3 Ways AI Is Transforming the Cloud Industry in 2024

Hyperscalers and SaaS providers are clearly on the front lines of GenAI monetization, but the availability of GenAI services through cloud delivery methods will also accelerate the development of the market.

The Current State of AI Use in Cloud

GenAI adoption is reinforcing one of the strongest value propositions of cloud computing: access to technology. That’s right, even though cloud computing started with a focus on cost — both reducing and delaying costs through an operating expense model versus a capital expenditure model — more recently customers have come to appreciate the access to innovation via cloud models.
 
This cloud-delivered GenAI model is accelerating the pace of investment at scale in the market and will ultimately grow the market more quickly. Most customers are starting with a handful of use cases to gain experience and build the business case for additional GenAI investments. Software development, customer service, procurement, sales and marketing, and strategic ideation are common use cases for enterprises getting started with the technology.
 
Customers are still at a beginning stage of evaluating the costs, benefits and best practices for these early use cases, but we expect maturity to develop quickly throughout 2024. The experience gained throughout this year, including the security, quality and connection to measurable outcomes, will form a critical foundation for growth in adoption and in the market opportunity over the next five years.
 

Download Top Predictions for Cloud in 2024

Discover 3 key takeaways for the Cloud industry for 2024 according to TBR’s proprietary data and objective, independent analysis

How Will AI Impact the Cloud Market in 2024?

Torrents of Investment Will Continue

Cloud vendors must invest tens of billions of dollars in 2024 to realize the market opportunity in 2025 and beyond. Core infrastructure to support GenAI service growth is still in short supply, requiring significant data center build across the globe. As each vendor races to establish its AI infrastructure footprint, demand for high-performance silicon will outpace supply, compounding investment demands.
 
Meanwhile, the power held by large language model developers like OpenAI and Anthropic is drawing capital investments across the cloud landscape as vendors vie for their attention and collaboration. These investments will continue to grow and acquisitions are possible as cloud players look to establish a competitive advantage.

Trickles of Returns Will Grow

Premium cloud tiers, GenAI-add ons and pure play vendor revenue streams will grow but be outsized by the amount of investment required to support long-term growth. GenAI is still in its infancy, and a greater proportion of the necessary R&D investment lies ahead for cloud vendors. Customers will need to see tangible value delivered by their GenAI investments, which may not be feasible yet for many future use cases. Over the coming years, the focus will be on contextualizing GenAI around specific use cases to automate workflows and ensure positive ROI is delivered to customers. This will broaden the market opportunity and create a growth driver for players that are able to execute.

Ecosystem Development Continues at a Furious Pace

As is the case with all cloud technologies, the partner ecosystem will be a critical component of vendors’ GenAI strategies. From a technology perspective, relationships between delivery-focused hyperscalers and the model innovators like OpenAI and Anthropic were the initial priority, which is best illustrated by the strategic alliance forged between Microsoft and OpenAI.
 
These partnerships are bringing GenAI to the enterprise and allowing customers to begin experimenting with custom model development. This is where IT services providers will find their opportunities. Global systems integrators and management consultancies have the skills, certifications and competencies needed for GenAI adoption growth, and efforts to support the ecosystem development will occur as a result.

Conclusion

The current state of AI use in cloud computing underscores the shift from a focus solely on cost reduction to embracing innovation accessibility. Cloud providers are investing heavily in GenAI infrastructure, enabling customers to start with free solutions and scale up as needed, particularly in areas like software development, customer service and strategic ideation.
 
While customers are still in the early stages of evaluating the costs and benefits, 2024 is expected to witness significant strides in maturity, including improved security, quality, and measurable outcomes. Looking ahead, investment will continue as cloud vendors race to establish their AI infrastructure footprint, with collaborations and acquisitions likely as players seek a competitive edge.
 
However, returns may grow slowly initially due to the substantial R&D investment required, necessitating a focus on demonstrating tangible value and contextualizing GenAI around specific use cases to ensure positive ROI for customers. Moreover, ecosystem development remains crucial, with partnerships between hyperscalers and AI innovators driving GenAI adoption in enterprises, presenting opportunities for IT service providers to support ecosystem growth.

The Main Reason There Will not be an AI-centric Contract Vehicle in the Federal IT Services Space

Federal IT Vendors Navigating AI Hype

Since OpenAI’s ChatGPT garnered mainstream attention and media coverage at the start of 2023, it feels like every federal IT services vendor has been spurred on to disclose what they are doing with AI out of fear of being left behind by their competitors.

 

While Booz Allen Hamilton (NYSE: BAH) and Leidos (NYSE: LDOS) were innovators that were actively investing in early state generative AI (GenAI) prior to the pandemic, plenty of other vendors in the federal IT space have become increasingly active in regard to discussing their AI-related activities and how the technology will factor into their respective go-to-market strategies.

 

For example, General Dynamics Information Technology (GDIT) (NYSE: GD) touts AI for IT operations and AI for mission applications as two of its core digital accelerators. ManTech recently unveiled its own Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence Solutions Practice, and Maximus (NYSE: MMS) has also been getting involved.

