accelerators and ManTech is leveraging its 3Q23 acquisition of Definitive Logic Corp. to launch an AI-focused Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence Solutions Practice.”

 

In addition, TBR notes that CGI Federal won a deal with the U.S. Department of State in October 2023 to provide on-site processing functions for consular services in Australia, Fiji, Japan, New Zealand and South Korea, leveraging the CGI Atlas360 solution’s AI capabilities to help enhance the visa application process.

 

The Telecom Industry Faces a Reckoning

Overarching Takeaways from Mobile World Congress 2024

Mobile World Congress 2024 (MWC24) brought together more than 2,700 exhibitors and 101,000 attendees from across the global ICT sector, including representatives from many other industries that are pursuing digital transformation. TBR notes that MWC Barcelona is closing in on the pre-pandemic high-water mark for attendance and exhibitors set in 2019.

 

The MWC ecosystem has proved resilient, confirming MWC Barcelona’s role as the most important, must-attend event in the world for all things related to mobile technology. The most popular topics discussed at MWC24 included generative AI (GenAI), traditional AI, network APIs, private networks, satellite connectivity, sustainability and cloud transformation.

 

TBR notes that hyperscalers (particularly Amazon Web Services [AWS] [Nasdaq: AMZN], Microsoft [Nasdaq: MSFT] and Google [Nasdaq: GOOGL]) kept a lower profile at MWC this year, a marked change from the loud and flashy presence they had at MWC23. Hyperscalers also continued to double down on positioning themselves as partners with communication service providers (CSPs).

 

Additionally, TBR notes that the AI/GenAI hype feels tangible and is unlikely to fall by the wayside like the metaverse, crypto, blockchain, and other hyped-up concepts and technologies that have come and gone in years past. Many use cases and business cases for AI and GenAI in the telecom industry make logical sense and have the potential to produce profoundly significant business outcomes, especially related to cost efficiency. Technological readiness for and commercialization of AI and GenAI are in process, and much more innovation is in store.

 

One of the most interesting takeaways TBR analysts observed from MWC24 was how little 5G, 5G-Advanced and 6G were discussed. While AI/GenAI, network APIs and private networks dominated mindshare at the event, as was widely expected, the lack of content about cellular technology market development was striking and underscores the challenges the telecom industry continues to face with revenue growth and ROI. This lack of discussion also underscores how CSPs are loathe to make further investments in 5G, especially 5G-Advanced, pending measurable ROI, and that vendors see this and are concerned 5G-Advanced will not generate significant revenue.

 

Though CSPs continue to talk a big game about B2B use cases, network slicing, private networks, cloud-native transformation, AI/GenAI and network APIs as key enablers of the digital economy and new revenue for themselves, their loud, echoing chorus rings hollow and is losing credibility as they do not have anything of significant, sustainable value to show for their efforts in these areas. This is forcing the vendor community, hyperscalers and some enterprises to hedge their bets and seek alternative routes to meet their business objectives.

 

TBR notes that the situation CSPs find themselves in is becoming increasingly dire, and as an industry CSPs are reaching a point where they will have to reckon with two decades of underachieving on transformation initiatives and weakening business metrics. Additionally, with the cost of capital now at levels last reached nearly 20 years ago in most major markets, CSPs’ financial pictures are worsening, and this will likely prompt a new wave of M&A as well as bankruptcies and structural reorganizations. CSPs also have a people problem, which is arguably the primary reason CSPs have been unable to realize their objectives of shifting from telcos to techcos.

 

TBR’s research indicates that the telecom industry has entered a period of rationalization and that the operator and vendor landscape, as well as the telecom business model, will fundamentally change over the next decade. The anti-pragmatic, restrictive and often hostile regulatory environment, coupled with macroeconomic headwinds (especially the relatively high cost of capital), and the inability for CSPs to truly transform into cloud-native digital service providers have brought the industry to this precipice.

 

By the end of this decade, TBR expects the telecom industry to look much different than it looks now, with fewer, but larger and stronger, CSPs and vendors remaining and new business models for network connectivity and related technology enablers disrupting the status quo enjoyed by the industry for decades.
 

Click the image below to join TBR live for an in-depth recap of Mobile World Congress 2024
TBR Insights Live - MWC Debrief: AI, Private Networks, Cloud, Network APIs and More

Impact and Opportunities

AI Will Help CSPs Significantly Reduce Costs

Myriad use cases for AI and GenAI were discussed at MWC, spanning all aspects of a CSP. Use cases related to call centers and customer lifecycle management present the biggest opportunity to move the cost savings needle. OSS and BSS, which underpin customer lifecycle management, will be key domains through which AI/GenAI evangelization will take place within CSPs. Network-oriented use cases for AI/GenAI are also numerous but will take a bit longer to materialize compared to call center and customer lifecycle management use cases. The bigger issues surrounding AI/GenAI pertain to governance, privacy and societal considerations, any of which could stifle market development.

 

Labor will ultimately be significantly impacted by AI/GenAI, but TBR expects gradual attrition, with vacated positions not being filled, rather than abrupt, large-scale layoffs at CSPs. Importantly, the AI and GenAI outputs shown in use cases demonstrated at MWC24 essentially all required vetting by human resources, at least at this stage of market development.

CSPs Have a People Problem

Shifting from a telco to a techco requires cultural, talent and mindset changes at CSPs. For example, to become a techco, CSPs would need to think and behave like a techco and have a workforce that understands techco concepts such as CI/CD (continuous integration, continuous delivery) pipelines, agile workflow methodology, cloud, APIs, software engineering, computer programming languages like Python, as well as containers and microservices.

 

Change management initiatives, including at the senior management level, are likely to become more prevalent as leading CSPs attempt to cross this chasm, and management consultancies are poised to play a key role in facilitating this change. Though the presence of unions among some CSPs could stifle this shift, CSPs have had more than a decade to make progress toward this human resource transition.

 

Upskilling and reskilling are viable, partial solutions to address these issues, but these types of initiatives need more formalized structure, investment, and executive sponsorship and oversight to deliver relevant and meaningful results. TBR also expects more CSPs to adopt “cap and fizzle” or “captive” strategies to make this shift from telco to techco, whereby the legacy is wound down and separate entities are stood up in a more techco-oriented structure.

Still No “New Deal” or “Digital Single Market” for Europe’s Telecom Industry

Europe-based operators continued to use MWC as a mouthpiece to plead with governments and related institutions on the continent for regulatory reform (especially regarding consolidation, spectrum policy and evolving outdated regulations, some of which date back many decades). However, while some additional M&A is likely to be approved that may not have been allowed pre-pandemic (such as the Vodafone-3 U.K. and MasMovil-Orange Spain deals), no significant changes are visible on the horizon.

 

Using history as a guide, structural changes at the level hoped for by the telecom industry will likely only occur when macroeconomic deterioration forces governments into action and drives broader restructuring and change management at organizations. Said differently, the only way Europe’s telecom industry (and quite frankly, the global telecom industry) will see broad regulatory and structural changes is amid a catalyst moment, which tends to occur during periods of unprecedented economic stress.

 

For example, the last significant, large-magnitude industrial changes across major societies occurred during the Great Depression of the 1930s, which reshaped labor and industrial dynamics, and the Great Recession of 2007-2009, which reshaped the financial services industry. Telecom will, unfortunately, need a similar economically driven crisis to bring about the structural changes that the industry seeks.

Telco-led Initiatives Are Unlikely to Have Staying Power

CSPs continue to attempt to band together in key areas, such as network APIs via CAMARA and the Open Gateway API program, and on telco-specific large language models (LLMs) via the Telco AI Alliance, a recently created consortium spearheaded by SK Telecom and joined by several other major CSPs.

 

Using history again as a guide, initiatives such as these are unlikely to gain critical mass due to competitive, cultural and resourcing reasons, both between CSPs and within CSPs. For example, the recent past has seen AT&T’s (NYSE: T) Enhanced Control, Orchestration, Management & Policy (ECOMP)/ONAP (Open Network Automation Platform) and Deutsche Telekom’s (DT) MobiledgeX initiatives falter, with both being taken over by hyperscalers (Microsoft took over ONAP via its strategic arrangement with AT&T, and Google acquired MobiledgeX). The last major telco-led initiative to gain broad, global traction and yield significant benefits across the industry was the SMS initiative over 20 years ago.

 

TBR continues to believe that the best-suited players to make network APIs and LLMs relevant and outcome producing at scale are the hyperscalers, with CSPs likely to partner with hyperscalers for their boundarized portion of the overall market opportunity. Most CSPs are likely to remain technology consumers instead of technology producers, keeping them confined to connectivity providers and dependent on the vendor community and other players like hyperscalers for innovation.

CSPs Continue to Put the Cart Before the Horse with Enterprise Use Cases and Lack Focus on More Promising Consumer Opportunities, such as FWA

Most CSPs still have not deployed 5G standalone (SA) at scale, and those that have are not running truly cloud-native, microservices-based 5G cores. New enabling technologies, such as network slicing, are dependent on the adoption of cloud-native 5G core in a 5G SA architecture. This means that most CSPs globally are still not prepared to deliver on the promises of 5G for enterprise or to capitalize on the technology’s benefits.

 

CSPs can and should focus more on consumers, where fixed wireless access (FWA) is a proven, ROI-positive and scalable use case that is broadly relevant in most countries worldwide. CSPs’ current 5G non-SA networks and noncloud-native 5G SA networks are capable of supporting 5G FWA at scale, and this use case should be garnering more investment to drive more immediate revenue growth.

FWA Remains the Largest Revenue-generating Use Case for 5G and has Room to Scale

Though CSP deployment of 5G FWA is growing, most CSPs continue to underestimate the potential of the technology, likely because FWA ties up a lot of spectrum resources for relatively low average revenue per user (ARPU). TBR continues to believe that FWA represents one of the biggest opportunities for mobile network operators to monetize their 5G investments and drive scalable revenue growth.

 

Technological innovations currently available (e.g., multiband carrier aggregation, beamforming, extended range millimeter wave) and coming in the not-too-distant future (e.g., New Radio Unlicensed [NR-U], integrated access backhaul, silicon advancements) are likely to bring dramatic improvements in network performance, energy efficiency, and the usability of spectrum to support services such as FWA at large scale.

