Inflation, recession and uncertainty: 3 key drivers of cloud economics

Inflation, recession and uncertainty are driving cloud economics, but what does that mean for pricing, talent and vendor performance?

 

Cloud opportunity has grown despite, or possibly because of, recent global disruption related to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the current concoction of macroeconomic disruption — inflation, the war in Ukraine, the looming threat of a global recession — is testing this resilience and growth is starting to slow.

 

Join Practice Manager Allan Krans, Senior Analyst Evan Woollacott and Senior Analyst Catie Merrill Thursday, Sept. 22, 2022, for a closer look at how cloud vendors are reacting to the current environment, as well as the threats and challenges we believe they’ll face in the near future.

 

In this FREE webinar you’ll learn:

  • How the threat of a recession impacts cloud spending and leading vendor performance
  • How inflation will impact cloud pricing and profitability
  • How the war for talent impacts cloud vendors and their ecosystems of services and ISV partners

 

 

 

 

Previous TBR webinars can be viewed anytime on TBR’s Webinar Portal. For additional information or to arrange a briefing with our analysts, please contact TBR at [email protected].

TBR launches Decarbonization Market Landscape

In TBR’s Decarbonization Market Landscape learn what vendors have committed to do, how they are helping clients, and where opportunities exist for technology partners, competitors and disruptors in the decarbonization space.

Built for this moment: Optiv evolved to full-stack security services

Expanded security services well beyond value-added reseller

On July 28, TBR attended a presentation and Q&A session held by Optiv’s leadership team, including CEO Kevin Lynch and SVP for Cyber Defense & Applied Security Jason Lewkowicz, who discussed the company’s overall strategy, place in the market and core cybersecurity offerings. They were later joined by a broader Optiv team for a deeper dive into some specific security services offerings. The following reflects that session as well as TBR’s ongoing research into and analysis of the cybersecurity services practices of leading IT services vendors, cloud vendors and software vendors.

 

For TBR, CEO Lynch captured Optiv’s essence when answering a question about change management by emphasizing how much Optiv itself has evolved and will continue to do so. Lynch said the company’s services business has changed significantly in the last couple of years. Previously, Optiv provided mostly attached technical services, bringing in third parties in a standard VAR business model. With expanded capabilities, Optiv expanded its footprint at clients and has shifted its focus to business outcomes, reflecting an evolution in how chief information security officers (CISOs) see their value in an organization. Lynch described Optiv as “the last mile in a tech ecosystem” and said his company was built for this particular moment in cybersecurity services, as Optiv combined “great technical acumen in the field,” proximity to clients, and technology ecosystem partnering done in “a unique way.”

 

In TBR’s view, Optiv unquestionably benefits from deep expertise in deploying and integrating a wide range of technologies across the security space and executing a business model pivot from VAR to a full range of consulting, integration and managed services capabilities. Private equity ownership and the ability to attract top security talent undoubtedly have helped the company expand. Sustained growth in the near to medium term will likely depend, in TBR’s view, on Optiv’s ability to scale current capabilities without compromising quality, expand brand recognition within the ecosystem as more than just a VAR, and deepen the company’s footprint with clients without overextending outside its core security services offerings.

 


Free Webinar: 5G infrastructure spend has peaked – should you be concerned?



Close to clients, and delivering on technology and services

Optiv’s presentation included details about the company’s current business, which has over 2,300 professionals serving approximately 6,000 clients, predominately in North America. Lynch noted that the company’s revenues expanded at a double-digit growth rate from 2020 to 2021 based on two growth pillars: technology, which includes reselling technologies and solutions from 450 partners; and, services, which includes a 650-plus-person team of experts with deep technical talent working directly in the field on clients’ specific business and security challenges, supported by larger delivery and Security Operations Centers teams.

Lynch said clients vary widely by revenue size, and most of Optiv’s talent works in close proximity to clients’ sites, with the company operating just three main hubs in Kansas City, Kan.; Denver; and Bangalore, India. For context, TBR notes that Atos has a little less than three times as many security services professionals generating around $750 million annually, Accenture Security (NYSE: ACN) claims a headcount almost seven times Optiv’s with revenues close to $6 billion, and Deloitte has close to 10 times the headcount of Optiv and revenues near $4 billion. Those figures likely include professionals in roles not specific to security who provide industry knowledge, consulting or systems integration in coordination with more specialized security services engagements, but the overall scale of those three vendors challenges Optiv in terms of talent and client mindshare.

