B2B Strategic Advantage: Ecosystem Intelligence

Can your alliance partners tell your clients what makes you special? Do your alliance partners’ sales teams know what value you bring to the ecosystem? Are you sure you placed your strategic ecosystem bets on alliance partners that are well positioned for the next growth wave? Are your competitors gaining ground with your common alliance partners through sales programs, go-to-market motions and training that you are not doing?
 
Vendor consolidation and enterprise optimization of existing digital stacks have compelled IT services companies and consultancies as well as their ecosystem partners to think strategically about who to partner with and how to secure and expand their position within the ecosystem. As a result, aligning business priorities with alliance partners will allow IT services companies and consultancies to develop a more empathetic approach to technology-fatigued buyers. Additionally, understanding pricing and commercial structures backed by common knowledge management programs will elevate the value of joint services and appeal to enterprise buyers’ appreciation of a separation of labor, supported by greater transparency and accountability.

What is ecosystem intelligence for the B2B industry?

Ecosystem intelligence provides the framework and insights necessary for all parties involved to deliver value to the end customer. Establishing common governance models backed by self-accountability metrics helps guide vendors in executing against universally agreed-upon business objectives, thus maintaining ecosystem trust.
 
Ecosystem go-to-market strategies, which involve multiple vendors collaborating to deliver complex and comprehensive solutions, now drive more than half of total IT investment, and, critically, this revenue generated through ecosystem partnerships has been growing faster than the overall market, turning ecosystem intelligence-enabled insights into invaluable pillars supporting the next wave of vendors’ business model evolutions.
 
As IT budgets grow, a greater percentage of new funding will flow to companies collaborating to deliver value, in part because the complexity of solutions required by end customers necessitates a multifaceted approach involving various layers of infrastructure, software, services and networking.

Ecosystem intelligence will become a strategic advantage for B2B

In the last few years, ecosystem intelligence has eclipsed competitive intelligence as the use case most frequently leveraging TBR’s IT services, professional services, and digital transformation data and analysis, often in an effort to answer the questions above. That shift reflects three broader trends.

  • First, enterprise buyers want to deal with fewer technology vendors, increase transparency around their IT spend and realize faster returns on technology investments.
  • Second, portfolio and capability expansion — PwC has expanded into managed services, HCLTech into software, Amazon Web Services into professional services and Lenovo into consulting — has created a more fluid ecosystem, where partnering with competitors and competing against alliance partners has become the norm.
  • Third, and perhaps seeming to run as a crosscurrent to the other two trends, the best performing companies have chosen to play primarily to their strengths, staying in their lane and partnering better, rather than building out capabilities and scale.

In 2025, IT services companies and consultancies will refine their alliances, winnowing lists of 100-plus technology partners to the handful that drive more than 90% of their business, articulate a clear joint value proposition, and align at both the leadership and sales force levels. Technology-agnostic was always a bit of a fiction and in the coming years will become a description of the past and not a strategy going forward. To make all that happen, IT services companies and consultancies will invest in ecosystem intelligence and elevate alliance management within their organizations.

Learn more

Download 2025 Predictions special report: Ecosystem Intelligence: Key Strategic Changes for 2025
 
Watch TBR Insights Live session: Digital Transformation Outlook: Strategy Rebound, GenAI Impact and Ecosystems Importance in 2025

KPMG Shifts Focus to Legal Services and AI-driven Strategy Consulting 

KPMG is leaning toward legal services and AI-infused strategy consulting offerings to bolster sales as the firm navigates choppy market conditions within core deal advisory

Earlier in January news reports surfaced that a subsidiary of KPMG, KPMG Law US, had applied to operate in Arizona under a state program allowing nonlawyers to operate law firms and provide legal services in the state. This aligns with our Fall 2024 Management Consulting Benchmark Vendor Profile: KPMG, in which we discussed this topic.
 
KPMG’s revenue growth decelerated from 0.7% year-to-year in 1H23 to -0.6% year-to-year in 1H24 as the firm continued to face pressure in core markets such as deal advisory despite the uptick in signings — a trend we expect to continue into 2025 as we estimate management consulting sales to stay flat on an annual basis. Over the last six months, KPMG signed M&A advisory and restructuring deals, including those with Germany-based air-taxi manufacturer Lilium; Spain-based Santander Consumer Finance; and Romania-based retailer La Cocos. As KPMG seeks to diversify its portfolio and revenue opportunities, recent investments across its portfolio related to legal services suggest that demand across regions is choppy and that KPMG will be reviewing its positioning, one member firm at a time.
 
For example, in Australia, KPMG restructured its stand-alone legal services practice, folding KPMG Law’s Tax Controversy & Disputes practice under KPMG’s tax business. At the same time, in the U.S. KPMG is looking to invest heavily in AI to bolster its legal services offerings, creating a conduit for consulting business. Meanwhile, KPMG partnered with ContractPodAI to bolster its legal AI and contract lifecycle management capabilities as the firm seeks to expand its legal managed services opportunities targeting clients in the U.S., U.K. and Germany. We believe KPMG’s push in the legal services space can also help the firm gain access to the talent needed to enhance its governance, risk and compliance (GRC) value proposition, especially as more general counsels are getting involved in GenAI solution development.
 
Outside legal services and M&A advisory, we expect KPMG’s efforts to bolster its management consulting revenues will come from its investments in technology-centric capabilities, with AI and GenAI among the predominant topics impacting the firm’s strategy consulting sales. We believe the KPMG Lighthouse team will continue to provide a critical link enabling the firm to elevate conversations beyond the typical art-of-the-possible discussions and tying them to business outcomes with tangible solutions. While embedding AI and data science is not unique to KPMG, the firm has an opportunity to elevate the value of such offerings as the single most important technology the firm stands behind, especially as many of its competitors stretch their portfolios and messaging across multiple domains. While we understand this can be a tricky message to execute against, demonstrating depth and specialization will likely trump generalization moving forward as GenAI levels the knowledge field, helping KPMG stand out.
 