 

TBR maintains that 5G FWA should be thought of as wireless fiber and that the notion of having to deploy fiber to every business and residential premise globally is not only economically unfeasible but also unrealistic from a pure time-to-market standpoint to meet digital equity initiatives. 5G FWA can address these challenges and is a far more realistic and economically feasible technology to help the world bridge the digital divide, bring more competition in the global broadband market and support new use cases.

Finance Industry Indirectly Drives Investment in Private Cellular Networks

TBR analysts learned at MWC24 that the financial services industry is indirectly driving investment in private cellular networks. For example, the ability to track and obtain information from disparately located assets using IoT connectivity, such as heavy machinery and automobiles, is enabling businesses such as agriculture companies, fleet operators, mining companies, logistics companies and auto manufacturers to become eligible for various financial products, such as asset insurance and extended warranties, as well as lower premiums on existing insurance policies. Situations such as these are incentivizing the aforementioned types of businesses to invest in their own private cellular networks or pull CSPs into hybrid network situations.

Conclusion

The telecom industry is entering a new, more precarious phase of uncertainty. What CSPs and their vendors should be doing, they have been unable to do (or are moving far too slow), and what they should not be doing, they continue to cling to and do. If structural changes do not occur in the telecom industry in the next couple of years, the probability grows that other players (e.g., hyperscalers, software-centric vendors) will increasingly circumvent CSPs to pursue their own digital transformation-related interests.

 

The only players TBR has seen that have the financial and talent wherewithal, ability and credibility to deliver digital transformation and technological innovation at scale in the industrial internet era are hyperscalers and is likely to remain exclusively hyperscalers.

KPMG Leaders Talk 2024 Priorities and Plans to Scale Execution

Ready, Steady, Scale

As part of the Big Four, KPMG has brand permission and a breadth of services relevant to nearly every role in any enterprise. TBR believes KPMG will accelerate the scale and completeness of its offerings in the coming year, building on a solid foundation and furthering the gaps between KPMG and other consulting-led, technology-enabled professional services providers.

 

KPMG’s four-part framework — Connected, Powered, Trusted and Elevated — resonates with clients and technology partners, provides KPMG’s professionals with clear insight into the firm’s strengths and strategy, and underpins a transformation already well underway. The coming year will challenge KPMG’s leaders to execute on the promise of that transformation during the next wave of macroeconomic pressures, talent management battles and technology revolutions.

 

KPMG’s leaders described their priorities as transforming the firm’s go-to-market approach, unlocking the power of the firm’s people, reimagining ways of working, and innovating capabilities and service enhancements. Success against these priorities, in TBR’s view, will come as KPMG shifts from building a foundation to scaling alongside the growing needs of its clients.

Welcome (or Welcome Back) to Lakehouse

Breaking from the traditional form for analyst events — presentations followed by special sessions and one-on-one meetings — KPMG divided the attending analysts into three groups, rotating each group through Ignition, KPMG’s immersive innovation lab experience; presentations and demos in an Innovation Showcase; and a tour of Lakehouse. A few highlights:

 

  • In addition to walking the analysts through the typical 10-minute start of an Ignition session, recreating what KPMG’s clients experience, the firm gave the stage to a client, who shared their experiences working with KPMG. The consulting and technology solutions provided by KPMG served as useful context for the breadth of KPMG’s capabilities and the importance of using an innovation center. Most notably, the client described how their own brand depended on being a trusted partner in the communities they served and how their relationship with KPMG reinforced that trust across the full spectrum of the consultancy, the client and the client’s clients. TBR came away with a better appreciation for KPMG’s ability to extend trust and partner across its offerings and engagements.
  • KPMG’s technology presentations included a wide range of solutions leveraging an array of emerging technologies such as quantum and generative AI (GenAI). Taking more than the allotted hour with TBR, the KPMG team walked through a surprising number of offerings, repeatedly coming back to two critical points: These are currently active solutions, deployed with clients and moving toward scale (i.e., not ideas undergoing testing or in beta), and KPMG boasts a breadth of technology capabilities that TBR realized was far greater than our expectations prior to the event.
  • KPMG has continued to apply lessons around training and talent management to maximize the firm’s culture effects delivered by Lakehouse. As shared by KPMG’s leaders, small changes since Lakehouse opened have kept the employee experience fresh and the overall satisfaction with attending training or other kinds of sessions at Lakehouse exceptionally high. For example, KPMG learned that two and a half days of in-person sessions reduced the stress of being away from clients or engagements for a full week. By layering Monday to Wednesday and Wednesday to Friday training schedules, KPMG can bring more employees through Lakehouse without inducing training burnout or challenging employees to balance client demands with professional development time. In an informal discussion, an event guest (neither an analyst nor a KPMG employee) commented to TBR that she was amazed to see a facility that was designed for and dedicated to training.

 

KPMG’s decision to ease into an analyst event with small groups wandering around Lakehouse played to the firm’s strengths as approachable and multifaceted, with each of the three sessions quietly reinforcing the firm’s commitments to maintaining trust with clients, advancing technology-enabled solutions to business problems, and supporting the firm’s own people through professional development and firm culture.

 

While the firm is already leveraging the facility globally, one challenge for KPMG next year and beyond will be replicating Lakehouse globally. During a coffee chat shortly after the analyst event in Orlando, TBR and a senior KPMG consulting partner discussed how, whether and when the firm could open similar best-in-class training facilities in key geographies, such as Europe, the Middle East and Asia Pacific.

 

While Lakehouse requires a significant investment from KPMG’s legally separate member firms, TBR — and KPMG leaders who discussed the possibilities — has already seen Lakehouse expand from a training-only facility to a showcase for clients, reinforcing KPMG’s culture and the firm’s place in the professional services market.

Stick to the Mission and Tackle the Biggest Problems

Across the full day of presentations, KPMG repeatedly came back to highlighting its efforts to bring together the entire firm to deliver value to clients through a four-part framework: Connected, Powered, Trusted and Elevate. That value, according to KPMG’s leadership, began with trusted relationships with its clients, built when clients developed their business strategies and turned to KPMG for advice and validation.

 

Notably, according to KPMG’s leadership, pure technology companies often lack the strategy consulting permission (or people) as an enterprise begins a transformation, even if implementing new or modernizing existing technology will play a leading role. And when the technology is delivering business results, KPMG has the trusted advisor role and the skills to refresh an enterprise’s strategy.

 

Bringing this high-level view — which is not that different from what the other Big Four firms offer — to a more concrete understanding of KPMG’s value to its clients, TBR repeatedly heard two phrases during the Lakehouse event: “Let’s go after the core of the biggest problems you have” and “Stick to our mission.”

 

The first phrase demonstrates a willingness to take risks and tackle hard issues, not simply assist with marginal, if necessary, changes. In contrast, many of KPMG’s IT services competitors that are equally willing to help clients move from technology transformation pilots to enterprise-scale deployments still prioritize transactional engagements with a reduced risk mindset. (Note: TBR believes GenAI will strip 15% of the cost from current large-scale managed services contracts, a potentially existential threat to a few global systems integrators [SIs].)

 

The second phrase signals to TBR that KPMG’s leadership fully embraces the firm’s role within the larger services and technology ecosystem, to include where and when the firm needs to partner with technology vendors and even larger SIs. In a market flush with technology hype — GenAI today, metaverse in 2021, blockchain in 2019 — KPMG has resisted the temptation to chase technology discussions with technologists for technology’s sake and instead has focused on business decision makers looking for advice, a strategy and an execution plan. Stick to the mission. Go after the biggest problems.

Who Has the Money and Time to Build Their Own Bridge?

In a wide-ranging presentation and discussion around data, KPMG leaders acknowledged that every professional services firm emphasizes rigorous, standardized and methodical analysis of its clients’ data (when they can get it and its useful; see TBR’s Voice of the Customer research for how often that is the case).

 

To separate itself, KPMG leaders said the firm leans into experience, applicable industry knowledge, a dedication to methodology, and extracting value from existing assets. In TBR’s view, this last point illustrates a critical shift in enterprise buyers’ priorities that KPMG has picked up on and has begun to leverage.

 

In TBR’s view — and apparently KPMG’s as well — consulting and digital transformation clients want to move beyond the endless rounds of buying new technology solutions and reorient to extracting value from existing assets. To span that gap from existing data to modernized technology and transformed business, enterprises still need a bridge. KPMG has the blueprints and the experience in building those bridges, helping clients elevate and transform.

Solidifying Alliances Through Trust, Culture and Shared Values

Pivoting to alliances with technology partners, KPMG’s leaders spent a significant portion of the analyst event describing how the firm works with Google Cloud (Nasdaq: GOOG), IBM (NYSE: IBM), Oracle (NYSE: ORCL), Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT), ServiceNow (NYSE: NOW), Salesforce (NYSE: CRM), SAP (NYSE: SAP), Workday (Nasdaq: WDAY), and Verizon (NYSE: VZ). We cover SAP and Verizon in detail below, but a few elements came across as essential to how KPMG sees its role in the larger technology ecosystem:

 

  • Technology partners look to KPMG for industry experience and access to buying personas at clients that technology partners simply do not have (think: CFO).
  • Technology partners expect KPMG to share values, align culturally and invest in sustained relationships at multiple levels within each partner.

 

The first set of expectations technology partners have for KPMG do not significantly differ, if at all, from similar expectations of the other Big Four firms. The second set, in TBR’s view, demonstrates KPMG’s more focused and selective approach to alliances. Technology partners only expect cultural alignment and shared values if both parties make that a core element of the alliance.

 

Given the nature of other technology-plus-consultancy alliances TBR has analyzed in detail, KPMG is likely driving the emphasis around cultural fit and shared values, an effort that cannot be replicated across tens or even hundreds of alliance relationships. As will be reinforced by the following sections on SAP and Verizon, TBR sees KPMG’s alliance strategy as well suited to how the firm has built its brand around trust. As the firm continues to scale to meet clients’ needs, maintaining that emphasis on trust, culture and shared values will challenge KPMG and require careful management across the global member firms.