 

While Maximus had been signaling that it viewed AI as a strategic growth opportunity since earning its seat on the Department of Defense’s (DOD) Joint AI Center Data Readiness for AI Development program in 2022, the company’s AI-related announcements ramped up in 2023. Maximus brought on Kathleen Featheringham as its VP of AI Consulting Services for U.S. Federal Services in March after she played a prominent role in establishing Booz Allen Hamilton’s strategy to further penetrate the U.S. federal IT sector by utilizing AI. Additionally, Maximus became talkative about how it was experimenting with AI internally.

 

AI is an opportunity for Maximus to augment its customer service representatives, easing their workloads while enhancing the customer experience. The company wants to train its new hires in scenarios with AI to speed up their development process and ensure they are capable of assisting clients. Booz Allen Hamilton is doing something similar with its workforce through its new alliance with Workera. One of Maximus’ long-term goals, though, is to train AI on historical data to the point that it can analyze an agent’s ongoing conversation with a client and provide potential remedies.
 

The Likelihood of an AI-centric Contract in Federal IT

As vendors of all shapes and sizes continue accelerating their efforts to harness AI, many analysts and market watchers are asking: When will we see a government agency award a vendor a revolutionary AI-centric contract? According to TBR’s research, in all likelihood, we will not.

 

While GDIT’s “Seeds of Change” study published in 3Q23 showed that 28% of government agency respondents either had AI solutions in use or anticipated that they would be in use within the next year, it is not so simple to have a massive contract vehicle focused solely on AI. The main reason for this is that many government agencies still need to address their aging IT systems. Far too many federal IT infrastructures are still running on monolithic mainframe systems and have archaic software and out-of-date programming languages. As my colleague, John Caucis, frequently quips to clients: “They can’t put AI on COBOL.”

 

Federal IT spending has been accelerating at a rapid rate over the last few years to support agencies undertaking their digital modernization journeys. To capitalize on this surge in available funding, vendors have been leveraging their partner networks to show agencies how they can help clients complete a litany of tasks like setting up hybrid cloud environments, improving their cybersecurity and introducing data analysis tools.

 

Some vendors, like Peraton, have been positioning themselves as cloud services brokers as government agencies look to customize their own cloud platforms with third-party services. As one might expect, demand for these services will steadily expand as agencies increasingly look at incorporating AI-powered tools into their environments.

 

Before these agencies can begin utilizing these tools, though, they first need to gather their data and then understand it. This is where vendors like ManTech are stepping in. ManTech’s consultants are helping agencies identify where they are in their digital transformation journey. From there, ManTech works with the client on planning, designing and delivering solutions that allow these agencies to reap the benefits of the technology. As more agencies name their chief AI officers and outline their AI strategies, there will be plenty of opportunities for vendors to get involved.

How Federal IT Vendors Will Find Success in AI

Vendors will need to onboard AI experts while also upskilling employees and ensuring they can utilize the technology in a responsible manner. For example, SAIC (Nasdaq: SAIC) is showing a willingness to take a margin hit and deploy its free cash flow to internal programs to cross-train and upskill its entire workforce on AI during 2024.

 

As vendors seek to capitalize on the growing demand for AI services, their relationships with technology giants like Amazon Web Services (Nasdaq: AMZN), Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) and Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) will also become increasingly crucial. Successful vendors need to deepen their partnerships and demonstrate how their technologies can augment the hyperscaler platforms that agencies use. Having access to these giants lends vendors credibility while giving them access to the robust technologies and insight into how those technologies are being best used in the commercial space.

 

Additionally, vendors hoping to capitalize on AI solutions will need tangible use cases — for example, offering a customer-zero approach where vendors can show instances of how the technology has been applied internally. Rather than buying into the hype around AI, clients will want to see how the technology has been successfully and responsibly applied and know that they are not the testing ground.

 

For example, before making CGI PulseAI publicly available, the platform was developed for CGI’s (NYSE: GIB) own internal use. As stated in a March 2024 TBR special report, “[Global AI Enablement VP Diane] Gutiw described CGI’s take on this idea, noting that the company innovates, develops and tests GenAI-enabled solutions internally, like other vendors, but ensures clients understand that CGI views this investment as a way to save clients’ money: ‘We always talk about fail fast. We’re doing that on our dime because we would not fail fast on your dime.’”

Conclusion

AI obviously offers ways for various agencies to improve their productivity in the short term. It presents a chance for healthcare agencies to not only gather their data but also better understand it and meaningfully utilize it. However, this will require more than just an AI-centric contract vehicle.

 

For example, as discussed in a 2022 TBR special report, the DOD’s vision for Combined Joint All-Domain Command and Control (CJADC2) is to create “a cloudlike environment that enables the rapid receipt and transmission of intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) data to interconnected networks. By developing a unified network that enables sensors on Internet of Military Things (IoMT) devices to instantly pass on mission-critical information to leaders, more informed and coordinated decision making is possible across the U.S. military’s branches. Decision makers can act faster and establish more cohesive battlefield tactics, factoring in land, sea and air threats with additional support from each other’s assets due to this common operating picture (COP).”

 

AI would play a prominent role in enabling the DOD’s CJADC2 vision — from immediately relaying this COP to even tagging threats and suggesting the optimal weapon to be used given the situation. Yet to even get to that point, the U.S. military branches would need to invest in an antifragile cloud environment underpinned by 5G technology and have robust cybersecurity measures in place.