Meeting clients where they are with advice, implementation and managed services

Shifting to a discussion of how Optiv provides security services to clients, Lynch described three “modalities”: advise, deploy and operate. In the first, Optiv views its clients as deserving of “great advice on what to do in this unprecedented time,” leading the company to provide security strategies, insights, design and envisioning of desired future operational states. The second modality, deploy, constitutes the shift from “thoughts to actions,” as described by Lynch, and includes an evaluation of which technology assets should be deployed, validation of a client’s existing technology, sourcing by Optiv of fit-for-purpose technology, and integration into a client’s environment.

After this stage, according to Lynch, some clients ask Optiv to become a full-on security partner, taking over the operations of the client’s security apparatus through a managed services arrangement. Lynch said these clients typically recognize that Optiv’s security expertise cannot be replicated in-house, in part because these clients’ core business value does not come from security while Optiv’s does. He added that Optiv “will build the product stack to deliver on this promise” of providing “the entirety of [some clients’] security needs,” but cautioned that because Optiv has “to be perfect when we deliver,” the company continues to build out these capabilities to meet their ambitions.

 

Diving further into Optiv’s approach, SVP Lewkowicz noted Optiv has shifted its focus to making its services simple for clients to consume, in part by meeting a client “wherever they are on the security journey.” In describing some of Optiv’s security services, Lewkowicz said the company’s Strategy and Governance practice works with clients lacking core competence and expertise around security, helping those clients set desired outcomes; the Digital Transformation practice examines the full spectrum of enterprise technology for security implications, too often after a client has already started a digital transformation journey; and the Risk Management practice helps clients measure risk through the right security and compliance lenses.

In describing these offerings, which Optiv includes under an overall Cyber Strategy & Risk practice, complemented by a Cyber Protection & Identity practice and a Cyber Defense & Applied Security practice, Lewkowicz acknowledged the role of Optiv’s 450 technology partners and said the company is the “connective tissue” between technology and services.

 

TBR noted throughout Lewkowicz’s presentation an emphasis on highly flexible scoping arrangements, with Optiv content to meet a client’s every security need or just a small set. In TBR’s experience, most security services vendors take a more proscriptive — or at least an encouraging with some pressure — approach, potentially leading clients to take on more than they are prepared for. Both Lewkowicz and Lynch stressed that Optiv’s overall culture engendered a flexible and client-centric approach, potentially providing a strength against other security services vendors.

 

One additional note on Optiv’s approach: Lynch described his company’s decision to work with 450 technology partners as a strategic choice, saying they could work with 3,000 or more players across the security technology spectrum but had narrowed its ecosystem down to 450 to make Optiv a “value-added convener of IP.” He said that all 450 technology partners engage in go-to-market motions with Optiv and that the company wraps services around some of those technology partners’ solutions.

For a select group, perhaps as few as seven partners among the 450, Optiv cocreates and builds integrated solutions. This pyramid of partners strikes TBR as refreshingly honest — no company could adequately manage 450 relationships to a uniform degree of commitment and investment. Many larger, multifaceted IT services providers have established services-plus-technology partnerships, often described as business groups, to advance go-to-market strategies with specific technology vendors, such as Amazon Web Services (Nasdaq: AMZN), Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT), Google (Nasdaq: GOOGL) and SAP (NYSE: SAP). While a seemingly successful strategy for IT services vendors, TBR does not believe that kind of branded approach, an explicit tie to a massive technology provider, would benefit Optiv.

As CISOs face uncertainty, Optiv provides focus, capabilities and experience

During his remarks, Lynch provided a passionate assessment of Optiv’s place in the market, noting that his company is “built for this moment, for this challenging time for our clients” and “we can stand shoulder to shoulder and help solve problems.” He added that Optiv’s heritage as a value-added reseller provided a solid foundation for evolution to a full-breadth security services company. “We don’t start and stop with [a VAR role],” he explained, “but bring consulting and tech talent to wrap around solutions and provide integrated outcomes.” Lynch contrasted Optiv with IT services vendors and consultancies that have a security services business as part of their overall suite of offerings and capabilities. Optiv just does security, and in Lynch’s telling, clients appreciate that singular focus.