 

One final comment: One of the leaders from one of KPMG’s technology partners began their discussion by stating, “The candor and brutal honesty that they brought to the assessment reinforced KPMG’s reputation.” It is hard to imagine an endorsement more rooted in trust and shared values.

KPMG and SAP: Growing Exceptionally Fast, with Plenty of White Space Ahead

For more than a decade, KPMG’s audit relationship with SAP precluded the firm from going to market jointly with SAP and constricted KPMG’s potential relationship with the ERP giant. Unrestrained now, KPMG has the opportunity to step smartly into a competitive field currently overcrowded with services vendors looking to ride the wave of enterprises migrating to SAP S/4HANA. Separating KPMG from this pack, which includes its Big Four peers and global SI (GSI) giants like Accenture (NYSE: ACN) and Capgemini, requires executing on three key elements, in TBR’s view.

 

First, KPMG needs to ensure SAP’s leadership, sales teams and especially SAP S/4HANA subject matter experts understand the scale and capabilities KPMG already has and where the firm is investing — in SAP — in the near term. Convincing SAP that KPMG will bring value beyond just another consultancy or SI to SAP’s clients will help KPMG expand its small SAP footprint within existing clients.

 

Second, KPMG will need to continue investing in its SAP practice to ensure credible scale in a crowded marketplace in the long term. KPMG is not starting from zero, and with success in the SAP marketplace requiring integrated cloud, security and business capabilities, KPMG will have to ensure continued tight collaboration among all of these adjacent areas and the 5,000 SAP consultants it already has on its books.

 

Finally, with industry and domain expertise critical to successful SAP-led business transformation KPMG’s Powered Enterprise approach will be key to customer success. Aligning functional and domain expertise across SAP’s Business Technology Platform (BTP) with industry understanding will be critical to driving client value in areas like environmental, social and governance (ESG) and AI. Clients are increasingly seeking outcomes through technology investment, and the KPMG Powered approach aligns the KPMG Target Operating Model, Powered Technology and Powered Industry excellence as well as its suite of deployable assets to drive outcomes with business value.

KPMG and Verizon: Vendor Agnostic No More

If SAP is KPMG’s up-and-coming alliance, what KPMG has developed with Verizon truly distinguishes the firm from the rest of the market. In essence, KPMG and the networking giant evolved their relationship from a history of transformational engagements into what KPMG leaders describe as a collaborative “360-degree relationship” based on a foundation of trust. KPMG brings deep business intelligence and systems integration capabilities, combined with strong industry experience, going to market with Verizon and their disruptive 5G/Mobile Edge Computing technology. In addition, KPMG continues to deliver transformative work, often leveraging other key alliance partners such as ServiceNow.

 

Focusing initial joint go-to-market efforts around opportunities in healthcare, KPMG and Verizon have staked out complementary offerings and responsibilities. For example, as KPMG highlighted during the event, the firm “brings advanced data science and analytics capabilities through KPMG Lighthouse,” while Verizon provides “advanced multi-access edge computing and API management capabilities.” KPMG also emphasized that, specific to healthcare, the firm has launched an Innovation Lab supported by Verizon’s “private 5G infrastructure as backbone.”

 

Describing the array of KPMG and Verizon services, KPMG leaders noted the many offerings, such as Cloud Engineering, Platform Design & Engineering and Digital Twin, Device Simulation & Certification, that KPMG and Verizon will deliver through a joint approach, combining KPMG and Verizon professionals. In TBR’s view, this alliance stands apart from other consultancy technology alliances because of the innovation, development, go-to-market and commercialization commitments.

 

This is not a vendor-agnostic approach. This is picking a 5G, networking and edge provider and going all-in. Based on the presentations onstage and sidebar discussions, this all-in commitment goes both ways, with Verizon clearly seeing the value of partnering as closely as possible with KPMG.

Bringing the Right People Together and Always Making a Difference

During the afternoon sessions, TBR heard multiple client use cases, each one reinforcing KPMG’s core messages around trust, transformation, innovation and value. Three moments stood out as exemplifying precisely what makes KPMG the market-leading firm it is today:

 

  • During a discussion on cybersecurity, KPMG’s leaders noted that the firm brings security experts, industry subject matter experts and even tax professionals to Ignition Center engagements, stressing that this approach — which includes the whole KPMG team — serves multiple purposes. First, the client can appreciate the full range of KPMG’s capabilities and offerings. Second, this approach allows the client (in this case, the chief information security officer [CISO]) to see the business from others’ perspectives. Third, KPMG creates a collective, trusted, collaborative environment, focused on both innovation and core business problems.
  • In a presentation by KPMG, one of its clients and one of its technology partners (Oracle), the client said one key criterion in selecting KPMG was the firm’s credibility in always being able to deliver the right people at the right time who understand the right technology. Trusted relationships depend on dependability and consistent delivery. This client case proved KPMG’s commitment and reinforced that KPMG has been building needed scale.
  • Lastly, dinner at Lakehouse included a panel discussion featuring LPGA’s Commissioner Mollie Marcoux Samaan, and the assistant U.S. team captain, golf pro Angela Stanford, both arriving directly from the 2023 Solheim Cup in Spain, where the U.S. had its best ever score on European soil. According to the LPGA guests, KPMG provided analytics-enabled insights and on-site support to help the U.S. team pick the right pairings over the course of the tournament, bringing data and additional rigor to intensely personal and often challenging decisions. As a use case, few of KPMG’s enterprise clients will need the firm’s help pairing golfers to win a tournament, but every client will likely lean on KPMG for assistance with data-driven decisions.

 

At the start of 2024, KPMG has positioned itself well to sustain its core values, bring transformation to clients and continue to scale. Now comes the execution of that strategy.

 

Note: KPMG also shared specific details about its alliances with ServiceNow, Salesforce, Workday, Microsoft and Oracle. These details will be included in TBR’s ongoing coverage of KPMG and in upcoming ecosystem reports.

 

SoftwareOne Aims for More Comprehensive SAP S/4HANA Transformation Role With Novis Euforia Acquisition

On Jan. 3, 2024, SoftwareOne announced its acquisition of Novis Euforia, a Spain-based SAP and cloud services boutique. This special report reflects TBR’s discussion with Pierre-Francis Grillet, SoftwareOne’s global lead for SAP Services, immediately following the announcement, as well as TBR’s ongoing analysis of SoftwareOne and the SAP landscape.

With New Talent and IP, SoftwareOne Extends Into SAP S/4HANA

According to Grillet, SoftwareOne intends to improve its position in the overall SAP ecosystem by moving beyond helping clients with cloud migrations into a more comprehensive SAP S/4HANA transformation role. To meet that aspiration, SoftwareOne’s acquisition of the Spain-based SAP boutique Novis Euforia adds experience and competencies around technically driven SAP S/4HANA migrations and positions SoftwareOne to better address growing client demand for modernization with minimal disruption and transformation through the journey to SAP S/4HANA.

 

While only a 35-person company, Novis Euforia marks about an 8% increase in SoftwareOne’s SAP practice, which Grillet said would be further bolstered by 15 senior functional data architects who are focused on finance and supply chain as well as ongoing growth in traditional SAP technical areas. Grillet believes the Novis Euforia acquisition and the new hires will significantly improve SoftwareOne’s SAP revenues, adding to his assessment that SAP has high growth potential for SoftwareOne.
 

Upcoming TBR Insights Live: Join TBR’s Cloud team for a deep dive into how vendors will capitalize on new GenAI-led opportunities to combat the general slowing of cloud market opportunity growth in 2024!


 

Pragmatic Alternative to Complexity

Expanding on clients’ current concerns around SAP, Grillet noted that larger-scale competitors, such as the global systems integrators (GSIs), have increasingly embraced clean core as a means to rein in the rampant customizations often blamed for slowing migration to SAP S/4HANA and limiting innovation on SAP.

 

In SoftwareOne’s experience, according to Grillet, customizations fall into three categories: unused and therefore nonconsequential; used but no significant remediation required; and used with more complex remediation required. Notably, Grillet added, “a good part of remediations can be automated, further reducing the impact of customizations on the conversion to SAP S/4HANA effort.” A GSI’s greenfield engagement can be relatively expensive, in Grillet’s view, in contrast to SoftwareOne’s focus on preparation prior to a pragmatic and manageable approach to SAP modernization.

 

Further, Grillet said SoftwareOne has positioned itself well for negotiating a client’s best deal with SAP, given SoftwareOne’s vast experience around licensing and usage. Massive-scale enterprises undoubtedly need GSIs’ capabilities in complex SAP transformations, but many large and most small and midsize enterprises, in SoftwareOne’s view, can be better served through an incremental approach to transformation, framed by a deeper appreciation for customizations’ true hurdles.
 
Grillet also noted that, “Data, in particular, is relevant in the context of the Novis acquisition, as SNP automates the data transformation and conversion from ECC (ERP Central Component) to SAP S/4HANA, enabling, for example, company code and chart of account rationalization when moving to SAP S/4HANA.”

Gorging on a Massive Pie

The services opportunity around SAP S/4HANA transformations is immeasurable as credible estimates vary widely and, to some degree, do not matter. Services vendors with the available talent and credibility will not lack customers seeking help, especially as SAP’s self-imposed 2027 ECC deadline relentlessly approaches.

 

SoftwareOne’s latest acquisition helps the company address a larger range of client challenges and expands its footprint in Spain, with expectations of extending into Latin America and South America. While SoftwareOne’s SAP practice, at 500-plus SAP-trained professionals, lacks the scale of the largest GSIs, the vast majority of clients are not dismissing potential services providers because of scale — if you have the talent available now, you are hired. (OK, it is not that dramatic of a seller’s market now, but it will be before the end of 2027.)
 
Grillet also noted to TBR that one of the company’s “biggest assets is the fact that most of [SoftwareOne’s] professionals are dual-certified and also hold certifications for the three main hyperscalers: Microsoft, AWS and Google. They have a deep understanding not only of the SAP systems but also the platform they run on.”

 

In TBR’s view, SoftwareOne has consistently played to its own strengths, such as a deep inside view of midsize and large enterprise IT environments, to include spending and actual software usage. This recent acquisition continues that strategy, comes amid a slow-growing rush to add talent around SAP S/4HANA, and should allow SoftwareOne to extend its client base for SAP services over the next few years.