 

AI will eventually be a valuable tool for agencies, but it will not be delivered to them through a single AI-centric contract vehicle.

Top 3 Questions Device Manufacturers Ask When Searching for Partners

Within the technology ecosystem, device manufacturers play a specialized role. OEMs operate under different business model constraints, more like traditional industries and less like the software, cloud and “as a Service” economics prevalent across the technology space.

 

In this blog, we answers the questions device manufacturers are asking in their search for ecosystem partners. Additionally, we highlight the trends TBR believes will shape the devices market over the next few years.

Key Questions Device Manufacturers Ask

Within the business-to-business ecosystem of devices (PC, smart tablet, handheld), are there specific evolving partnership dynamics that are bringing disruption in an era of AI and generative AI (GenAI)?

Not yet, but only because the OEMs find themselves in a strangely fixed universe, in which only two companies make viable x86 chips. NVIDIA’s software and developer head start gives it a stranglehold on AI GPU, and only TSMC (and soon Intel) can manufacture high-end chips.

 

Additionally, while platform providers Microsoft, Google and Apple carry oversized influence on the chip market, Microsoft’s impartiality with OEMs limits its ability to create specific deals and further complicates the potential for evolving partnerships across the ecosystem.
 

Click the image below to watch: TBR Senior Analyst Ben Carbonneau discusses trend expectations for the Devices industry in 2024 and how TBR’s research will address market activity in the coming year

As a player within the ecosystem — think, Accenture from the IT services perspective, SAP as a software provider or Nokia as a connectivity company — what could they be doing now to be part of the change as device manufacturers prepare for GenAI evolution in PCs and smartphones?

Infosys’ investment in semiconductor design services, as well as similar moves by other IT services vendors, indicates an appreciation across the ecosystem that the hardware components around IT may become less commoditized, surprisingly, as demands for specific capabilities vary widely by industry and applications.

 

If IT services, software and connectivity vendors previously treated hardware indiscriminately, opportunities to partner more closely or develop expertise and capabilities around hardware — at least semiconductors — could bring meaningful differentiation. The OEMs have flexibility in devices’ physical design, so wherever potential implementations involve nonstandard devices, as in edge and embedded devices, there are useful alliances between customers, their partners and OEMs.

 

All PC OEMs have embedded systems practices, where PC and server platforms are manifested in medical devices and other nonstandard form factors. Lenovo is especially eager to build diverse devices.

 

Coming to this challenge from the OEM vendors’ perspective, even with help from the rest of the ecosystem, OEM vendors still face differentiating products that must be standardized. Can an alliance, including go-to-market motions, coinvestment in R&D and even coselling, help OEMs differentiate themselves among other ecosystem players?

While one could speculate about an Accenture-Microsoft-Dell alliance launching a natively GenAI-enhanced laptop aimed at enterprise buyers, this world first require OEMs provide standard platforms so that everything works on everything.

 

They can vary form factors. They can provide edge devices that are PCs from the software/internal hardware point of view. But any new applications must be capable of running on competitors’ devices, which limits the potential for unique or differentiating services.

 

If, and when, OEMs form alliances with ecosystem players, those players, such as the IT services vendors, will want their customers to be free to switch hardware vendors at the customers’ discretion, limiting the value of alliances.

Navigating the Future of Device Manufacturing Partnerships

The landscape for device manufacturers, particularly OEMs, is undergoing a complex evolution amid the backdrop of advancing technologies like AI and GenAI. As explored in this blog, the search for ecosystem partners and the quest for differentiation amid standardization pose significant challenges. Current market dynamics, characterized by limited chip options and the dominant influence of platform providers, require OEMs seek innovative strategies to remain competitive.

 

Collaboration within the ecosystem holds promise for differentiation and adaptation to the GenAI evolution. And navigating these partnerships requires OEMs balance standardization with innovation, ensuring compatibility across diverse devices while also pursuing unique offerings.

 

Ultimately, like most players not already blessed with a monopoly or wildly dominant market position, the future success of OEMs in the tech ecosystem will hinge on their ability to forge strategic alliances and leverage emerging opportunities amid a rapidly evolving landscape.

How AI is Revolutionizing Telecom: Top Transformations for 2024

AI and generative AI (GenAI) use in the telecom industry has the potential to produce profoundly significant business outcomes, especially related to cost efficiency. Technological readiness for and commercialization of AI and GenAI are in process, and much more innovation is in store.

The Current State of AI Use in Telecom

The use of “traditional AI” (e.g., employing robotic process automation using structured data) is not new in the telecom industry. Telcos and vendors have been utilizing this type of AI for over a decade in various ways, including for cyber threat and anomaly detection as well as alarm and ticketing management.

 

What is new in the telecom industry from an AI perspective is the incorporation of GenAI (e.g., leveraging unstructured data, such as in large language models) into business and network processes. There are hundreds of viable use cases for GenAI, spanning all aspects of a communication service provider (CSP), that are being contemplated by the telecom industry, and this is where much of the focus was in 2023 and has been thus far in 2024.