Legal services would only be part of KPMG’s story going forward, as we also discussed in the Fall 2024 Management Consulting Benchmark Vendor Profile: KPMG.
 

GenAI can help KPMG enhance its industry consulting expertise, provided the firm leans on partners to do the tech part and focuses on its business pain points

Healthcare was KPMG’s fastest-growing industry vertical at 6.4% year-to-year in 1H24, according to TBR estimates. As an outlier for KPMG’s growth, the vertical benefited from industry clients seeking to digitize health systems and improve the patient experience. KPMG is not alone in capturing high-growth opportunities in the healthcare sector as rivals Deloitte and Accenture have also captured robust sales expansions in the industry with both competitors enhancing value propositions through acquisitions including Gryphonic Scientific (biosafety and biosecurity) and Cognosante (federal health).
 
To counter competitive threats, KPMG leaned on organic means, announcing the opening of a Global Center of Excellence for healthcare based in Bermuda. While the center will bring in professionals from the Caribbean, Bermuda, the Crown Dependencies, and Mediterranean islands, it will also have access to KPMG’s broader network of 5,000 professionals across the firm’s service lines within the healthcare vertical, including 200 clinicians.
 
Outside healthcare, KPMG continued to rely on its industry consulting know-how to enhance portfolio capabilities around partner-enabled industry accelerators such as with Workday for Retail and Hospitality; with Meta using Meta’s open-source large language model (LLM) Llama to build solutions for internal audit and commercial loan processing, paving the way for opportunities within the financial services vertical; and with Salesforce around the use of Customer 360 solutions for healthcare, among other verticals.
 
TBR views these as important steps that are enabling KPMG to better compete with Big Four rival Deloitte, which has set its Industry Advantage program to drive long-term managed services and feed the Operate part of Deloitte’s business. In a recent conversation with KPMG’s Managed Services leadership, TBR got a chance to hear how KPMG is able to use the KPMG Powered part of its four-part framework — Connected, Powered, Trusted and Elevate — to drive conversations around industry pain points in verticals such as insurance and financial services that have helped generate managed services engagements. Additionally, leaning on strategic growth and delivery partners has helped KPMG demonstrate depth rather deviate from its core capabilities.
 
We expect KPMG’s next growth frontier to come from the firm’s ability to codevelop industry-specific small language models as clients look to take advantage of the power of GenAI without compromising security and privacy by using LLMs based on public data.
 
Graph: 2H24 Est. KPMG Management Consulting Revenue and Growth

Infosys’ Future: Scaling GenAI and SLM Innovation to Drive Growth and Stakeholder Trust

Infosys’ proven engagement and delivery strategies continue to pay off, evidenced by accelerated sales during 4Q24 and an increase in FY25 revenue guidance for the third consecutive quarter. The company’s approach of underpromising and overdelivering, rooted in the company’s humble culture, allows it maintain trust with ecosystem stakeholders while it continues to expand and enhance its portfolio in emerging areas such as agentic AI and industry-aligned small language models (SLMs).
 
Infosys remains well positioned to surpass India-centric peer Cognizant for the No. 2 spot in revenue size, despite the inorganic boost of over $800 million that Cognizant will receive over the next year from its purchase of Belcan. Its’ relentless execution, backed by investments in talent development and partner-enabled solutions, will continue to be the company’s key to success as it gradually increases its share of value-based selling efforts, which are also bolstering its profitability, making otherwise impatient shareholders happy.

Scaling GenAI use cases through the development of prebuilt, industry-specific SLMs, and relying on highly skilled talent and resource management

As noted in TBR’s 4Q24 Infosys Earnings Response report, developing a client-ready AI-first portfolio is not a strategy unique to Infosys, but keeping pace with the rapidly evolving generative AI (GenAI) market highlights the company’s appetite for innovation and helps it strengthen stakeholder trust. Over the past 24 months, a large portion of vendor-client discussions focused on experimenting with developing and running large language models (LLMs), often fed with either public or nonessential data. Growing adoption of the technology has introduced the need for developing SLMs that are either function or industry specific.
 
While cloud-deployed models have far fewer resource constraints, there are still significant drawbacks with an LLM approach. Additionally, LLMs’ massive size leads to downsides in efficiency, cost and customizability, presenting serious hurdles over the long term, especially as contextualization improves. Moreover, when looking at specific use cases, SLMs built to perform particular tasks can outperform broader LLMs. These SLMs can be pretrained on smaller datasets, enabling developers to be more selective with training data and opt only for high-quality data sources pertinent to the desired use case.
 

Find out what’s in store for IT services, cloud, telecom, federal and more markets in 2025 in terms of generative AI (GenAI).

Download TBR’s 2025 GenAI Predictions special report today!


 

Ecosystem partners remain a critical component of Infosys’ GenAI strategy

Infosys and NVIDIA co-launched three NVIDIA-enabled GenAI solutions, which, according to Infosys’ press release, use “NVIDIA NIM inference microservices, NVIDIA NeMo Retriever embedding models, and NeMo Guardrails to customize and deploy generative AI telco domain-specific LLM models.” Infosys also launched NVIDIA-enabled SLMs for Infosys Topaz BankingSLM and Infosys Topaz ITOpsSLM, targeting clients through core industry and horizontal offerings and allowing them to use their own data on top of the prebuilt SLMs.
 
Further, Infosys launched the Finacle Data and AI Suite of solutions to support banking clients seeking to enhance IT systems and customer experience using AI. The solutions include Finacle Data Platform, Finacle AI Platform and Finacle Generative AI Offerings. We see these capabilities as a prerequisite to enhance the core Infosys Finacle platform and enable Infosys to remain a formidable competitor in the banking space.
 
Despite the modularity of these offerings, we do not expect the company to change its commercial model and continue to use the suite of offerings to drive services opportunities. Infosys’ SLM portfolio expansion strategy closely mimics the company’s build-out of industry cloud offerings that address client pain points with prebuilt models for specific functions. The difference is the added complexity around building and managing the prebuilt SLM models with their massive number of parameters.
 