 

With six successful acquisitions in recent years, SoftwareOne has proven to be adept at integrating capabilities and leveraging IP. This seventh will continue SoftwareOne’s good fortune and make the vendor a must-watch competitor in the SAP space. Success will also depend on SoftwareOne’s ability to use the 15 senior functional data architects it is gaining as a bridge between existing cloud migration capabilities and SAP S/4HANA business transition opportunities, thus helping the company elevate the brand’s permission around SAP, a necessary step to avoid getting stuck in the increasingly commoditized migration services space.
 
Grillet summed up SoftwareOne’s position by noting that, “The ability to bridge between cloud migration to SAP S/4HANA conversion will depend on more than just these 15 new resources. It will be achieved through the extension of the services portfolio and its [the portfolio’s] underlying tools and IP — including adoption and embedding of the SNP tooling — successfully engaging in the early advisory and preparation engagements, and building an ecosystem of culturally aligned, functionally oriented partners in the various markets where SoftwareOne delivers its SAP services.”

HPE Doubles Down on Edge-to-cloud Vision with Acquisition of Juniper Networks

On Jan. 9, 2024, HPE and Juniper announced they had entered a definitive agreement through which HPE intends to acquire Juniper Networks for approximately $14 billion in cash. The planned acquisition is expected to close in late 2024 or early 2025 should the agreement receive regulatory and Juniper shareholder approval. By acquiring Juniper, HPE’s networking capabilities, especially around AI-enabled networking, will be immediately bolstered. Naturally, the acquisition would also support HPE’s edge-to-cloud vision. Additionally, TBR predicts Juniper’s SaaS assets will be integrated into HPE’s GreenLake platform, which would strengthen GreenLake’s value proposition and expand the audience of enterprise customers.  

Acquiring Juniper Networks Will Bolster HPE’s Edge-to-cloud Networking Capabilities

Demand for networking solutions that securely connect, protect and analyze companies’ data will continue to rise as AI workloads proliferate across a variety of industries and organizations increasingly leverage hybrid cloud architecture. Recognizing these trends, Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) has been increasing its focus on networking to meet the demands of existing infrastructure customers and further differentiate from its main infrastructure OEM competitors.  

 

Meanwhile, Juniper Networks also identified opportunities presented by trends in AI and hybrid cloud, understanding that customers were seeking simplified networking solutions with an emphasis on flexibility in consumption and deployment. As such, the company prioritized the expansion of capabilities associated with empowering cloud-managed, AI-enabled networking operations. 

HPE’s Road to Enterprise Networking Prominence Began with Aruba

With the development of mobile technologies enabling internet-based data transmission, enterprises began to realize the need for network modernization, supporting the ramping of cloud-driven digital transformation initiatives in the early 2010s. This gave rise to the wireless or mobile enterprise model, which is a near requirement in today’s business landscape.  

 

However, at this time, HPE’s networking expertise was somewhat limited to wired switching. The company knew it would have to expand its portfolio of wireless mobility solutions to remain competitive, and in March 2015, HPE announced plans to acquire Aruba Networks, a leading provider of network access solutions for the mobile enterprise.  

 

After closing the acquisition in May 2015, HPE immediately began to see a return on its investment, with the company’s networking segment revenue growing approximately 8% year-to-year in 2015, driven primarily by Aruba’s inorganic revenue contribution to the business, which centered on wireless local area network (WLAN) products.  

 

In addition to accreditive top-line impacts, the Aruba acquisition drove increasing gross profitability at the corporate level. Over the next few years, HPE leaned further into the WLAN space, leveraging its acquired Aruba assets. In 2018 HPE reorganized its reporting structure, forming its Intelligent Edge segment, which consists of two subsegments, HPE Aruba Products and HPE Aruba Services, and unified the company’s WLAN, campus and branch switching, and edge compute networking solutions. 

 

The formation of HPE’s Intelligent Edge segment promoted deeper portfolio synergies, supporting the development of new Aruba software and services offerings, including “as a Service” and consumption models for the Intelligent Edge portfolio of products, which benefited the company’s GreenLake “as a Service” business, boosting HPE’s annual recurring revenue (ARR) and the strength of the company’s Network as a Service (NaaS) capabilities. 

 

The importance of HPE’s Intelligent Edge segment as it relates to the company’s corporate performance was further underscored in recent years as demand for traditional servers and storage stagnated and began to decline due largely to market cyclicality. In the trailing 12-month (TTM) period ending 3Q22, HPE’s compute and storage revenues fell 10.2% and 6.3% year-to-year, respectively, while Intelligent Edge segment revenue soared, growing 41.6% year-to-year.  

 

To further contextualize the segment’s growth, what started out as 9.9% of HPE’s total revenues in 2018 quickly grew to represent 13.3% of the company’s revenue in 2022, and in the nine months ended 3Q22, Intelligent Edge contributed over 19% of the company’s corporate top line. On top of this, since 2020 Intelligent Edge has contributed a disproportionately high amount to total segment operating income relative to the segment’s revenue contribution. In 2020, 2021 and 2022, Intelligent Edge accounted for 13.4%, 15.9% and 18.1% of HPE’s total segment operating income, respectively, highlighting the opportunity to provide high-value products and services to customers.  

Juniper’s Cloud-managed, AI-enabled Networking Solutions and Expertise Add Another Dimension to HPE’s Intelligent Edge Portfolio

As more and more organizations embarked on cloud-driven digital transformation journeys, it became clear that consumption and deployment flexibility were key priorities among most organizations. Recognizing this, Juniper acquired Mist Systems, a leader in AI-powered, cloud-managed wireless networks, in 2019. Mist’s AI-driven WLAN platform was a strong complement to Juniper’s wired LAN, SD-WAN and security solutions, laying the groundwork for Juniper’s Mist AI platform, which has been key to the company’s growth since the closing of the acquisition. 

 

In 2020 Juniper continued its acquisition spree with the purchase of 128 Technology, a networking company known for its session-smart networking technology that enables customers to create user-experience-centric fabric for WAN connectivity that is not only simplified and secured but also efficient and agile, basing networking decisions on real-time user sessions as opposed to static network policies. By incorporating 128 Technology’s session-smart technology into Juniper’s AI-driven enterprise network portfolio, Juniper sought to accelerate the adoption and development of modern AI-driven networks aimed at optimizing the user experience from edge to cloud. 

 

Through these acquisitions, Juniper became a leader in AI-driven enterprise networking, which supported the company’s expanding top line. In the TTM periods ending 3Q20, 3Q21 and 3Q22, Juniper’s AI-Driven Enterprise operating segment revenue, which includes Mist and Technology 128 offerings, has grown 20.4%, 22.7% and 45.9%, respectively, year-to-year. For context, Juniper’s corporate revenue expanded just 5.1%, 10.6% and 9.6%, respectively, year-to-year over the same TTM periods, highlighting Juniper’s focus on AI-Driven Enterprise as well as the market’s strong appetite for these offerings. 

HPE to Solidify Its Presence as an Industry Leader in the Networking Space by Integrating Juniper’s Mist AI Platform into its Existing Portfolio

Juniper’s portfolio of solutions somewhat overlaps that of HPE; however, much of this overlap is complementary. For example, both companies have competency in WLAN, SD-WAN, and enterprise and campus switching, but Juniper’s AI-native networking technology and expertise will bolster the capabilities of HPE’s existing offerings.  

 

Uniquely, Juniper’s Mist AI platform leverages AI, machine learning and other data science techniques to simplify operations across wireless access, wired access and SD-WAN domains in a way that optimizes the user experience from the edge to the cloud. Essentially, Mist AI brings greater insight and automation to network operators, which improves the end-user experience and is a compelling reason why HPE is moving to acquire the company. Additionally, Juniper’s portfolio lends HPE net-new competencies around WAN routing as well as network firewalls. 

 

HPE has been vocal in expressing its commitment to grow its highly profitable Intelligent Edge segment revenue stream as the company recognizes the massive opportunity presented by the onset of the generative AI (GenAI) revolution. Should the acquisition close, HPE is expecting to double its networking business, integrating Juniper’s solutions and expertise, especially as it relates to the Mist AI platform, with its own rapidly expanding Intelligent Edge segment.  

 

By integrating Juniper’s Mist AI platform with its existing technologies and offerings, HPE will further differentiate from its infrastructure OEM peers as an AI-driven networking provider, building a networking portfolio rivaling that of Cisco (Nasdaq: CSCO). However, HPE’s acquisition of Juniper would arguably propel HPE’s portfolio past that of Cisco and other major networking players in terms of technological advancement specifically through an AI-driven networking lens. Juniper’s deep relationships with telcos and service providers and the company’s large router install base will also expand HPE’s addressable market.  

 

Similar to how HPE integrated Aruba’s management platform into GreenLake, should the Juniper acquisition close, TBR expects HPE will fold Juniper software and services into GreenLake, bolstering HPE’s GreenLake for Networking solution, formerly GreenLake for Aruba. This anticipated move would enhance HPE’s GreenLake value proposition compared to Dell APEX and Lenovo TruScale while fueling continued GreenLake ARR growth, supporting the company’s edge-to-cloud strategy and improving its profitability.  

 

Additionally, TBR believes that if the acquisition closes, HPE will integrate Juniper’s product offerings into HPE’s “as a Service” portfolio, further augmenting the company’s NaaS offerings. 

Peraton Could Surpass $8B in Sales in 2024, but Will It Go Public?

Updated: Sept. 9, 2024

Will Peraton Issue an IPO?

As Peraton considers going public, it needs to generate predictable revenue and profit streams to avoid pitfalls like failing to meet the company’s forecasted metrics. When the Carlyle Group took Booz Allen Hamilton public in 2010, it ensured investors that the business was in a position to keep expanding and succeed long-term. Peraton’s and Veritas’ leadership teams will undoubtedly take a similar approach. Peraton has become increasingly competitive over the years, and TBR believes it has facilitated sales expansion each year, but it remains to be seen whether Peraton is fully realizing the benefits of cost-saving measures or if it is consistently meeting its revenue goals. If it is not doing either, it will not go public.