 

Of the major domains of a CSP, TBR believes use cases related to contact centers and customer lifecycle management present the biggest opportunity to move the cost-savings needle. OSS and BSS, which underpin customer lifecycle management, will be key domains through which AI and GenAI evangelization will take place within CSPs. Network-oriented use cases for AI and GenAI are also numerous but will take a bit longer to materialize compared to contact center and customer lifecycle management use cases.
 

Download Top Predictions for Telecom in 2024

Discover 3 key takeaways for the Telecom industry for 2024 according to TBR’s proprietary data and objective, independent analysis

AI Transformations in Telecom: Key Changes for 2024

Contact Center

AI, particularly GenAI, will be leveraged to dramatically increase the intelligence of chatbots, enabling customers to obtain better and faster outcomes from their interactions with contact centers.

 

Labor will ultimately be significantly impacted by AI and GenAI, especially from a contact center perspective, but TBR expects gradual attrition, with vacated positions not being filled, rather than abrupt, large-scale layoffs at CSPs. Importantly, the AI and GenAI outputs for initial, commercialized use cases essentially all require vetting by human resources, at least at this stage of market development.

Customer lifecycle management

AI and GenAI will be leveraged to better understand customer behavior patterns and dynamically interface with customers via text or voice to optimize purchase decisions. For example, customers that typically roam in certain international countries may be proactively sent a special offer to purchase that better meets their needs, and if they have any questions before making a purchase, they can interface with a digital representative from the CSP that has the authority to answer questions and autonomously carry out tasks in the network.

Corporate Functions

AI will help automate and streamline financial reporting, legal and human resources tasks, and marketing functions, among other operational business responsibilities. GenAI will help companies automate more knowledge-based tasks, whereas before AI was only able to handle more basic, repetitive tasks.

Conclusion

The telecom industry has long utilized traditional AI like robotic process automation for tasks such as cyber threat detection and ticket management. However, the incorporation of GenAI, leveraging unstructured data, is a newer development, with numerous potential use cases within CSPs, particularly in areas like contact centers and customer lifecycle management.

 

In 2024 AI is expected to significantly enhance contact center interactions through smarter chatbots, while also impacting labor gradually rather than through mass layoffs. Customer lifecycle management will benefit from AI’s ability to understand behavior patterns and optimize interactions, such as offering personalized deals. Additionally, AI will streamline various corporate functions, with GenAI automating more knowledge-based tasks previously beyond AI’s capabilities.

When Will GenAI Impact the Devices Market?

GenAI Will Propel Growth in Devices and Associated Businesses

Generative AI (GenAI) will make devices, especially PCs and smartphones, more powerful and easier to use, and that will drive business among device, platform, silicon and software vendors but will not change the structure of the ecosystem. New opportunities in software and services will present themselves, new companies will enter the market, and most new companies will ultimately be acquired.

 

GenAI has not yet greatly affected the devices market and is not expected to begin to change device usage and requirements until CY2025, with the real impact beginning in CY2026. Right now, devices essentially serve as thin clients for cloud-based GenAI applications. Some PCs run machine learning applications that are helpful but inessential. Both iOS and Android smartphones use neural processing units (NPUs) for computational photography, but so far there are no significant large language model (LLM) applications running on devices.

 

Vendors and enterprises will spend the next two years evolving LLMs to run efficiently on local devices, expanding the devices to run LLMs, and developing the software to help users be more effective and insightful while making their jobs and lives easier.

Local GenAI Presents the Greatest Opportunity

Devices’ user interfaces (UIs) are the gateways the gateway to all computing; when you improve a device and the device’s software, you improve efficiency and the user experience across the board and you have the greatest possible impact on productivity, leading to optimal business results.

 

The user interface is not an afterthought or a sidelight; it governs what the user can do with the device and the underlying network. The UI both limits and empowers the user; a UI with GenAI greatly expands what the user can do.

 

Users spend many hours finding, arranging, organizing, sorting and transforming documents, messages, images, appointments and commitments. GenAI will help enormously in setting up and performing analyses, charting results, and laying out documents and presentations. With GenAI, it will be easier to automate the many tasks that are repeated with minor variations, with obvious benefits.

 

Device-based GenAI helps users do everything better and more easily; cloud-based GenAI makes individual applications more powerful and easier to use. Local GenAI will have a greater impact, contributing revenue and profit to winning software development companies, to the platform vendors and to the device vendors.

TBR Senior Analyst Ben Carbonneau Discusses Key Predictions for the Devices Market in 2024

The Steps to Local GenAI

It will be challenging to redesign GenAI software, along with PCs and smartphones, to make it possible to run effective and powerful local GenAI applications, but it is necessary because the devices must remain as responsive as they currently are. Users engage with the UI constantly, and delays would completely negate the benefits of an enhanced UI. The round trip to the cloud is unacceptable. Privacy concerns will also require local storage for private business and personal data.

 

Large language models are, of course, large. While PC memory and fast storage requirements will probably increase, a new architecture of multiple models will be required and is widely under development. The local model “knows” about the user’s data and activities, but it may consult with a company model for broader information and finally with cloud-based models for “knowledge” about the world.

We Still Need Software Development

Vendors will develop and adapt software to leverage GenAI. The conversational chat interface will be available to specify complex tasks, but PC and smartphone applications must have the faster and more conventional UI tools. Underlying the buttons and sliders will be more capable commands, adapted to the user’s needs and preferences.