Developing and supporting these prebuilt models will require the right-skilled bench and, more importantly, retention programs enabled by unique career paths for programmers who are involved in such tasks. Infosys’ Power Programmers group of engineers consists of highly skilled professionals who are responsible for developing products and ensuring that the intellectual property they create and use meets the cost-saving requirements Infosys pitches to clients. The Power Programmers group is much leaner than the traditional software developers pyramid and resembles the business models that many vendors, including Infosys, may aspire to implement in the future.

Enhancing its chip-to-cloud strategy via acquisitions can bolster cloud performance, but only if Infosys accounts for and aligns with OEM and cloud vendor priorities, including edge and 5G

With its cloud business reaching 30% of Infosys’ total sales and growing 25.1% year-to-year in 4Q24, Infosys continues to invest across its portfolio to expand its addressable market opportunities. For example, Infosys Engineering Services remains among the fastest-growing units within Infosys as the company strives to get closer to product development and minimize GenAI’s disruption of its content distribution and support position.
 
Since the 2020 purchase of Kaleidoscope, which provided a much-needed boost for Infosys to infuse new skills and the IP needed to appeal to the OT buyer, Infosys has enhanced its value proposition to also meet GenAI-infused demand. Infosys’ investments in recent acquisitions including in-tech and InSemi have expanded the company’s addressable market opportunities around product engineering and silicon design services, further strengthening its chip-to-cloud strategy.
 
We do not expect growth of Infosys’ cloud business, Infosys Cobalt, to slow down anytime soon, given the company’s market position for infrastructure migration and managed services as well as its well-run partner strategy with hyperscalers. Adding semiconductor design services bolsters that value proposition as buyers consider whether to use price-attractive CPUs or premium-priced GPU data centers. The latter currently dominates the marketplace, and we expect that trend will not change for at least the next 18 to 24 months. But having semiconductor engineers on its bench can help Infosys start supporting CPU-run models, appealing to more price-sensitive clients.
 
Additionally, expanding its product engineering services also enhances Infosys’ edge and 5G value proposition, which we believe are two of the next frontiers for AI-enabled growth.

 

Follow Infosys’ performance throughout 2025 with data and analysis in TBR Insight Center. Start your free trial today.

What Spectrum Will 6G Use?

The wireless technology ecosystem is rallying around FR3 bands for 6G

The wireless technology ecosystem has settled on the upper midbands, specifically the 7GHz-24GHz range (aka Frequency Range 3 [FR3]). Within FR3, 7GHz-15GHz is considered the golden range for 6G, as it has the best balance between coverage and capacity and 1600MHz of total bandwidth could be made available in the U.S.
 
However, one of the biggest issues with these “golden bands” is the need for communication service providers (CSPs) to coexist with incumbent users, such as government entities and satellite operators, which utilize some of these channels for various purposes and would need to either clear, refarm or share those channels with CSPs for use in cellular communications. The telecom industry already has some experience with shared spectrum through CBRS, which operates in the 3.5GHz band, so there is a pre-existing framework and mechanism in place (i.e., Spectrum Access System) from which to begin establishing a spectrum sharing system for these new bands.
 
Ultimately, TBR believes that 6G will end up leveraging a mix of spectrum tranches, with midband, upper midband and mmWave frequencies all in play. Carrier aggregation and other frequency-combining technologies, as well as advancements in beamforming and endpoint devices, make these spectrum bands perform better when working together. Additionally, FR3 spectrum is not good at penetrating walls. Given that around 80% of wireless traffic is generated indoors — a statistic that is unlikely to change materially in the 6G era — FR3 bands would need to be complemented with lower bands to penetrate walls and provide optimal coverage and capacity.
 

Learn the scope of government support for the telecom industry amid 6G market development.

Download TBR’s 2025 6G Predictions special report today!


 

Limited CSP investment and increased government role expected to shape the next cellular era

The telecom industry continues to struggle with realizing new revenue and deriving ROI from 5G, even after five years of market development. TBR continues to see no solution to this persistent challenge, and with no catalyst on the horizon to change the situation, CSPs’ appetite for and scope of investment in 6G will likely be limited.
 
TBR expects CSP capex investment for 6G will be subdued compared with previous cellular network generations, and deployment of the technology will be more tactical in nature, which is a marked deviation from the multihundred-billion-dollar investments in spectrum and infrastructure associated with the nationwide deployments during each of the prior cellular eras.
 
In a longer-term effort to address this situation, TBR expects the level of government involvement in the cellular networks domain (via stimulus, R&D support, purchases of 6G solutions and other market-influencing mechanisms) to significantly increase and broaden, as 6G has been short-listed as a technology of national strategic importance.
 

Click the image below to watch this recent TBR Insights Live session, 6G: How Government Intervention Will Shape the Next Generation of Telecom

 
With that said, 6G will ultimately happen, and commercial deployment of 6G-branded networks will likely begin in the late 2020s (following the ratification of 3rd Generation Partnership Project [3GPP] Release 21 standards, which is tentatively slated to be complete in 2028). However, it remains to be seen whether 6G will be a brand only or a legitimate set of truly differentiated features and capabilities that bring broad and significant value to CSPs and the global economy.
 
Regardless, the scope of CSPs’ challenges is growing, and governments will need to get involved in a much bigger way to ensure their countries continue to innovate and adopt technologies that are deemed strategically important.
 
 

Learn more

Download 2025 Predictions special report: 6G’s Fate Depends on the Level of Government Intervention

Watch on demand: 6G: How Government Intervention Will Shape the Next Generation of Telecom

 

AI Agents: What Are They, and How Will They Impact the AI PC Space in 2025?

What are AI agents?

Over the past several quarters, OEMs have focused on incorporating local AI-powered features into their new PC releases, with initial neural processing unit (NPU)-enabled use cases leveraging AI to further enhance collaboration experiences and extend battery life. However, AI agents take the NPU’s functionality a step further, combining the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) with other resources to partially or fully automate a wide range of tasks, including responding to emails, booking hotel stays, or opening and closing IT help desk tickets.
 