 

General Dynamics Information Technology (GDIT) and other unencumbered industry peers have been making rapid investments in emerging technologies like generative AI over the last few years. With Peraton no longer focused on fully integrating its assets, it began to broaden its AI and cloud capabilities more noticeably during 2023 by pursuing strategic relationships with SoftIron and UiPath. These two partnerships, in particular, enable Peraton to leverage SoftIron’s HyperCloud technology as well as the UiPath Business Automation Platform while the company helps clients with establishing their respective cloud networks and streamlining their workflows.
TBR anticipates that Peraton will continue to expand its partner network to operate as a cloud services broker. Peraton is positioning itself to capitalize on federal agencies that are increasingly utilizing an “as a Service” cloud environment model to build their own platforms with desired third-party capabilities as well as the steady funding to accelerate agencies’ digital modernization journeys, which is expected to persist for the foreseeable future.

 

If Peraton falters with this strategy, it can still continue pursuing opportunities related to next-generation national security. TBR estimates that approximately 45% of Peraton’s sales in 2023 came from the DOD and the IC. Peraton focuses on underpinning missions of consequence that have high barriers of entry and receive bipartisan funding, like protecting space systems, in addition to supporting national security initiatives.

 

Veritas disclosed in 3Q24 that it had over $40 billion in assets under management. With interest rates expected to remain at elevated levels through 2024, it is unlikely Veritas will make any more multibillion-dollar acquisitions to further augment Peraton. Veritas has demonstrated flexible ownership over the years to work with Peraton. While Veritas has helped take Peraton to new heights and could pursue a sub-$200 million acquisition to broaden Peraton’s capabilities with emerging technologies, Veritas will cash out sooner rather than later.

 

Peraton has undergone several high-profile leadership changes this year but the most notable announcement is that Steve Schorer will succeed Stu Shea as CEO, president and chairman of the board in September. Schorer was the CEO of Alion Science and Technology before it was acquired by Huntington Ingalls Industries in 2021. Most recently, Schorer has been operating as a senior advisor at Veritas Capital. TBR remains confident that Peraton will go public in 2025 given its recent activity.

Peraton in 2024

The megamerger has given Peraton the necessary portfolio depth and scale to regularly vie with industry leaders such as Leidos for enterprise IT contracts in the $500 million to $2 billion range in the federal civilian and health spaces while also capitalizing on Department of Defense (DOD) Intelligence Community (IC) needs. Now that Peraton’s assets are fully integrated, TBR believes that Peraton is on course to surpass $8.0 billion in annual sales during 2024.

 

Additionally, Peraton’s backlog was last reported at $24.4 billion in the middle of 2022. The company has been placing around 1,200 bids a year worth approximately $40 billion in total. Peraton has not disclosed its current operating margins.

How Peraton Septupled in Size

Private equity firm Veritas Capital officially bought Harris Corporation’s government IT services business for $690 million in 2Q17. The new assets were quickly spun into a stand-alone company, Peraton, helmed by Stu Shea to pursue opportunities in the communications, cybersecurity and space markets.

 

When he was first brought on as Peraton’s president, CEO and chairman of the board, Shea expected that Veritas would financially back his plans for three years before cashing out since the fund was for five years. As part of Shea’s growth strategy, Peraton purchased Strategic Resources International to augment the company’s telecommunication services portfolio in 2Q18 and Solers in 2Q19 to expand its space capabilities. While Peraton did not share the financial values of these transactions, the latter enabled Peraton to generate over $1 billion in annual revenue.

An Arduous Integration Process

In 4Q20, more than three years after appointing Shea, Veritas’ leadership team approached him about Veritas acquiring the IT services operations of three Northrop Grumman business units (collectively referred to as NGIT) and federal IT vendor Perspecta and rolling these assets into Peraton. Veritas purchased NGIT for $3.4 billion in 1Q21, before acquiring Perspecta for $7.1 billion in 2Q21 and bolting on ViON’s cloud operations to Peraton in 3Q23.

 

Anecdotally, Peraton entered this megamerger with industry-leading margins. Following the merger, Peraton’s sales septupled to between $7.0 billion and $7.2 billion in 2021, according to TBR’s estimates, while its headcount surged from 3,500 to 24,000.

 

The largest privately owned federal IT contractor faced hundreds of thousands of obstacles at the start of this integration process, according to Shea. As the leadership team streamlined policies and processes while optimizing the business, they made several notable decisions, such as divesting the systems engineering, integration and support services business to a portfolio company of Veritas. (These assets would later become Arcfield and are still owned by Veritas.)

By divesting this business, Peraton ensured it was fostering ethical business practices by mitigating potential corporate conflicts while narrowing its focus on core operations. In addition to the divestment, Peraton reduced its physical footprint from 150 facilities to less than 100. The company also made sweeping workforce rationalizations, shrinking its post-merger headcount from 24,000 in 2021 to 18,000 by the end of 2022. Concurrent with implementing these optimization efforts, Peraton had to contend with an array of impeding factors that plagued other vendors across the industry including supply chain disruptions, macro inflation and a sustained bid protest environment.

 

Despite this onslaught of obstacles, Peraton has been able to consistently disrupt in the public sector market. The company has been able to successfully compete with Tier 1 vendors to secure high-profile contracts such as the Special Operations Forces IT Enterprise Contract III worth up to $2.8 billion. By August 2022, Shea claimed Peraton only had a few hundred items left to address in its integration master schedule.

PwC Stepping Up When Technology Fails to Deliver Value

In late November 2023, TBR and PwC Transformation Consulting Solutions Leader Tom Puthiyamadam continued a decadelong discussion about the consulting business model, reflecting on changes wrought by the pandemic, technology ecosystem partnerships and generative AI (GenAI).  According to PwC’s assessment, technology investments have not delivered the business value or transformative effects enterprises have expected over the last decade. Implementing the latest ERP does not, in itself, deliver growth, and moving workloads to the cloud does not, unrelentingly, reduce costs. Just as commuters have not taken off in the flying cars that “The Jetsons” promised, business leaders have not seen technology provide transformational results.

Technology Is Easier to Use but Harder to Make Useful — and Still No Flying Cars

For PwC, a new year and a hot new technology, GenAI, provide an opportunity to reassess how consultancies and IT services vendors bring value to their clients, first by defining credible, meaningful business outcomes and then creating a value chain back into the technology, process and operations stacks. What does that actually mean? According to Puthiyamadam and other PwC leaders involved in the discussions with TBR, the starting point is defining business value transformation — a desired end state — and then delivering on trust, transparency and speed.

 

Taking the 10,000-foot view, PwC leaders noted that technology as a whole has been getting easier, perhaps even more so now in the GenAI age. No-code and low-code platforms, visualizations, and GenAI-enabled programs like Microsoft’s Copilot all support a trend toward making technology easier to understand and deploy.

 

Notably, in Puthiyamadam’s words, “The old hard part is still the hard part. Can you stitch it all together? Can you get people to work differently? Can you drive behavioral changes in an enterprise?” And most critically, can a consultancy “deliver on CFO-level outcomes in 12 weeks, not 12 months?”

 

Repeatedly, PwC Consulting leaders came back to a fundamental point around how clients view consultancies: How fast can they deliver measurable, meaningful outcomes? Experience, expertise, technology skills and even scale are table stakes. Speed, combined with quality and at a fair price, matters most.
 

IT services and consulting in 2024: Traversing GenAI pressures, talent challenges and regulatory wavesDownload Your Free Copy of TBR’s Top Predictions for IT Services and Consulting Markets in 2024, featuring expert insights into GenAI’s impact on outcomes-based pricing and the major pain point for all in the new year

  

NASCAR and the Factory Approach: What PwC Can Do Differently

Embracing what PwC leaders have called a “factory approach” to technology-infused professional services engagements allows PwC to reassure clients that the firm is purpose-built when it comes to people, scale, expertise and price.

 

Critically, PwC reassures clients’ IT professionals that the firm provides advisory and support services, availability, and integrated technologies but does not wholly replace those IT professionals’ roles within their organization.

 

In TBR’s view, PwC’s recognition that a standardized, scaled business model — the factory approach — combined with high-touch consulting could actually assuage fears around job disruption may prove critical in coming years as GenAI permeates IT services, generating more uncertainty and fear. Paired with the focus on measurable business outcomes, PwC’s factory approach could help separate the firm from peers.

 

During the discussions with TBR, PwC leaders acknowledged that many enterprise clients struggle with technical debt but challenged the idea that this debt constitutes the biggest obstacle to realizing digital transformation value. Instead, PwC suggested process debt — the ingrained operational tasks, flows and interdependencies — has also accumulated at enterprises, slowing efforts to gain value from the technology (digital) or the business (transformation) investments in digital transformation.

 

PwC leaders further suggested process debt at many enterprises had reached levels that demand attention, even at the cost of additional technical debt. Here, according to PwC, the firm helps clients gain maximum use from current technology investments, finding additional value while accelerating transformation to new (and better) processes with, as needed, new technologies.

 

In TBR’s view, a NASCAR pit crew analogy Puthiyamadam invoked multiple times seemed most appropriate in discussing how PwC could help clients with both their processes and technology. Changing tires fast requires not just better tools but also practice, teamwork and performing under pressure. In an increasingly competitive and budget-constrained IT services and consulting market, bringing NASCAR-like precision and speed to digital transformations will be expected of leading vendors.

Business Value Realization and the Art of Keeping Everyone Honest

Speeding and crashing provides no value on the track or to a business, bringing into play the other two elements PwC sees as critical to a new way of framing consulting: trust and transparency. PwC leaders told TBR that the firm has increasingly been bringing a private equity mindset to its clients’ value realization.

 

Rather than taking three years to fully understand the value of a technology-enabled change, PwC and its clients have been constantly examining ongoing work, determining on a monthly basis whether the expected value continues to be reflected in current progress. The transparency around business value realization — critically here actual measurable business value, not just technology milestones — builds trust and enables speed. PwC has had to reorient its ways of working, reinvigorate its technology training, and build the business model agility to take on financial risks as a way of “keeping everyone honest,” in Puthiyamadam’s assessment.