 

The platform vendors — Apple, Google and Microsoft — have the advantage here, especially Microsoft, which owns its platform and its primarily horizontal applications. The platform vendors will provide APIs to GenAI resources and services to allow third-party software vendors to take advantage of their platforms. Third-party software vendors include established leaders like Adobe, but there are opportunities for new applications and vendors. Some SaaS vendors will build clients to take advantage of the local AI platform.

 

One new opportunity for both platform and software vendors is personal GenAI, which consists of private applications for individuals that assist in every aspect of their lives including work, home, family and health. The personal GenAI assistant is a smartphone automated personal assistant. It can shop, make appointments and even answer emails. Apple and Google have the inside track on this important business, and they will use their current voice interfaces, Siri and Google Assistant, respectively, as a starting point. Apple’s high-touch relationships with its customers and corporate emphasis on privacy will help the company’s effort.

 

The device vendors will benefit from the need for more capable hardware, and the new hardware should evolve more quickly than before, driving faster refreshes. They have few new software and service opportunities, however, as they need to provide standard platforms.

The Devices and Platforms Business Will be Bigger but not Different

The GenAI revolution will not greatly change the relationships that govern the production of devices. There is intense competition among the silicon vendors, but they face the usual array of customers. OEM vendors still face the challenge of differentiating products that must be standardized. Of the three platform vendors, only Microsoft plays well with others, and this situation is unchanged.

 

With respect to devices, the opportunities are larger but not very different. The invention of applications, leveraging the uniquely novel devices and platforms, is the only new type of opportunity.

Cloud Components Market 2024: AI, Hybrid Solutions and Key Acquisitions

The cloud components market is undergoing transformations driven by acquisitions, the rise of AI and the growing demand for AI-optimized infrastructure. Acquisitions by both software- and hardware-centric vendors are shaping the market landscape, with Dell Technologies, Cisco and Hewlett Packard Enterprise making strategic moves to strengthen their positions. Download your free copy of TBR’s Cloud Components Spotlight Report to read more vendor analysis from our recently published research.

 

Average cloud components revenue among vendors covered in TBR’s Cloud Components Benchmark was flat year-to-year in 3Q23. Market leaders continued to grapple with sluggish demand in certain hardware markets, namely storage, but reported strong interest in AI servers, which will flow through vendor financials in 2024. On the software side, acquisitions, including Cisco’s pending purchase of Splunk, will shape the market. Cisco will rise on the cloud software components leaderboards once the deal closes.

How AI, Hybrid Solutions and Acquisitions Are Shaping the 2024 Cloud Components Market

Acquisitions by Software- and Hardware-centric Vendors Are Shaping the Cloud Components Market

Acquisition activity among TBR-benchmarked leaders accelerated in 2023, and recently closed deals will drive vendor growth through 2024. As evidenced by Dell Technologies’ acquisition of Moogsoft, hardware-centric vendors continue to buy niche software IP that can be bundled with their trusted infrastructure and sold “as a Service.”

 

Meanwhile, software vendors are acquiring to push into high-growth markets, such as observability and security, while shifting their revenue mixes in favor of subscriptions. For example, Broadcom suspended all VMware perpetual license sales in December, while Cisco’s pending acquisition of Splunk is expected to add $4 billion in annualized recurring revenue. Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s (HPE) proposed acquisition of Juniper Networks will also shape the cloud components market, helping HPE extend its lead in networking “as a Service.”

Cloud Repatriation Activity Could Pick Up Amid AI Boom

According to TBR’s 2H23 Cloud Infrastructure & Platforms Customer Research, many customers that have migrated to the cloud are surprised by the cost of their monthly cloud bills. While we do not believe this dynamic is driving customers to move their workloads back to the traditional data center — at least not in significant numbers — the rise of AI could accelerate the shift away from the cloud.

 

Due to the vast complexity of AI solutions, particularly generative AI (GenAI) due to the tech’s use of large language models, customers prefer the simplicity and breadth of tools the cloud providers offer, but some customers may not view the public cloud as a sustainable deployment method for their AI workloads from a cost and performance perspective. We suspect this trend will draw awareness to hybrid cloud alternatives and lead customers to explore AI-rich on-premises solutions.

Demand for AI-optimized Infrastructure Is Poised to Drive Vendor Performance in 2024

Demand for cloud server and storage infrastructure has trended downward in parallel with the enterprise market, primarily due to customers’ ongoing digestion of inventory. However, the rise of GenAI is shifting paradigms in the cloud hardware market as adoption of accelerated computing continues to rapidly gain momentum.

 

As evidenced by 15% aggregate year-to-year growth in network components revenue for 3Q23, performance in this segment is improving, and TBR predicts cloud server and storage demand will rebound later in 2024.

Conclusion

The cloud components market is undergoing transformations driven by acquisitions, the rise of AI and the growing demand for AI-optimized infrastructure. Acquisitions by both software- and hardware-centric vendors are shaping the market landscape, with Dell Technologies, Cisco and HPE making strategic moves to strengthen their positions.