LLM-based AI systems have traditionally been programmatic in nature, making them well suited for accomplishing a relatively narrow range of tasks quickly but with a varying degree of accuracy depending on the user’s specific query and how closely it aligns with how the LLM was trained. However, as AI has matured, an increasing number of organizations have invested in the development of compound AI systems, making way for the rise of agentic AI. Compound AI systems, which include AI agents, combine AI models with additional resources such as adjacent AI models, external data sets, web searching capabilities and other APIs to address some of the limitations of programmatic AI systems. This allows AI agents to carry out more complex tasks with a higher degree of accuracy compared to traditional programmatic AI systems, like ChatGPT.
 

Find out what’s in store for AI PCs in 2025, including how built-in AI and neural processing units are shaping the next PC refresh cycle.

Download TBR’s 2025 AI PC Predictions special report today!


 

As a general rule, as AI systems become more compound, speed is sacrificed. However, the compound nature of AI agents is what allows them to act on behalf of the user — a key differentiator and the primary value proposition behind agentic AI. Without any human intervention, an AI agent can create several subtasks where it brings in and analyzes data from several sources before determining the next step in the process.
 

It is worth noting that while AI PC agents typically leverage the NPU, most AI PC agents do not operate completely locally, leveraging cloud computing resources.

Proprietary AI agents will become increasingly prevalent in the AI PC space over the next several quarters

Maximizing AI PC appeal through software integration

For OEMs to attract customers to their AI PC offerings, the devices must have software that leverages the power of the NPU in a way that improves performance, productivity and/or security.
 

One of the most important software solutions underpinning the AI PC space is Microsoft Copilot+, which offers a series of generative AI (GenAI) features and experiences for Windows 11 machines leveraging several of Microsoft’s small language models. However, not all Copilot+ functions are run natively on the device, with certain queries going to the cloud, which may lead to security and privacy concerns for some users.
 

To differentiate its AI PC portfolio and bring more AI tasks onto the device itself, Lenovo has developed an agent known as AI Now, which has capabilities such as document management, meeting summarization, device control and content generation. Leveraging a local large language model built with significant collaboration from Meta, AI Now offers enhanced data privacy and enables GenAI features without internet connectivity by allowing users to interact in real time with the device’s personal knowledge base, rather than relying on cloud computing.
 

With the release of its first set of Next-Gen AI PCs in May, HP Inc. announced a similar application to Lenovo’s AI Now, named HP AI Companion. Available for download on any HP AI PC with a 40-60 TOPS (trillion operations per second) NPU, the application leverages OpenAI’s GPT-4 model to bring AI tasks such as performance optimization, document summarization and content generation onto the device.
 

Click the image below to watch our latest devices TBR Insights Live session, AI PCs in 2025: Unlocking Mass Appeal and Overcoming Market Challenges

 

AI agents as differentiators in the AI PC market

We expect to see these offerings become increasingly central to the AI PC space over the next several months, with vendors tapping into buyers’ concerns about data privacy related to cloud computing in order to promote their own proprietary AI agents. Vendors will continue to position these agents as complements to Microsoft’s Copilot+, rather than replacements, as they will shy away both from attempting to compete with Copilot+ and other cloud-based offerings and from alienating Microsoft, a vital partner when it comes to AI.
 

Overall, these agents are currently being more heavily marketed toward commercial customers, as that subsegment of the market is generally more strategically valuable to OEMs because of commercial PCs’ higher average revenue per unit (ARPU) and attach rates for peripherals and services.
 

However, TBR expects these agents to gain traction in the consumer AI PC space as well, especially as they include features useful to all users, such as performance optimization and increased security, as well as those designed specifically for enhancing workplace productivity. Ultimately, TBR believes the extent to which vendors can educate users on when and how to use specific AI tools will determine the level of adoption of individual AI tools. The availability of multiple tools on the PC is likely to lead to confusion.
 

Similar to AI PC OEMs, smartphone vendors are becoming increasingly invested in baking AI into their devices to enhance the devices’ value and accelerate the refresh cycle. Many of these features revolve around photo and video editing software, such as Google’s Magic Editor and Photo Unblur, as well as notification and document summarization. Personal agents that allow the user to navigate their device through voice commands and natural-language text such as Apple’s Siri are also popular.
 

Smartphone vendors are also combining on-device and cloud-based AI processing when building out the functionality of these devices, with the recently released Apple Intelligence platform being the most prominent example. When possible, queries are processed on the device through the NPU built into Apple’s proprietary chips, while queries that are more complex are sent to the cloud through the company’s Private Cloud Compute system. TBR expects that this hybrid model will increase in popularity as devices vendors balance greater AI functionality with data privacy and security.

 

Learn more

Download 2025 Predictions special report: AI PCs: Progress, Potential and Hurdles in Redefining the Market in 2025

Watch On-demand TBR Insights Live session: AI PCs in 2025: Unlocking Mass Appeal and Overcoming Market Challenges

AI Buzz Sparks IT Infrastructure Shifts, but Privacy and Strategic Challenges Are Impacting Adoption

Utilizing AI Is the Top IT Organization Priority for the Next 2 Years

The industry enthusiasm surrounding AI has quickly led to shifts in organizations’ strategic priorities and expected investments such as demand for servers. Despite the hype, few organizations have operationalized GenAI to date. Instead, most are focused on overcoming initial barriers to adoption, including understanding the business implications of this new technology frontier.

 

The buzz around AI has permeated the minds of IT leaders at many organizations, with 44% of respondents* indicating that utilizing AI is a top priority for the next two years, outpacing all other priorities surveyed.