 

As he pointed out, PwC can help with “modernizing the core while improving the business, realizing value from existing technology. … The client can hit ‘pause’ if they’re not believing [PwC is] going to hit value.”

 

Further on PwC itself, PwC leaders reiterated to TBR that the firm has been training strategists on emerging technologies, an effort that began globally years ago with the Digital Fitness app and has continued to be a learning and development priority. Assessing management consulting overall, Puthiyamadam stated that consultants who are not “trilingual will be irrelevant really soon, if not already. Design, business value, and technology. Must speak all three.”

 

Critically, PwC leaders in the discussion added that the firm’s consultants focused on working within the existing technology stack at their clients, accepting the technology environment that they are in and recognizing that perfect is the enemy of progress. Combining what PwC does for itself and what it brings clients, PwC leaders further elaborated that as clients bring new technologies into their IT stack those clients need the full suite of change management, learning and professional development, and product management critical to successful technology deployments.

 

In TBR’s view, the near-term disruptions in the management consulting and IT services space will require many traditional services — ones that PwC has experience with and credibility around, in part by applying those services directly to the firm.

Does PwC Have the New Consulting Business Model? If So, TBR Is Here for It

TBR might not be quite as gloomy as some of PwC’s consulting leaders on the failures of technology to date — we may yet see flying taxis in Paris next summer — but we agree fully that most enterprise information technology has been oversold and has under-delivered in terms of overall business value. PwC’s focus on getting the most from technology that clients have already acquired and addressing process debt, those sticky business problems that prevent the full value of technology or digital transformation from taking hold, all while delivering value quickly and transparently strikes TBR as a smart strategy to address an ecosystemwide problem.

 

There is an old saying, “You can have it fast or good or cheap, but not all three.” PwC is challenging that formulation by saying you can have fast and good, and you will always know what you are paying for and what you are getting, even in a previously nebulously defined area like management consulting. And to back it up, PwC will put its own fees at risk, knowing that value will be evaluated every three months, at least, if not more frequently.

 

To TBR, this approach echoes the recent attention around financial operations, in which enterprise IT buyers ask how much value they are getting from software, platforms and cloud. At frequent intervals, PwC assesses the value it is bringing to clients with no further steps and no further action until the expected value is understood and credibly on track. Is PwC disrupting the consulting business model? In TBR’s view, there is no better time for it.

Reliable, Proven and High-functioning: HCLTech’s Cloud-native and GenAI Labs

HCLTech considers the “art of the possible” to be what clients can deploy at scale in the near term. In HCLTech’s Cloud Native Labs, “the possible” is grounded completely in what can be done, not what is theoretically possible. In a decade of visiting innovation and transformation centers, TBR has heard every version of blue-sky creativity and out-of-the-box thinking but cannot recall another IT services vendor definitively connecting “the possible” to “deployable at scale.” 

Grounding the ‘Art of the Possible’

Gracechurch Street Cloud Native Lab Echoes HCLTech’s Fundamentals

In fall 2023, TBR met with Alan Flower, EVP, CTO and global head, Cloud Native & AI Labs; Tom De Vos, Google Cloud Platform (GCP) cloud native architect; and Mani Nagasundaram, global head of Cloud Sales, Financial Services, at HCLTech’s Gracechurch Street Cloud Native Lab, one of a network of HCLTech’s worldwide labs, including a Software Defined Infrastructure Lab in Chennai, India, and a Scale Digital Delivery Center and Digital Innovation Lab in Amsterdam.
 
The HCLTech leaders described in detail the kinds of challenges clients bring to them in the labs as well as why clients come to HCLTech. In use case after use case, the following three elements in HCLTech’s approach in the labs and overall approach to technology and IT services resonated with TBR particularly well based on our experience and view of HCLTech’s peers and ecosystem partners:

 

  • Engineering credibility — HCLTech has always stood out among the large India-centric IT services vendors for its engineering DNA, a mindset that seems to permeate every aspect of the company’s solutions and engagements. Flower first mentioned his company’s engineering legacy in the context of how his teams approach clients’ problems. Then De Vos described a critical element in HCLTech’s engagements at the labs, saying that clients know they are going to be able to “flip a switch” and have a working, materially important solution, not just a PowerPoint presentation or road map.
  • Sustained engagement — HCLTech’s leaders repeatedly described client engagements that extended over multiple lab visits, whether on-site, virtual, or even set up in the client’s facility. While client selection — who comes to the labs and for what kinds of work — is not handled lightly, HCLTech clearly maintains flexibility with respect to how clients can tap into the time and expertise of the HCLTech professionals at the various labs worldwide, reflecting the company’s desire and ability to deliver on client objectives with its portfolio and resources over relying entirely on transactional volume.
  • Commitment to relationships — For HCLTech, delivering on client objectives includes keeping the Cloud Native Labs and the entire labs network part of the relationship beyond the contract. Flower repeatedly noted that the labs function as an asset that HCLTech can bring to clients to jump-start problem solving and move from strategic decisions around technology choices and approaches to the training and cultural change management needed to sustain a solution beyond the MVP and pilot stages. That commitment came through in both the use cases Flower described and HCLTech’s understanding that these labs are decidedly not a direct revenue generation source but a critical component to HCLTech’s overall strategy.

 

Technology-centric Cultural Change Management

While HCLTech’s Cloud Native Labs share many attributes with other innovation and transformation centers, including the need to showcase capabilities, challenges managing which clients attend sessions, and opportunities for internal training and skills development, TBR believes these labs could be a blueprint for other IT services vendors, particularly as the entire cloud ecosystem faces disruptions from shifting client expectations and the opportunities around generative AI (GenAI).
 
No client arrives at a consultancy’s or IT services vendor’s innovation and transformation center completely unaware of emerging technologies, nor do any enterprises have blank slate or pristine technology environments. So when informed clients potentially laden with technology debt arrive at HCLTech’s Cloud Native Labs, the shared mandate to get to a deployable-at-scale solution to a clearly defined (and addressable) problem likely resonates extremely well with clients, in large part because HCLTech continues to engage most frequently with technologists and practitioners, the people tasked with making the tech work at an enterprise.
 
That said, Flower and De Vos repeatedly noted that HCLTech understands the cultural change management needed for any technology solution to scale. Consulting, yes, but within the context of HCLTech’s engineering and technology-problem-solving strengths.

Partnering with the Right Hyperscaler — All 3 of Them

Putting HCLTech’s Cloud Native Labs in context of other consulting and IT services vendors’ innovation and transformation centers necessarily sets aside the cloud focus of these labs. On that point, Flower and De Vos consistently stressed the importance of HCLTech’s hyperscaler partners, including (in no particular order), Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT), Amazon Web Services (AWS) (Nasdaq: AMZN) and Google (Nasdaq: GOOGL).
 
Notably, HCLTech partners closely with RedHat, and the HCLTech executives repeatedly referenced use cases that featured Red Hat’s and IBM’s (NYSE: IBM) technologies. As TBR has previously examined, how consultancies and IT services vendors manage their ecosystem partners at their innovation and transformation centers (and labs) reveals differences in strategic thinking and intent.
 
While full-on branding remains rare and having technology partners’ staff permanently on-site is even more rare, consultancies and IT services vendors have become adept at including technology partners as part of clients’ experiences, almost always when the client has already committed to a particular tech stack (ask us about what happens when a particular Germany-based ERP partner is not in the room). HCLTech remains committed to partnering with a broad ecosystem, following leads from its clients and undoubtedly serving those clients well.
 
Had Flower and De Vos not shared a use case in which a hyperscaler specifically recommended HCLTech to a client — suggesting Flower, De Vos and the rest of the team were best positioned to help the client solve their cloud-related problems — TBR would have questioned how successfully HCLTech balanced being cloud vendor agnostic with meeting clients where they are in terms of their existing technology environments and needs. That a cloud vendor could definitively recommend HCLTech to a client indicates HCLTech, aided by the sustained investment in Cloud Native Labs, has made a compelling case to the cloud vendors.
 
One further note on cloud partners: TBR persistently pushed Flower and De Vos to distinguish between Microsoft Azure, AWS and Google Cloud Platform and detail differences in HCLTech’s alliances. While refusing to pick favorites, the HCLTech leaders described multiple use cases involving each partner, demonstrating a breadth of client challenges and HCLTech solutions and establishing a credibility around HCLTech’s cloud-agnostic strategy.

Cannot Have GenAI Without Cloud (and Cannot Talk Tech Without GenAI)

One cannot have a technology-centric meeting without discussing GenAI. TBR and HCLTech’s Cloud Native Lab leaders shared mostly synchronized views on the implications and opportunities around GenAI, agreeing that infrastructure players and consultancies should see immediate spikes in engagements and revenues. Long term, HCLTech’s focus on security, responsible AI and intimate collaboration with hyperscalers should prove beneficial.
 
Notably, HCLTech also maintains strategic partnerships with Dell Technologies (NYSE: Dell) and Intel (Nasdaq: INTC), two technology vendors that are well positioned to provide the necessary infrastructure to a GenAI adoption wave. Overall, HCLTech’s sobriety around GenAI struck TBR as refreshingly honest. In a setting conducive to blue-sky ideas and bleeding-edge technology musings, HCLTech’s Cloud Native Lab leaders kept the discussion grounded.
 
In a TBR blog, we discussed how GenAI will likely affect IT services vendors like HCLTech: “When looking at the IT services and professional services space, TBR considers two GenAI tracks: What opportunities will vendors seize for generating new revenues, and what changes will GenAI force on how vendors operate? Currently, the first track is pretty straightforward: Fear, uncertainty and doubt around GenAI — fueled by massive hype — create consulting opportunities, particularly for vendors with established governance, risk and compliance offerings.
 
Every vendor has core artificial intelligence, data orchestration, analytics and cloud capabilities, so no vendor can credibly separate itself from the pack with those tools alone. … On the second track, GenAI could be highly disruptive, especially around managed services, to include changes to the staffing pyramid, as less experienced employees either shift to higher-value tasks or leave.”
 
Reflecting on the GenAI discussion with Flower and De Vos, TBR believes HCLTech could begin to separate itself from IT services peers by emphasizing a grounded practicality mindset and a focus on bringing real solutions to scale, even when discussing the potential disruptions of GenAI.