 

The cloud repatriation trend, while not yet significant, could gain momentum, especially with the increasing complexity and cost of AI workloads. This could lead to renewed interest in hybrid cloud solutions and on-premises AI-rich infrastructure. Despite a recent decline in demand for cloud server and storage infrastructure, the rise of GenAI and accelerated computing is expected to drive a rebound in demand later in 2024.

 

 

Stay ahead of the curve with our latest insights and updates. Subscribe to Insights Flight now to receive exclusive content, expert tips, Q&A invitations and industry analysis straight to your inbox. Don’t miss out on the opportunity to elevate your knowledge and stay informed!

Fast Growth or Fading Fast: GenAI Opportunities for Legacy Global Systems Integrators

How Can Global Systems Integrators Take Advantage of GenAI Hype?

Not all global systems integrators (GSIs) are the same and not all benefited from the 2023 hype cycle around generative AI (GenAI). 2024 could be a regrouping year for some GSIs — a chance to close the gap on market leaders and re-establish their positions in the broader IT ecosystem. For others, though, new headwinds combined with old weaknesses will stymie growth and limit strategic choices.

 

In the below TBR Insights Live discussion, Principal Analyst Patrick M. Heffernan and Senior Analyst Kevin Collupy discuss the 2023 and early 2024 performances of some of the market’s more hardware-centric, legacy GSIs and what you can expect from these vendors in the coming years.

Click the image below to watch the full session on GenAI opportunities for legacy GSIs, including the pair’s expectations for:

  • How leading GSIs have positioned themselves for growth in an uncertain market
  • What obstacles and chaos GSIs can expect throughout 2024
  • How GenAI will disrupt the market, providing opportunities for ecosystem-enabled growth and exposing GSIs that are not prepared or well positioned for growth

Presentation decks for all TBR Insights Live sessions are available to Insights Flight subscribers. Click here to send the above presentation straight to your inbox.

Exploring AI and GenAI in Telecom: Opportunities and Challenges for CSPs

There are myriad use cases for AI and generative AI (GenAI) spanning all aspects of a communication service provider (CSP). TBR’s research indicates use cases related to call centers and customer lifecycle management (e.g., OSS/BSS) present the biggest opportunities to move the needle in cost savings for CSPs. The bigger issues surrounding AI and GenAI pertain to governance, privacy and societal considerations, any of which could stifle market development.

 

In this TBR Insights Live session, Principal Analyst Chris Antlitz gives an exclusive review of TBR’s inaugural Telecom AI Market Landscape, which looks at how CSPs and vendors that supply CSPs are adopting AI in their internal operations and in their products and services. Don’t miss this opportunity to learn the ways in which AI and GenAI are expected to transform the telecom industry!

Click the Image Below to Watch the Full Replay Now

Watch TBR Insights Live - The Potential of AI and GenAI in Telecom: Key Opportunities and Challenges for CSPs

In This FREE TBR Insights Live Session on AI and GenAI Opportunities and Challenges for CSPs You’ll Learn:

  • Key use cases for AI and GenAI for CSPs
  • The vendors being proactive with AI and GenAI
  • The kind of business outcomes the telecom industry can expect from AI and GenAI

TBR webinars are held typically on Thursdays at 1 p.m. ET and include a 15-minute Q&A session following the main presentation. Previous webinars can be viewed anytime on TBR’s Webinar Portal.

For additional information or to arrange a briefing with our analysts, please contact TBR at [email protected].

Unlocking Business Success: Competitive Intelligence

What is competitive intelligence, and why is it important. In this blog, we highlight three reasons why CI is crucial to business success and how best to leverage CI I your strategy.

Understanding Competitive Intelligence for Business Success

Competitive intelligence is a broad concept: Think of it as any intelligence that improves your business’s performance in the market. Insight on what, how and where competitors are operating is one aspect of competitive intelligence, but it is also important to include the role of partners and the perspective of end customers to establish an all-encompassing view of the overall market.

 

Most markets are imperfect, with complexity across regions and verticals as well as the need for a myriad of vendors to work together to create solutions. Due to that market complexity, information on what is occurring in the space and why can be difficult to ascertain. Competitive intelligence is one method to extract points of clarity that can serve as guideposts as you set objectives for your business.
 

Click the image below to hear more about competitive intelligence for business success from TBR Principal Analyst Allan Krans

Why Is Competitive Intelligence Important?

Competitive intelligence can be the best proxy for your own business decisions. Gaining a deeper understanding of individual vendors and the broader set of competitors in the market landscape can inform your decision making in a powerful way.

 

  1. Competitors as a proxy

Anticipating where the market opportunity is moving and how to capitalize on that is a challenging proposition, especially in dynamic, quickly evolving markets like IT. It is difficult to make complicated and/or significant investments, and the risks are always high. In quickly evolving markets, one of the best ways to reduce risk and increase the confidence of the overall organization in making business decisions is to look at how your competitors are handling the same situations. Understanding how and in which markets your peers and competitors are investing can provide a number of benefits.

First, this information validates strategic directions your own business is considering. It may not guarantee the success of an investment but at least it can provide reassurance that competitors are weighing the risk-reward ratio in a similar manner. Second, understanding the intent and strategy behind different decisions can be even more important for competitive intelligence. No two businesses are the same, so this context can allow your business to translate the intent of different competitor strategies into something that works for your business. The third benefit is gaining information about the outcomes of competitor strategies in real financial terms — one of TBR’s specialties. Revenue, expenses and profit margins are concrete metrics that can help you gauge the effectiveness of competitor strategies and understand whether the outcomes align with your business’s overall financial goals.
 