 

Lynch spoke at length about the current challenges facing CISOs, including a challenging market for talent, accrued technical debt and legacy tools, many of which are not integrated and cannot coherently and consistently deliver business, data or technology outcomes. Added to this environment, Lynch said CISOs face changing reporting structures and must now do more than simply provision technology; CISOs now have to deliver business results, a shift Lynch described as “from inputs to outcomes.” Further, Lynch said cybersecurity attack surfaces and perimeters got stretched because of the pandemic and remote working, raising questions for CISOs about whether that expansion would become permanent. Lynch speculated most enterprises would remain hybrid for the coming decade, resulting in sustained demand for security services.

 

To meet these challenges, Lynch said Optiv brings its twin technology and services pillars, as well as the full 450-partner ecosystem, in a differentiated way, delivering full capabilities against CISOs’ current needs. In addition, the company launched its first solution using its own processes and will be aggressive in the near term on innovation and development, potentially also using acquisitions to expand across the market and into additional geographies.

Lynch and John Johnson, Optiv’s VP for Cyber Strategy & Transformation, noted competitors provide technology solutions but rarely have the ability to identify system dependencies and do not focus on business processes, leading to gaps in data and understanding about clients’ business-critical processes. Johnson noted that traditional IT services providers and consultancies do not approach resiliency and recovery with the same rigor as Optiv, speculating that these competitors perhaps lack talent who have responded to real and substantial ransomware attacks. On a final note about differentiation, Lynch said Optiv has experienced people who have seen the bad outcomes that can happen, are battle scarred and know what is really needed.

 

TBR has written extensively about IT services vendors’ and consultancies’ cybersecurity practices, having been briefed by those vendors, visited security operations centers and seen demonstrations of leading-edge solutions. But even with scale and people who are passionate about their craft, those security services practices remain only a part of the vendor’s or company’s overall business. Lynch is right in saying Optiv’s focus on only cybersecurity separates his company from competitors, no matter those competitors’ scale and client base.

Further, TBR’s research on digital transformation (DT) (see Figures 1, 2 and 3) illustrates two trends beneficial to Optiv: buyers continue to make security a priority, and buyers increasingly want an ecosystem of vendors, not “one throat to choke.” Optiv’s business model pivot to expanding beyond being a VAR, combined with the expertise Optiv has been recruiting in recent years and an emphasis on consulting — yes, Optiv now does change management consulting as part of its cybersecurity strategy engagements — appears to round out a complete picture of a most capable security services company that is well suited for the coming changes in the security services market. In Lynch’s words, TBR believes Optiv may be “built for this moment.”

Technologies Purchased for Central Digital Transformation Initiative

Figure 1

Digital transformation adopters overview

Figure 2

Importance of attributes in digital transformation services vendor selection

Figure 3

 

TBR includes coverage of cybersecurity services in individual vendor reports, benchmarks and market landscapes, with all analysis based on the individual strategies, performances and activities of the IT services vendors and consultancies in TBR’s scope. Foundational reports used for this special report include IT Services Vendor Benchmark, Digital Transformation Insights Report: Voice of the Customer Research and Management Consulting Benchmark. Access these reports and more with a 60-day free trial of TBR Insight Center™.

Unisys executes rebranding efforts to transform its image in the IT services space


Unisys hosted its first in-person Analyst Day event in Boston on June 2 to bring together leaders from segment groups and the top leadership team to discuss the company’s strategy pivot and refreshed branding image within the IT services space. CEO Peter Altabef; SVP and CTO Dwayne Allen; SVP and CMO Teresa Poggenpohl; and SVP and Chief Commercial Officer Maureen Sweeny led the presentation, walking through partnerships, modern workplace solutions and cloud strategies that will propel the company through 2022 and into 2023. Leon Gilbert, GM of Digital Workplace Solutions, and Mike McGarvey, senior director of Global Hybrid Cloud, led the discussion on Digital Workplace Solutions, and Manju Naglapur, GM of Cloud and Infrastructure Solutions, and Dan Chalk, senior director of Cloud and Infrastructure Solutions, discussed Cloud, Infrastructure and Application Services.