Being Productive in a Time of Chaos and Uncertainty

Grounded and concrete. Partnering smartly and focused on what can possibly scale within clients’ existing or near-term environment. In TBR’s view, HCLTech’s Cloud Native Labs have positioned themselves well for what will likely be an exceptionally turbulent time in the cloud and IT services space. HCLTech effectively uses the Cloud Native Labs as a platform to showcase its plethora of products from the HCLSoftware division and helps clients integrate the same into the overall solution architecture.
 
Clients’ dissatisfaction with costs and unbridled enthusiasm for GenAI will create unrealistic expectations. Competitive pressures around IT services and hyperscalers’ need to find growth will challenge pricing and engagement models. HCLTech has a reliable, proven, highly functioning cloud lab ecosystem that should be a safe space for clients, technology partners and HCLTech professionals to productively manage through the coming craziness.
 
TBR will highlight HCLTech’s Cloud Native Labs in the next Innovation and Transformation Centers Market Landscape and continue to cover the company in quarterly reports, TBR’s IT Services Benchmark, and in 2024 in TBR’s Cloud Ecosystems Market Landscape.   

 

The Telecom Industry Will be Calculated in Its Progression to 6G to Ensure Meaningful ROI

Approximately 250 attendees representing entities including telecom network vendors, communication service providers (CSPs), technology companies, regulators, academia, and experts from multiple nontelecom industries converged on the 2023 Brooklyn 6G Summit in late October. The event was hosted by Nokia and NYU Wireless and covered a wide range of topics relevant to 6G, including ICT industry trends, regulatory impacts, the metaverse, AI, vertical use cases, and cloud-native network infrastructure.

TBR Perspective on Telecom Industry Progression to 6G

The 2023 Brooklyn 6G Summit highlighted both the optimism and uncertainty the telecom industry is experiencing as it progresses from the 5G era, which is about halfway through its developmental cycle, to the 6G era, which is expected to commence in 2028, when the first 6G specification in 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Release 21 is finalized.
 
Initial commercial 6G network deployments are expected by 2030. The sentiments of optimism and uncertainty around 6G were discussed throughout the event, including in a keynote from AT&T’s EVP of Technology Chris Sambar in which he expressed concerns regarding the ROI of 6G.
 
Sambar stated, “We’re getting a little bit worn out with the economics of the industry” to summarize the challenges AT&T and other operators are currently experiencing in light of high investment costs and limited monetization opportunities in the 5G era. Sambar also remarked, “To be completely honest and transparent, the industry has questions on what is 6G going to bring us, what are the use cases that customers want from 6G and frankly, what is it going to cost us.”
 
Sambar’s keynote, which was one of the initial sessions at the 6G Summit, set the tone for the rest of the event as speakers candidly assessed the current state of the 5G market while discussing the benefits and use cases that are expected to materialize during the 6G era. Though 6G technical specifications and expected use cases are still in the developmental stages, TBR believes operators will be more calculated and tactical in investing in 6G compared to 5G, with a deeper emphasis on ensuring a clear line of sight to ROI before significant spending occurs.
 

Download your free copy of TBR′s 2024 Telecom Predictions special report

Telecom Industry Retrenches in Response to Macroeconomic Pressures


 

Impact and Opportunities

Lessons Learned From 5G Era Provide Blueprint to Optimize 6G Deployments

Speakers discussed missteps during the 5G era and the importance of not repeating those mistakes in deploying 6G. A key theme was that the launch of multiple variants of 5G in the U.S. — described as “50 shades of 5G” by an event participant — was ultimately a misstep that was impacted by premature marketing. This trend was exemplified by the initial launch of 5G services in the U.S. over low-band spectrum providing only marginal performance benefits compared to LTE, which in turn created a generally tepid initial impression of 5G from consumers.
 
Another notable example was the launch of 5G non-standalone (5G NSA) prior to the deployment of 5G standalone (5G SA). Though 5G NSA enabled operators to launch commercial 5G services faster, 5G NSA lacks key benefits enabled by 5G SA, including faster data speeds, enhanced security, and the ability to support network slicing and lower latency use cases. The separate launches of 5G NSA and 5G SA in turn created complexities and misunderstandings for consumers and enterprises.
 
Event participants noted these challenges experienced within the 5G era will help guide the industry as it creates more cohesive 6G strategies that will enable operators to optimize network spending, provide more tangible initial benefits to customers, and minimize premature marketing of services. Key focus areas for the industry in 6G development include optimizing spectrum allocations for 6G as well as establishing unified global technology standards for 6G to minimize fragmentation in the market. For instance, participants at the event noted it would be beneficial for the industry to determine during the earlier stages of standards development if 6G will be deployed on its own separate network core or existing 5G cores and for operators to adhere to one deployment model to avoid the complexities created by 5G NSA and 5G SA.

The Clearance of 6G Spectrum Will be Vital in Supporting Continued Growth in Data Traffic

Despite the early stages of 6G use cases and the uncertainties around monetization opportunities, operators will need to invest in 6G to remain competitive with each other and support escalating data traffic long-term as 6G is projected to support a 10x increase in usage on networks. The clearance of additional spectrum in the U.S. will be essential to support 6G and for the country to remain at the forefront of the global wireless market, as Sambar cited that the U.S. currently ranks No. 10 worldwide in licensed midband spectrum allocation. Key spectrum ranges Nokia expects 6G to be deployed on include the 7GHz-20GHz frequencies to support outdoor cell sites in urban markets, low-band spectrum in the 470MHz-694MHz range to maximize coverage, and sub-terahertz spectrum to provide peak data speeds in localized areas.
 
The National Spectrum Strategy, which was released by the Biden administration in November 2023, will help in advancing spectrum development in the U.S. The strategy identifies 2,786MHz of airwaves to study in the near term for new uses, including 5G and 6G. The strategy identifies five spectrum bands for study: 3.1GHz-3.45GHz, 5,030MHz-5,091MHz, 7,125MHz-8,400MHz, 18.1GHz-18.6GHz, and 37GHz-37.6GHz.

More Efficient Network Technologies Will be a Primary Use Case for 6G

Various potential 6G use cases were discussed at the summit, though the time frame for commercial readiness and the willingness of customers to pay for these solutions remain unknown. Many of the use cases discussed involved extended reality (XR) technologies such as AR and VR and included the metaverse and real-world simulations to provide training for users including military personnel and first responders. Use cases around autonomous vehicles, advanced robotics, drones and 8K video were also discussed.
 
TBR expects the most beneficial use cases for 6G will involve the provisioning of advanced technologies that will enable operators to more cost-efficiently support rising traffic on their networks. For instance, deeper implementation of artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies will enable operators to enhance self-optimizing network (SON) capabilities to realize cost efficiencies. 6G is also expected to result in deeper implementation of digital twins, which will help operators better anticipate potential outcomes to their networks and optimize their operations in areas including site management and field operations. Additionally, 6G is expected to be significantly more energy efficient compared to 5G, which will enable operators to improve cost efficiencies while helping to support corporate sustainability goals.
 

Conclusion

The 2023 Brooklyn 6G Summit provided an optimistic yet realistic outlook on the potential of 6G. The telecom industry is particularly concerned regarding the revenue opportunity provided by 6G given the current state of the 5G market. Despite the uncertainty of revenue-generating 6G customer use cases, investments in 6G will likely benefit operators in the long term due to the technology’s ability to support escalating traffic more cost-efficiently on their networks.

AWS Aims to Reinvent GenAI Through Infrastructure Layer, Platform Tools and Applications

Amazon Web Services’ (AWS) 12th annual re:Invent conference was, unsurprisingly, all about generative AI (GenAI). The five-day event showcased all the ways AWS enables this budding technology — which Amazon CEO Andy Jassy claims will add tens of billions of dollars to AWS’ top line — not just through the infrastructure layer AWS is known for, but also through the company’s platform tools and applications. 

AWS Set Out to re:Invent infrastructure over a decade ago and is prepared to do the same with GenAI

Dating back to the dot-com bubble and the early days of amazon.com, Amazon gained an understanding of what it takes to provision infrastructure designed to scale at massive volumes. After Amazon spent years trying to overcome scale challenges associated with bringing third-party merchants to its e-commerce engine, AWS was born.
 
Despite all the competition it has welcomed over the past 10 years, AWS is still largely credited with not only pioneering cloud infrastructure but also making it accessible to anyone. As articulated by AWS CEO Adam Selipsky, this could range from a college student using a laptop in their dorm room to some of the most sophisticated enterprises in the world. But largely owed to the pandemic, we have seen the cloud market shift from a data center outsourcing strategy to a tangential business driver, which means AWS has had to adapt alongside its clients with not just traditional hosting services but also full-stack solutions tied to a specific use case.
 
One of the most compelling customer examples highlighting this approach includes Pfizer. At the height of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021, Pfizer pledged to expand its cloud footprint from 10% to 80%. Put another way, Pfizer migrated 12,000 applications and 8,000 servers in 42 weeks, which resulted in $47 million in annual savings and the closure of three data centers. This seemingly successful, large-scale transformation has Pfizer now exploring AWS’ GenAI technologies, including Bedrock, to automate manual processes and realize a projected $750 million to $1 billion in annual cost savings.
 
This customer example speaks to the powerful influence AWS’ infrastructure has with clients such as Pfizer — which needed to submit data to the Food and Drug Administration in a matter of days during COVID-19 — that prioritize speed, scale and agility. Holding a significant portion of the cloud infrastructure layer, AWS is looking up the stack to tackle cloud’s next big reinvention: GenAI.
 