  1. Markets inform opportunity

Looking holistically at markets and how different peers and competitors operate within them can provide value competitive intelligence. This broad view can help you gain insights into where and how a group of key competitors operate within a market and with what results. TBR’s benchmark and market forecast reports are examples of this type of competitive analysis, illustrating the size, growth and strategies of a given group of peers within a market segment.
 

  1. Competitive intelligence can guide business strategies

A combination of competitive intelligence activities, including deep dives into segment leader strategies, broad coverage of other peers in the space and an analysis of the different objectives for those peers, can be used as a powerful tool for business strategy road mapping. These combined activities can illustrate the objectives, investments, outcomes and landscape against which your business will be competing across different endeavors. Just because your peers are going in a certain direction does not mean that is the best path for your business. Likewise, just because competitors are not making certain decisions does not mean your business should not consider them. However, an awareness of what is occurring can be an important source of intelligence.

Conclusion

There is no perfect customer, no perfectly aligned competitor, and no clear market opportunity, especially in IT. In a world where no perfect decision exists, competitive intelligence can be an informative window into how businesses in similar markets are operating their businesses.

 

Having market perspectives to consider, strategies to evaluate, and approaches to both emulate and avoid can be valuable. Competitive intelligence can provide these benefits and more, helping organizations plan future investments and reduce overall risk.

 

 

Stay ahead of the curve with our latest insights and updates. Subscribe to Insights Flight now to receive exclusive content, expert tips, Q&A invitations and industry analysis straight to your inbox. Don’t miss out on the opportunity to elevate your knowledge and stay informed! 

CGI Leverages AI Expertise for GenAI Success

In early March, TBR met with CGI’s Diane Gutiw and Frederic Miskawi, both VPs of Global AI Enablement, for a discussion about CGI’s evolving generative AI (GenAI) capabilities and offerings, as well as the executives’ views of the changing market around digital transformation, IT services and consulting, and AI overall. The following reflects both that discussion and TBR’s ongoing research into CGI and peers across the IT services and broader technology ecosystem.

CGI’s Approach to Generative AI and Innovation

Leveraging AI Expertise for Business Transformation

In describing the current market for IT services and technology-enabled solutions, Gutiw and Miskawi noted that clients emerged from 2023’s GenAI hype cycle feeling overwhelmed by proofs of concept (PoCs). Many emerging technology-centric engagements stalled at the PoC and pilot stages, stymied by challenges around data, change management and uncertain (or slow) ROI.

 

As a result, enterprise IT leadership, already saddled with a vested interest in maintaining relationships with current vendors (think: Amazon Web Services [Nasdaq: AMZN], Microsoft [Nasdaq: MSFT] and others), relies on current vendors and partners for guidance, even in an emerging area like GenAI. This echoes TBR’s findings in our December 2023 AI & GenAI Market Landscape.

 

Gutiw and Miskawi pointed out that in the current market, CGI (NYSE: GIB) can lean on two long-standing strengths: its culture of innovation rooted in governance and methodology, and its expertise and experience with AI, which predates the emergence of GenAI and the subsequent hype cycle. Bringing specificity to assertions about innovation, Gutiw and Miskawi described CGI’s thinking around “digital triplets.”

 

As Gutiw explained, CGI is “taking our digital twins that already exist and extending it by adding the generative AI and explainable AI as the third sibling.” In TBR’s view, this approach to harnessing technology in which clients have already invested — and in which CGI has proven expertise — and multiplying the benefits by leveraging GenAI and explainable AI should be a successful strategy for CGI to expand its footprint at existing clients and solidify its reputation as an innovative leader in the AI market.

 

Reinforcing CGI’s strength around established AI capabilities and scale, Miskawi added that CGI is seeing a multi-model ecosystem where, depending on the nature of the industry that you’re in, the nature of even the group within the enterprise that you’re working with, you have different types of needs, different types of fine-tuning that CGI is doing, mixing specialized AI models, which are more the legacy AI models, with the generative AI models where we’re seeing LLMs [large language models] interacting with the data inside categorization models … that ecosystem is evolving in front of our eyes and accelerating.”

 

Gutiw and Miskawi explained that while CGI’s GenAI practice resides within the company’s Data practice, CGI is undertaking GenAI efforts globally. This is in contrast to the proximity model that differentiates CGI from other IT services vendors. Gutiw said CGI understood that GenAI could not be stuck in one silo or isolated by client and that the technology would bring the most value internally and to clients only through a global approach to accelerating processes and disseminating knowledge around AI.

 

Bolstering this approach, CGI is focused on more than simply GenAI and is innovating on and delivering Frontier AI, according to Gutiw and Miskawi. In TBR’s view, 2023’s relentless hype around GenAI probably makes IT services and technology buyers more likely to look beyond the exciting new trends and instead find credibility in an approach that leverages established AI expertise.
 

TBR principal analysts discuss how the GenAI disruption is similar to prior disruptions, as well as how it is different, and which technology vendors are best positioned to win and why. Watch now by clicking the image below.