TBR Perspective

Over the past year, Unisys has executed on rebranding and marketing efforts to transform its image in the IT services space and offer a refreshed technology portfolio that allows the company to expand revenue and profitability.

 

Centering its solutions and talent around four key areas — Digital Workplace Solutions, Cloud, Infrastructure and Application Services, Business Process Solutions and Enterprise Computing Solutions — helps Unisys provide clients with the tools and services to uphold their modernized workplaces. To execute on this transformation, Unisys expanded its ecosystem to include the expertise, technology capabilities and scale required to move beyond traditional services needs and highlight its broadened experience and optimized portfolio. By leaning on its expanded ecosystem and undertaking internal innovation projects, Unisys has developed industry-specialized applications that better fit within clients’ environments.

 

As part of its rebranding, Unisys refined its talent strategy, looking to fill gaps around technology and make cultural improvements to bolster its companywide shift. With increasing competition around talent, Unisys aims to ensure it can recruit and retain resources that support growth opportunities. Unisys is not alone with attrition pressures as peers have also experienced jumps in attrition rates, particularly over the last 18 months, pushing vendors to hire and offset talent shortages.


Free Webinar: 5G infrastructure spend has peaked – should you be concerned?




Changing marketing and portfolio trends

Unisys executed on refreshing its brand and marketing plan to better align its business offerings and market positioning to clients’ needs. A core piece of the company’s marketing transition was building partnerships with clients and instilling trust across its engagements, which will serve as a lead-in for both new and old clients and guide the integration of new technologies and solutions within IT environments. To support this end, Unisys updated its website to leverage a more content-oriented approach, showcasing client testimonials and experiences as well as outcomes. Additionally, increased marketing efforts to grow awareness of its portfolio and wealth of experience transform Unisys’ image and guide business model shifts. Increasing brand trust improves market perception, which will help Unisys grow its client base and existing engagements as well as attract new talent.

 

Shifting its marketing approach created opportunities for Unisys in the C-Suite. As clients look to establish new security, cloud, digital, and environmental, social and governance (ESG) offerings, Unisys strengthens its ability to engage with different levels within the C-Suite to guide these projects. The content-driven approach is geared toward attracting higher-level stakeholders and generating larger-scale transformation projects.

 

By deepening its involvement in the ESG market, Unisys is able to better help clients address their sustainability targets and improve their environmental footprints. In 2006 Unisys set internal targets to control and reduce emissions and outputs, which helped it gain experience and outcomes in the area. Unisys has since updated its targets to continue its progress toward the company’s sustainability goals.

 

Developing the internal skills and resources needed to implement the company’s sustainability goals enables Unisys to execute on similar efforts for clients, particularly in Europe, where it has helped clients adapt to new regulations regarding emissions and energy consumption. Unisys also executes on the social and cultural aspects of ESG to help clients improve internally and externally.

 

In July TBR published the special report, Atos’ sustainability play relies on ecosystems, science and leading by example, which expands on the customer-zero approach, showcasing the SI vendors that have created more resonant use cases. For example, according to the report, “Atos has rarely presented itself as customer zero, but with sustainability the vendor has been showing its own standards to clients and the internal lessons learned on adoption, measurement and change management.” By expanding its breadth of ESG capabilities and its brand recognition, Unisys has established a foundation it can build upon in its growth areas.

 

Business models shifts, including support from Unisys’ external branding and marketing efforts to transform market perception, have allowed the company to lead with trust and deliver on clients’ needs to drive outcomes, leaning on its portfolio depth and partner ecosystem. Showcasing the depth of its portfolio and services will allow Unisys to better lead discussions with new stakeholders within emerging areas.

Emphasizing digital workplace and cloud

As clients execute on larger-scale transformation projects, they look for vendors to guide projects from beginning to end and to provide support following completion. Repositioning through marketing plans and a refreshed portfolio image allows Unisys to serve as a go-to partner for its clients.