GenAI Has Generated Significant Interest Among IT Buyers of All Verticals and Company Sizes, But Few Have Implemented the Technology to Date

Generative AI (GenAI) is a hot topic, but only 22% of respondents* indicated their organization is using GenAI-based technology in day-to-day operations, suggesting that many organizations want to leverage GenAI to drive transformation but are unsure of where to begin. Most respondents are in a conceptual phase, with 57%* currently discussing GenAI use cases or testing GenAI technologies.

 

Not all organizations wish to build their own bespoke GenAI solutions, with 18% of respondents indicating they are waiting for turnkey solutions that can be applied to their business. Only 3% of respondents* are not considering GenAI at all.

 

There were no major differences in current levels of GenAI adoption relative to organization size.

 

Respondents from the industrials and technology verticals are slightly ahead of others in terms of using GenAI in day-to-day operations. Public sector lags considerably, with only 9% of respondents using GenAI today.

 

Healthcare respondents were most likely to be in the testing phase, at 47%.*
 

Watch On Demand: Next-generation AI PCs: What It May Mean for the Next Refresh Cycle

Most Respondents Expect to Use GenAI Solutions Tailored to Their Use Case, While a Smaller Subset Will Adopt Software With Embedded GenAI Features

Overall, 65% of respondents* using or considering GenAI will run GenAI on their own infrastructure, and 45%* will use public cloud, signaling that GenAI projects will take on a hybrid strategy. It is worth noting that the respondents answering this survey are decision makers for purchasing IT infrastructure, and therefore may be more biased toward using their organization’s private infrastructure for GenAI versus individuals who are focused on public cloud.

 

For some organizations, using GenAI will be based solely on enhancements to ISV applications and not their own custom build-outs. Of the respondents using or considering GenAI, 13%* expect to only use software and applications with GenAI features and do not plan to build GenAI use cases in public cloud or on their own infrastructure.

 

Enterprises appear to be most wary of using public cloud for GenAI technologies.

Vendors Engaging Customers on GenAI Will Need to Start the Journey by Establishing Trust in Handling Data and Navigating Legal and Ethical Concerns

The greatest barriers to organizations adopting GenAI are those at the heart of the GenAI debate: ensuring data privacy and assessing the legal and ethical risks of using GenAI technology. IT decision makers are expected to ensure their organizations are operating according to standards; however, they are inexperienced with the technologies to be adopted and vendors have limited use cases to showcase at this time to assuage these concerns.

 

More tactical challenges, such as long lead times to purchase AI-enabled servers or structuring data for machine learning, are farther down the list but may become greater barriers over time when organizations move from conceptualization to implementation of GenAI solutions.

 

Enterprises are by far the most concerned with ensuring data privacy, as 56% of enterprise respondents* consider it a top barrier compared to 31% of respondents overall.

 

Obtaining budget is of greater concern to small and midsize businesses than to enterprises.

Financial services respondents were most likely to be concerned with more tactical issues, such as addressing hardware shortages, structuring data and finding vendors to help deploy GenAI solutions.

 

Access all of TBR’s customer research data on GenAI adoption in IT infrastructure with a subscription to TBR Insight Center™. Start your free trial today!

 

*Survey data and analysis in this section are excerpts from TBR’s 2Q24 Infrastructure Strategy Customer Research. The survey was fielded in April and May of 2024 and focuses on the overall investment strategies of IT infrastructure purchasers. Survey respondents are IT decision makers based in the U.S. who are responsible for servers and storage purchase decisions at companies with 250 or more employees. Small business was defined as organizations with 250 to 999 employees, medium business as organizations with 1,000 to 4,999 employees, and enterprise as organizations with 5,000 or more employees.

GenAI, IT Modernization and Strategic M&A Drive Infrastructure as a Service and Platform as a Service Growth

Enterprise Migrations and Large-Scale M&A Are Influencing the IaaS and PaaS Market

Current State of the Infrastructure as a Service Market

Among benchmarked Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) vendors, average revenue growth increased 21% year-to-year in 2Q24, marking the fourth consecutive quarter of acceleration. There are two primary factors at play: enterprise IT modernization activity, which is much stronger now than it was this time last year, and generative AI (GenAI).

 

Top hyperscalers Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft are capturing legacy Oracle and SAP workloads as customers continue to migrate to the cloud to not only outsource their IT operations but also drive lasting business value. Though the geopolitical outlook is increasingly uncertain, we expect customers will continue to prioritize more traditional “lift and shift” migrations, and steps vendors are taking to deliver more integrated solutions could help. For instance, by the end of 2024, Oracle’s database services will officially be available on AWS, Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud Platform (GCP), which could be a big growth tailwind for these vendors. For context, converting Oracle’s remaining database support install base to the cloud represents a roughly $18 billion incremental revenue opportunity for these hyperscalers, including Oracle itself.

 

Regarding GenAI, investments in AI compute and new data centers are translating into top-line growth. Most vendors report they have multibillion-dollar AI and GenAI businesses, though this is minuscule compared to the tens of billions of dollars these vendors are investing. Vendor capex guidance for 2025 suggests that the level of investment will only increase, although we do expect this is when GenAI fatigue will hit and many customers may begin to re-evaluate their IT priorities.

Current State of the Platform as a Service Market

The Platform as a Service (PaaS) market is similarly growing behind GenAI adoption, as many customers, who still have a fear-of-missing-out mentality, are spinning up new workloads natively in the cloud with services like Amazon Bedrock, Microsoft Azure OpenAI and Google Vertex AI.

 

The PaaS market will similarly be impacted by GenAI disillusionment, but we believe this trend will also cause customers to focus more on the data layer, prompting them to take a second look at strategies around governance, data quality and integration for long-term AI success.

 

Another key trend driving PaaS market growth is M&A. IT leaders are acquiring to enter new markets and access IP they can ultimately sell as part of an entire end-to-end suite of offerings, as customers continue to crave more simplified, integrated solutions. By far the best example is Cisco’s acquisition of Splunk, which added $960 million to Cisco’s top line in 2Q24 and is quickly making Cisco a rising force in PaaS with its observability portfolio. IBM’s proposed acquisition of HashiCorp, which is expected to close by the end of this year, would be another transformative deal that would put IBM squarely into the Terraform space and deliver synergies with Red Hat that will be attractive to unsatisfied VMware customers.