Download your free copy of TBR′s 2024 Cloud Predictions special report

GenAI: A Growth Catalyst for Cloud Evolution in 2024 and Beyond


 

A closer look at AWS’ GenAI stack

Selipsky’s overview of the AWS GenAI stack was consistent with the commentary Jassy has provided on Amazon earnings calls over the past couple of quarters. Here is a quick look at AWS’ GenAI capabilities and some of the new innovations:

  • Infrastructure: While a great talking point for AWS, we cannot argue the fact that scalable compute serves as the foundation for all things GenAI. For AWS, this includes both custom chips and NVIDIA (Nasdaq: NVDA) GPUs. AWS used re:Invent to launch innovations in both areas, including Amazon Trainium 2 instances (Trn2), which promises a fourfold performance increase over Trn1 for machine learning inference workloads, and NVIDIA DGX Cloud on AWS. The latter is particularly interesting and comes as all other cloud providers have already signed on as hosting partners for NVIDIA’s DGX AI software. As the first company to put GPUs in the cloud, AWS has a unique relationship with NVIDIA, but one that may be growing more contentious as sales teams push AWS’ own chips as part of a cost optimization play designed to maximize customers’ lifetime value. Even so, NVIDIA’s supplier power is significant, and thus the company has a lot of bargaining power with the hyperscalers, which need NVIDIA to supply GPUs to their data centers, and in return, can host DGX and support NVIDIA’s push into the software space.
  • Platform tools and “as a Service” models: The middle layer of AWS’ GenAI stack is largely synonymous with Amazon Bedrock, a managed service used by 10,000-plus customers to access and customize foundation models for their GenAI apps. Making sure customers are not beholden to one model provider and can access an array of options through the same API interface is key to AWS’ strategy. It also contrasts with Microsoft’s (Nasdaq: MSFT) approach and helps AWS position itself as an open and flexible alternative. New models supported via Bedrock include Anthropic’s Claude 2.1, which has a context window of roughly 150,000 words — making it well suited for legal and finance use cases — in addition to internal models, like Amazon Titan Multimodal Embeddings. Breadth of models is key, but improving the native functionality within Bedrock garners the majority of investment from AWS at this layer. This largely includes features that get customers beyond out-of-the-box models to those that can be customized, fine-tuned and applied to business use cases. One example includes Knowledge Bases for Amazon Bedrock, a Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) service that pulls data from multiple sources (i.e., databases, APIs) to help customers bring data to their models and customize.
  • GenAI applications: At the top of the stack are the actual GenAI applications built on foundation models. AWS may have a weaker association here, but this layer is important to rounding out the entire stack and keeping customers invested in AWS. This layer largely comprises Code Whisperer, the free-for-use code companion that also offers customization capability, which means the application learns from internal code to provide personalized recommendations.

It is all about breadth

With over 220 native services and 600 compute instance types, portfolio breadth has always been a hallmark attribute of AWS. For context, AWS launched 3,300 new features and services in 2022. In his opening keynote, Selipsky went as far to say that AWS offers 60% more services and 40% more features than its nearest competitor. The approach to GenAI will be no different, as AWS strives to offer the broadest set of capabilities for customers to run, build and deploy GenAI technology.
 
Even in areas where AWS lacks depth or specificity, ISV solutions prove instrumental in filling gaps and, in many cases, do more to drive up a customer’s underlying IaaS resources than AWS’ out-of-the-box services. We also know AWS has a rich history of delivering very basic services to market and quickly building them up into competitive products over time. Perhaps the best example is AWS SageMaker, which accumulated over 250 features and tens of thousands of customers in the span of six years.

 

GenAI applications: How AWS is entering the copilot race with Amazon Q

At re:Invent, AWS took a bigger leap into the GenAI applications space with the launch of Amazon Q. While incorporating natural language processing (NLP) into various services is not necessarily new to AWS, Q is a GenAI-powered assistant based on 17 years of AWS knowledge designed to bridge the gap between the technical and business-led functions in the enterprise. For example, Q will be integrated with the Code Whisperer environment so developers can ask questions like, “How do I create code for this function?” while admins can use Q in pretty much any environment (e.g., AWS Management Console, Slack, documentation) to ask questions as generic as, “How do I build a web app on AWS”?

 

But Q also connects to 40 external data sources for business-related tasks, such as data visualization and document summarization, while the assistant integrates with Amazon Connect for contact center optimization, and will soon work with AWS’ Supply Chain application launched at last year’s re:Invent. Integrating Q across functions like supply chain and customer service, in addition to the analytics stack with QuickSight, suggests AWS wants Q to be the expert assistant not just for building on AWS but also for business.

 

This approach is largely consistent with what we are seeing from competitors integrating copilots and assistants into their SaaS offerings; however, there are a couple of big contrasts between Q and Microsoft’s Copilot and Google Cloud’s (Nasdaq: GOOGL) Duet AI. This first one is pricing: Both Copilot and Duet AI are priced at $30 per month per user, while Amazon Q, though still in preview, will come in at $20 and $25 per month per user for Q Business and Q Builder editions, respectively.
 
AWS may be undercutting its competitors on price, but Microsoft’s and Google Cloud’s recognition and reach in the productivity space may prove challenging, at least in the context of including Q Business edition. Q Builder, however, may be another story. While including all the capabilities of Q Business, Q Builder is designed for AWS-specific use cases, and in general, anything AWS can do to make developers successful is going to be well received by the customer base. This could include tasks like troubleshooting applications, writing SQL queries or even migrating code. A small pool of Amazon developers tested this last capability internally to upgrade 1,000 applications from Java 8 to Java 17 in two days.

 

The other big difference is that Amazon Q leverages Bedrock, which means the GenAI assistant is pulling multiple third-party models and assigning them to the right tasks. Peers have taken a different approach, as their assistants are based on a sole provider; for Google Cloud, this is internal models like Codey, and for Microsoft, this is OpenAI’s ChatGPT. While we cannot say for certain how customers will view these approaches, for AWS, having Q based on Bedrock speaks to the company’s goal of offering a broad array of models in hopes of challenging Microsoft.

The zero-ETL integrations keep coming

Building on last year’s commitment to a zero-ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) future and the resulting integration between Redshift and Aurora, AWS launched three new zero-ETL relational and nonrelational database integrations with Redshift: Aurora PostgreSQL, RDS (Relational Database Service) and DynamoDB. Just like it wants to offer the broadest set of infrastructure options, AWS wants to ensure it has the breadth of cloud data services customers need so they do not have to compromise on the right tool for the right data task. But even if customers have an array of tools accessible to them, they still need a way to break down data silos, which requires integration.

 

To automatically connect data from source to destination and ease manual ETL processes, AWS is offering more integrations between its database and data warehouse services. We do suspect “zero-ETL” has become more of a marketing term and is essentially glorified data sharing, but there is undoubtedly value in simplifying how businesses connect and analyze data. Even before GenAI broke headlines, businesses were realizing the benefits of breaking down data silos and adopting an integrated data posture, but GenAI should only fast-track data strategies throughout the enterprises.

 

Microsoft recognized this trend years ago and recently launched Fabric, a platform that integrates multiple data services, including Synapse, which is akin to Amazon Redshift, into a single offering. Fabric is a single-source-of-truth platform that addresses the entire data cycle and charges customers based on total IaaS resources consumed, versus the compute and storage for each individual data service. AWS’ approach is different, and while customers have a suite of different data services available to them, it could take more effort for customers to stitch these services together and create a unified environment. The new zero-ETL integrations may help rectify this, but Microsoft’s single platform approach and simplified pricing model, all integrated with Copilot, will be competitive.

At AWS, “partners are the catalysts”

In the second-to-last keynote, VP Worldwide Channels and Alliances Ruba Borno discussed the critical role of partners acting as catalysts to GenAI adoption. This includes both ISVs and global systems integrators, and AWS wants to work with both parties collectively to meet a customer where they are in a journey and work backward from their needs. Delivering solutions as part of an ecosystem was a big focus of the revamped Partner Paths model two years ago, and now AWS is tasked with scaling this model to deliver the GenAI stack to customers.
 
When asked by Borno what partners can do to drive more business with AWS, Selipsky quickly called out proficiency and making sure the skills are in place to build trust with joint customers. Specializations and competencies are a big piece of proficiency and are skills customers appear to be asking for. At the event, AWS announced the general availability of specializations in resilience and cyber insurance and is also revamping its Competency, Service Delivery and Service Ready designations into one program. Another piece of advice for partners was to focus on putting the necessary resources in place to go to market with AWS, which could be anything from established business units to codeveloped centers of excellence.
 

It is always a balancing act between the vendor and partner as to who should invest what in terms of go-to-market resources to achieve collective goals. But the message during the talk between Selipsky and Borno seemed to be that AWS has all the funding, tooling and programs available to partners that can make for a successful go-to-market strategy, but the partner has to be willing to engage. Put another way, it may be difficult for some Tier 2 partners to grow their AWS business and get in on the GenAI opportunity given the massive resource scale of some of the Tier 1 competitors.
 
As an example, Accenture pledged to train 50,000 developers and technical specialists on Amazon Q and Code Whisperer over the next two years. Despite GenAI’s potential to automate labor, the technology will only broaden the vast IT skills gap, so vendors that can acquire and train the right talent will continue to outperform when it comes to doing business with AWS.
 
Lastly, Selipsky reiterated the important role partners will play in the data ecosystem. Considering it is not the actual foundation models that will differentiate the customer, but rather their data, there is an opportunity for partners here, and anything they can do to help customers establish a data layer that will pave the way for AWS’ GenAI stack will be well received.

Conclusion

While later to the GenAI movement, AWS, with its early establishment in cloud infrastructure, has actually been involved with AI for quite some time. In many ways, the company used re:Invent to raise its voice over the din of AI chatter and showcase the long-standing innovations that it aims to use to build new capabilities and play catch-up with competitors, namely Microsoft. The best example is Amazon Q, a business-focused assistant that is somewhat comparable to Microsoft Copilot, while more Redshift integrations underscore AWS’ goal of better connecting customers to other AWS services, an approach Microsoft is similarly taking with Fabric. Meanwhile, custom compute offerings will continue to serve as a landing spot for net-new workloads, and in some cases, they could be providing cost and performance benefits that help AWS become viewed as not just a hosting provider but also a long-term digital transformation partner.

 

At the end of the day, customers’ considerations of these GenAI offerings will heavily depend on their existing infrastructure footprint, level of integration required and business use case. Working with partners to land new business and maintain its IaaS leadership lays a foundation for AWS to build the broadest set of integrations, features and services. In doing so, AWS ensures it can meet clients anywhere in their journey regardless of technical requirement or business need. If properly executed, this approach will help AWS further grow off a $88 billion run rate and maintain its lead over its very fast-following peers in IaaS and PaaS.