CGI’s Strategic AI Investments and Global Success

The CGI GenAI leaders also touched on two aspects of the current IT services and technology ecosystem that TBR believes are critical to vendors’ success: customer zero and technology agnosticism. TBR’s research has shown that the most resonant GenAI use cases start with the vendor testing the solution itself, serving as customer zero for the services or products before bringing them to clients.

 

Gutiw described CGI’s take on this idea, noting that the company innovates, develops and tests GenAI-enabled solutions internally, like other vendors, but ensures clients understand that CGI views this investment as a way to save clients’ money: “We always talk about fail fast. We’re doing that on our dime because we would not fail fast on your dime.” Gutiw described a solution CGI developed for responding to RFPs, called BidGenAI, which pulls from the company’s own database of wins and losses, shortening the time needed to pull together a (hopefully winning) response.

 

While requiring customizations to fit a client’s specific data environment, industry needs and compliance requirements, the BidGenAI tool undoubtedly can be applied across a wide range of enterprises. While not the first or only IT services vendor using the customer-zero approach (think: Accenture [NYSE: ACN] and IBM [NYSE: IBM]), CGI was explicit about the financial benefits clients will realize when CGI foots the innovation — the fail fast — bill.

 

The second aspect, technology agnosticism, has long been a feature of the consulting and IT services market, in which vendors shy away from aligning too closely with any one technology supplier for fear of alienating clients looking for the best-fit solution, not just the tech solution that most benefits the IT services vendor’s or consultancy’s bottom line.

 

Post-pandemic, TBR has seen a pronounced shift among some leading IT services vendors and consultancies toward much closer and more publicly embraced partnerships. Exclusivity remains rare, but something akin to most favored nation status or first among equals has permeated the IT services ecosystem. In this evolving landscape, CGI’s AI leaders described the company’s approach as “technology flexible” and noted strategic partners in the AI space include IBM, Microsoft, Google (Nasdaq: GOOG), SAP (NYSE: SAP), Oracle (NYSE: ORCL) and Amazon Web Services, as well as a slew of smaller technology players.

 

In TBR’s view, CGI’s emphasis on flexibility addresses the need to work with a range of technology partners to meet clients where they are while assuring clients CGI has invested fully in the training and capacity-building necessary for a robust AI practice.

Embracing Transformation While Rooted in Solving Business Problems

Two aspects of CGI’s approach to GenAI struck TBR as significant in understanding the company’s likely path forward and potentially its position within the IT services and GenAI market.

 

First, Miskawi, speaking about GenAI as understood and deployed within CGI itself, said simply, “It is transformative.” One could understand that to be obvious after more than a year of relentless hype. Or one could hear echoes of the famous “Mad Men” line, “It is toasted,” and consider CGI is embracing how much change will be necessitated by adopting GenAI across its own enterprise. Every other IT services vendor could do the same, but it remains to be seen if they can do it with the same welcoming embrace as CGI.

 

Second, TBR noted that during the entire discussion, Gutiw and Miskawi remained focused on business outcomes — for CGI and for its clients — a mindset and approach frequently ascribed to but rarely done. At one point, Gutiw noted that “it’s really understanding how we can use [CGI’s own capabilities and partner technologies] safely and how we can help solve business problems leveraging the technology.”

 

CGI’s challenge, of course, is ensuring that leaders across the company understand how to stay focused on clients’ business problems and how to recognize when a business challenge could be addressed through a GenAI-enabled solution.

CGI and GenAI: Investments, Approaches and Designs

In addition to the wide-ranging discussion, CGI’s GenAI leaders shared specifics about the company’s GenAI practice, including:

 

  • Over 10,000 professionals globally engaged on Data Analytics and Data Engineering projects with clients
  • CGI’s AI Advisory Services include AI Enterprise Governance OCM, Data and AI journey design and implementation, AI Business Consulting services with AI strategy road maps, and Responsible Use of AI frameworks.
  • CGI’s enterprise AI investments have focused on operational excellence; training and teaming; foundational capabilities around data, platforms and processes; and solution/use-case development.
  • CGI has invested in a Responsible AI Framework and an AI Strategy Framework to guide itself and its clients through the complexities of AI governance and risk.

 

In TBR’s 1H24 CGI Federal Vendor Profile, we noted that “CGI Federal’s parent company announced in July 2023 it would invest $1 billion over the next three years to fuel AI-based growth. CGI’s forthcoming outlays will fund the expansion of its AI-based advisory capabilities — particularly around the company’s Responsible Use of AI framework, which would resonate well with federal agencies. CGI Federal is facing a shifting competitive landscape in federal digital consulting, as General Dynamics Information Technology (GDIT) (NYSE: GD) is standing up a new advisory practice that will push adoption of its AI-related digital accelerators and ManTech is leveraging its 3Q23 acquisition of Definitive Logic Corp. to launch an AI-focused Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence Solutions Practice.”

 

In addition, TBR notes that CGI Federal won a deal with the U.S. Department of State in October 2023 to provide on-site processing functions for consular services in Australia, Fiji, Japan, New Zealand and South Korea, leveraging the CGI Atlas360 solution’s AI capabilities to help enhance the visa application process.