Cloud Infrastructure and Platform Revenue Leaders

Steps Microsoft Is Taking to Elevate Its Data Portfolio as Part of the Broader AI Strategy Will Fuel Azure Growth and Marginalize AWS’ Segment Lead

Cloud Infrastructure & Platforms Revenue and Growth_TBR 2Q24 

Amazon Web Services: AWS continues to ride a wave of accelerating revenue growth and will cross the $100 billion threshold in annual sales by the end of 2024. Making it as easy as possible for customers to build GenAI applications in the cloud with Amazon Bedrock’s unified API, and adjacent developer tools like App Studio and SageMaker, is integral to AWS’ strategy and ability to drive IaaS growth. At this point, there are probably well over 10,000 customers using Amazon Bedrock for a range of generic use cases like text generation and virtual assistants.

 

Microsoft: Though AI infrastructure constraints caused Azure revenue to dip 2 percentage points to 29% in 2Q24, Azure is growing faster than AWS despite becoming larger and closing in on AWS’ revenue volume. Steps Microsoft is taking to advance its PaaS strategy through solutions like Fabric will continue to fuel Azure growth and help protect Microsoft’s lead in the AI space. For context, the number of Azure AI customers also using Microsoft’s data and analytics tools grew nearly 50% year-to-year in 2Q24, while Microsoft Fabric has now reached 14,000 paid customers.

 

Google Cloud: Recognizing that GenAI leadership stems from the infrastructure foundation, Google Cloud has been heavily building out its infrastructure portfolio by supporting not only NVIDIA’s Blackwell chips, which are expected to be available on GCP in early 2025, but also its own hardware. This includes Axion, Google Cloud’s first Arm-based processor that will support a range of GCP services, including data services key for GenAI like Dataproc and Dataflow. In 2Q24 Google Cloud also announced its sixth-generation TPU (tensor processing unit).

Harnessing AI and Automation in Business Process Outsourcing to Drive Growth Amid Shifting Buyer Priorities

Offering Business Process Improvement Underpinned by AI Technology Enables Vendors to Increase Their Value Propositions and Drive BPO Revenue Growth

Vendors’ business process outsourcing (BPO) businesses continue to benefit from the ongoing shift in buyer priorities from innovation and growth toward business resiliency and optimization. Buyers are investing in automating business processes to free up costs, providing pathways to growth for vendors with AI-powered and platform-based offerings.

 

With generative AI (GenAI) taking center stage in both Accenture’s and clients’ investments, Accenture has an opportunity to further improve the company’s profitability, provided it can position GenAI as a value enabler, rather than another technology that is in search of a problem. However, we expect Accenture, like many of its IT services peers, to continue racing to capture as much business as possible in the managed services space before GenAI picks up and threatens the core value proposition centered on human-backed service delivery.

Graph - 2Q24 BPO Revenue and Growth

Driving Transformation in Healthcare, HR and IT Services with Business Process Outsourcing

Expanding its industry portfolio offerings, such as within healthcare, will enable Cognizant to deliver on finance, HR and back-office functional needs, helping to offset recent declines within its outsourcing services. In June Cengage, an education technology company, renewed its engagement with Cognizant to continue receiving services for seven years. As part of the deal extension, Cognizant will also now support Cengage Unlimited, which provides a subscription platform for users to receive education courses. Cognizant will also provide cloud and security services in support of its finance and HR operations.

 

HCLTech deepens its knowledge base with close partnerships with Google Cloud, AWS and IBM that enable the company to build domain and functional expertise on HR, CRM and finance functions, underpinned by AI. Integrating its partners’ AI platforms and associated talent enabled HCLTech to deliver on clients’ IT and business services needs and generated revenue growth during 2Q24. HCLTech’s partnership with IBM around IBM watsonx brings in AI expertise to address clients’ HR and IT concerns. HCLTech won a deal in 2Q24 with an energy infrastructure company in the U.S. to provide IT and business services to improve the client’s user experience, enabling it to more quickly pursue market opportunities.

Emerging Consultancy Trends: Talent Management and Innovation in the Spotlight

Technology continues to threaten the nature of consulting engagements, requiring consultancies to showcase value and deliver on outcomes. Greater investment in talent frameworks, structure and skill will equip staff to lead client discussions and effectively leverage technology to assist workflows. Partnerships remain a core piece of the technology integration, bringing in new expertise and go-to-market opportunities that enable consultancies to meet a wider variety of client needs. Client retention remains a priority across consultancies but will require the firms to effectively deliver value through services.

Consultancies Will Experience a Shift in Traditional Consulting Services as Technology Is Further Embedded in the Market

Consultancies will manage talent more closely to reach higher quality standards

Consultancies refreshed their network of centers, including new operations with partners as well as those designed for internal use. As the consultancies look to bring both talent and clients in-office to work more collaboratively, improve communication and enhance the culture, the new centers serve as a path to facilitate interactions and engagement.

 

In a joint investment, Microsoft and KPMG opened an Operational Risk Skills Development Center in Quebec, followed by a national rollout of the training center supporting Canadian clients’ efforts to take advantage of generative AI (GenAI) responsibly. KPMG also recently announced the opening of a European Union (EU) AI Hub in Ireland. The AI hub is located inside one of the firm’s Innovation Hubs and is set to house 200 employees with skills in risk, regulatory services and cybersecurity. The AI hub will leverage KPMG’s Trusted AI framework and use technology from Microsoft and Cranium (an AI security startup that was spun out from KPMG Studio in 2023).

 

IBM Consulting has poured investment dollars into training and building a network of hybrid cloud and AI talent globally, including IBM’s launch of an AI Center of Excellence in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, in January 2023 in partnership with the Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence.
 

Watch On Demand: $130+ Billion Emerging India Opportunity – Who Wins and Why in India-centric vs. Global IT Services Firms

With a return to in-person discussions and conversations, PwC strengthened its center network to emphasize technology solutions. For example, PwC established a Cyber Managed Services Center in Cork, Ireland; added a GenAI business center to its Luxembourg experience center; and opened an AI excellence center in Saudia Arabia.

 

Accenture announced the openings of GenAI studios in Chicago, Houston, New York, San Francisco, Toronto and Washington, D.C. Accenture Federal Services opened a Cybersecurity Center of Excellence (CoE) in partnership with Google in Washington, D.C., highlighting Accenture’s balanced approach to pragmatism and innovation executed through a well-oiled command-and-control culture.

 

Capgemini announced it had signed a strategic agreement with Amazon Web Services (AWS) to accelerate the adoption of GenAI solutions across organizations. The agreement focuses on helping clients gain knowledge around and realize the value of GenAI in business processes. Together, the two companies will move clients from pilots to production by leveraging Capgemini’s network of AWS CoEs. The partners will fast-track the deployment of industry-specific solutions, assets and accelerators, and create functional use cases through Amazon Bedrock.

New leadership will facilitate the evolution of traditional consulting services

With the appointment in July of a new PwC global chairman, Mohamed Kande, who was formerly the company’s Global Advisory and U.S. Consulting Solutions leader, TBR expects sustained and possibly increased investment in advisory and consulting capabilities across the global network, even as the consulting market overall continues to stagnate. Combined with the announcement of new leadership teams in a number of major territories, including the U.S. and the U.K., a new PwC strategy — to update the firm’s 3-year-old The New Equation strategy — will likely re-emphasize the PwC brand and lean into the firm’s technology expertise.

 

Janet Truncale became EY global chair and CEO on July 1, and TBR expects her top priority will be strengthening the company’s talent base, in part by continuing the EY Badges program and leading with its “better working world” strategy.

 

In February McKinsey & Co. partners re-elected Bob Sternfels as the firm’s global managing partner after three voting rounds. Sternfels has provided some stability to McKinsey in the last few years and will likely continue prioritizing quality over quantity, slowing its hiring efforts and fine-tuning the firm’s existing expertise to meet new demands in a GenAI age.

 

Across all three firms, in TBR’s view, new leadership (or consistent leadership, in McKinsey’s case) has been welcomed at the senior level and seen as necessary in light of post-pandemic changes to the consulting and professional services market.

 

In APAC, management consultancies have seen some leadership changes as well. EY Australia recently announced four new appointments: the leads for consulting in Australia; supply chain for Oceania; Asia Pacific financial services; and private equity consulting. Notably, only two of the people appointed to those four positions have been with EY for more than a few years.

 

In May EY Australia announced Katherine Boiciuc as the firm’s new chief technology officer. Earlier in the year, Boston Consulting Group (BCG) in Australia and New Zealand announced a number of senior-level promotions, including Stephen Hosie (healthcare, private equity and public sector), Whitney Merchant (gas, including liquefied natural gas), Lachlan McDonald (mining, oil & gas, manufacturing, and construction), and James Argent (managing director and partner). BCG also appointed Kelly Newton to serve as comanaging partner in New Zealand. Rounding out the region, KPMG appointed David Rowlands as global head of AI, in addition to the promotion of Tim Robinson to lead the firm’s technology consulting practice in Australia.

Partnerships require additional differentiation to drive value for clients

Differentiation will be key for consultancies to prove value tied to partner technologies including AI, GenAI, digital and cloud. Leaning on centers and talent to communicate the value and possibility of their services will provide consultancies with a slight advantage, but the firms will also need to partner around core AI and GenAI capabilities in addition to offering implementation and management services.

 

Post-pandemic management consultancies, particularly the Big Four, have expanded the scope and composition of their partner ecosystem, focusing primarily on key technology vendors including Google Cloud, AWS, SAP and Microsoft, as well as niche providers. Consultancies have trained their own staff around partners’ capabilities, as well as accelerated the opening of dedicated centers to facilitate adoption and transformation rooted within different solutions.

 

  • KPMG US runs a global Oracle operating model backed by a Global Oracle Center of Excellence, and the firm recently launched a Global Oracle EMEA Hub to capitalize on growth in that market. KPMG Delivery Network hubs, located across LATAM, EMEA and APAC, are supported by over 8,500 Oracle consultants, including more than 700 Oracle Cloud Infrastructure-certified consultants. KPMG also opened a CoE with Google Cloud to combine Google Cloud’s AI technologies with KPMG’s industry and functional knowledge.
  • PwC also partnered with Google Cloud, but through a different avenue, focusing on tax compliance and analytics. The partnership also dovetails with PwC’s efforts to complement its existing strengths around tax, workforce transformation, customer experience and HR processes. In addition, PwC teamed with Microsoft to open an AI CoE in Saudi Arabia with the goal of developing AI skills and supporting recruitment. The center will host a recruiting program every two months, bringing in new talent to support portfolio expansion.

 

With partnerships among the consultancies and vendors pursuing similar goals and initiatives, differentiation from the consultancies will be key to their success in scaling new technology and remaining go-to partners for their clients. The CoEs and certified talent provide an avenue for consultancies to immerse clients within the culture and company values in addition to exposure to the services and solutions.

Federal IT Spending Will Remain Robust in FFY25 Amid AI Prioritization

Federal IT in 2025: Sustained growth amid modest budget increases and strategic modernization

Since coming into office, the Biden administration has fueled an unprecedented federal IT bull market. While the White House’s proposed federal civilian technology budget of $75.1 billion for federal fiscal year 2025 (FFY25) is the smallest increase in several years (up less than 1% compared to $74.5 billion in FFY24), it is still an increase of more than 14% from $65.8 billion in FFY23, and up 25% from $60.1 billion in FFY21, the last year of the prior administration.

 

FFY25 has started with a continuing resolution (CR), as have most of the last several fiscal year. The impact of the latest CR on the largest federal systems integrators may be limited to shorter-cycle programs in their order books, but some disruptions to larger, longer-term engagements are not out of the question.

 

Despite uncertainties as a new administration comes into power, overall federal IT spending priorities will remain intact. Digital modernization across civilian, defense and intelligence IT infrastructures must continue. Services provided by civilian agencies must be digitized to enhance citizen engagement and operational efficiency. And IT investment by defense and intelligence agencies must continue expanding in response to global geopolitical instability and the ever-rising challenges from U.S. nation-state rivals.

 

In the civil space, IT decision makers are coming under greater scrutiny to demonstrate how effectively they have invested IT budget windfalls from the last several fiscal cycles. This is partially reflected in overall IT spending growth that will slow in FFY25, at least based on the Biden administration’s initial FFY25 budget request.

 

For example, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ budget is expected to decline by $100 million (or 1%) in FFY25 compared to FFY24. IT budgets at some agencies, such as the Department of Education will be flat in FFY25 but will expand at a handful of agencies like the Department of Homeland Security in FFY25.

 

The Defense Appropriations Act for FFY25 provides $852.2 billion in total funding, a 3.3% increase compared to FFY24. The Biden administration ceased providing greater detail on Department of Defense (DOD) IT outlays early in its term, but TBR assumes defense IT spending will increase in concert with the growth in overall defense outlays and will continue centering on using data to enhance warfighting and intelligence operations, modernizing the Pentagon’s underlying IT infrastructure, and achieving interoperability across service branches and with the defense agencies of U.S. allies.

 

Defense agencies will also ramp up investment on solutions that push data capture and analysis ever further out to the tactical edge. National security will continue to be a bipartisan matter as the global threat environment remains elevated. The total addressable market for federal systems integrators (FSIs) with a presence in the defense and intelligence sectors could be worth at least $200 billion, and potentially $300 billion or more, with a large and growing portion of the market opportunity tied to AI.

 

Technologies like quantum computing and space-based IT architectures have also been deemed critical by the U.S. defense and intelligence communities, and investment is accelerating in these areas. Additionally, AI currently retains a high strategic priority among emerging digital technologies.

 

AI investments across all federal sectors have accelerated as agencies recognize AI’s potential to optimize agency operations and enhance mission-critical agency functions. AI solutions enable DOD and intelligence community (IC) agencies to process high volumes of data, and subsequently generate actionable insights to warfighters and combat commands, as well as to intelligence operators in the field.

 

Federal agencies must also master AI from both a technological and a responsible use standpoint, prior to the inevitable adoption of generative AI (GenAI). The most basic, fundamental distinction between AI and GenAI is that AI is good at analyzing existing content while GenAI generates new content. Much foundational modernization work is still needed across the federal IT environment to accommodate digital technologies like cloud, AI and GenAI, ensuring continued (albeit slower) federal IT growth in FFY25 and beyond.

State of the Federal IT Market: Continue Opportunities Amid Slowing Growth — Watch On Demand Now!

GenAI will continue to revolutionize mission-critical functions and day-to-day operators at federal civilian, defense and intelligence agencies

The business case for GenAI streamlining human-resource-intensive, mission-essential operational tasks is indisputable. Even early GenAI use cases have demonstrated the potential of GenAI for federal agencies. Early AI pilots focused on automating repetitive duties to maximize efficiencies in federal agency workflows, but the scope is expanding to focus on the potential for AI to transform more mission-critical activities.

 

In addition to streamlining operations vis-à-vis AI, DOD and IC agencies are also implementing AI technologies to make sense of the enormous volume of data being generated by networks of satellite and C5ISR (Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Cyber, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance) systems and provide actionable intelligence to warfighters, military commands and other national security personnel deployed globally.

 

As a result, TBR expects that AI prototyping initiatives will accelerate in FFY25 and that more pilot projects than ever will convert to formal AI implementation initiatives in FFY25.

FSI-operated, AI-focused CoEs and innovation centers will proliferate across federal IT in FFY25

Federal agencies want to see AI in action, but FSIs must clearly demonstrate the potential ROI of AI to risk-averse agency IT decision makers. The FSIs most proactively managing their alliance ecosystems will take their relationships with commercially focused technology peers to the next level.

 

Like its parent company in commercial markets, Accenture Federal Services (AFS) has actively stood up new showcasing centers in federal IT. AFS’ collaboration with Google Public Sector has been particularly prolific as of late. In 4Q24, AFS and Google Public Sector’s Rapid Innovation Team (RIT) launched the Federal AI Solution Factory to accelerate the development and deployment of AI-powered solutions for federal agencies.

 

The new facility comes on the heels of AFS and Google Public Sector launching a new center of excellence (CoE) in 2Q24 to showcase how GenAI technologies can improve citizen services across federal agencies, following AFS and Google Public Sector teaming to stand up a new Cybersecurity CoE in 4Q23.

AI-related budget outlays in civil agencies will surge in 2025

AI is enhancing the citizen experience by automating human-resource-intensive tasks and enabling civilian agencies to respond proactively, not reactively, to security or operational challenges.

 

Civilian agencies are demanding AI technologies that maximize organizational efficiencies, knowledge management and security and that facilitate digital transformation of monolithic IT systems.

 

According to TBR’s 3Q24 CACI report, “The federal government allocated $3.3 billion for artificial intelligence (AI) in the FFY25 budget request, although TBR believes there is a large volume of undisclosed AI-related spending in the FFY25 budget earmarked for the classified arena in the DOD and IC, and federal law enforcement agencies. Beyond the $3.3 billion allocated for AI in the FFY25 budget, Congress is currently considering a proposal to spend over $30 billion on ‘AI innovation projects’ across civilian agencies, the first such effort fund large-scale AI adoption in the civil space. The bipartisan nature of the proposal certainly reflects how AI is increasingly being prioritized across the federal IT market.”

 

Civilian agencies will increasingly leverage AI in FFY25 to improve citizen-facing services, achieve regulatory compliance more efficiently, optimize operational workflows, and enhance workforce recruiting and retraining.