 

The key theme of partnerships and value-driven outcomes for clients was embedded throughout the event, serving as evidence of Unisys’ efforts to improve relationship management and the relevancy of its portfolio. By working closely with clients to update their environments and business strategies, underpinned by emerging technologies, Unisys can enable clients to respond more quickly to market changes and operate more cost effectively. While the majority of Unisys’ revenue is generated through outsourcing and support and maintenance — which represent approximately 65% of total revenue — consulting work is helping to guide the adoption of digital workplace and cloud solutions. Expanding those conversations with clients will expand the breadth of Unisys’ consulting experience and ability to guide transformations.

 

During the event Unisys also highlighted its partner ecosystem and the roles it plays in accelerating digital transformation and helping the company grow its portfolio around both consulting capabilities and emerging technology. Forging partnerships enhances Unisys’ value proposition around industry solutions, improving its ability to identify and address clients’ transformative needs.

 

Additionally, Unisys incorporates consulting services derived from partnerships to better guide cloud migrations to Amazon Web Services and other hyperscaler solutions. This aligns with TBR’s findings in its May 2022 Digital Transformation: Voice of the Customer Research, which supports the idea that SIs will be capable of delivering an ecosystem of solutions to enable transformation. According to the report, “While cloud migration and IT modernization continue to provide the bulk of the services opportunities, buyers, especially the ones that have led the way in terms of adopting a business-first, technology-second mindset, are now demonstrating an appetite for experimenting with new technologies in areas such as AI, enabling them to further enhance customer experience.”

 

TBR’s June 2022 Digital Transformation: Cloud Ecosystems Market Landscape also emphasizes the need of hyperscaler partners is deeply rooted in platforms and scale to transformation projects. The market landscape states, “While hyperscalers’ platform capabilities provide the necessary hooks into IT systems, both new and old, to enable the construction of hybrid IT and cloud environments, the SI community serves as the tip of hyperscalers’ go-to-market spear, capable of establishing the business case for emerging DT [digital transformation] initiatives to gain the trust and buy-in from a diverse array of buyers.”

 

Working with partners supplements Unisys’ internal innovation efforts to deepen its experience around digital workplace services and cloud solutions. During this event, Unisys walked through its digital solutions, including intelligent workplace services, modern device management and Workplace as a Service as well as its cloud solutions such as cloud data and analytics, management and hybrid infrastructure services. The solutions help clients navigate technology debt — debt incurred from technical assets and/or data centers — while also modernizing traditional elements, bridging the gap between legacy and emerging areas. Addressing the cost impacts in addition to technology needs allows Unisys to serve as a trusted partner for its clients, enabling them to sustain and manage transformations.

Differentiation through trust

While differentiation presents a challenge for all vendors, Unisys leans on its client engagement and relationship management to serve as a go-to partner and deliver across different needs. Instilling trust by testing and working on capabilities internally, such as around ESG with company targets, can help bolster conversations with clients. Strong relationships with clients help increase awareness of Unisys’ portfolio depth and efforts to transform the company’s image in the market. Centering engagements on trust through outcome-driven solutions that bring value to clients leads to higher renewals for Unisys and new logo generation. Showcasing client experiences and business outcomes on the website and through digital marketing efforts will resonate with clients and prospects and guide further discussions.

 

Unisys’ efforts to grow its cloud portfolio and support its partner solution adoption provide opportunities for the company to drive larger-scale transformations. More specifically, Unisys executes on technology debt reduction, creates interoperability between different environments and devices, and increases internal agility to respond more rapidly to client needs. The portfolio expansion allows Unisys to help clients navigate multicloud complexities as well as guide the use of applications to help modernize business operations and utilize data. Leaning on its client relationships, Unisys proactively helps clients solve current problems while creating more resilient business environments that can be more flexible when confronted with unexpected challenges.

Conclusion

As clients’ and market needs change, Unisys evaluated its portfolio offerings and infused an expanded set of digital workplace and cloud solutions to refresh its business strategy and align with client requirements. Coupled with a more active marketing strategy that centers on content and experience underpinned by client testimonials, Unisys helps progress beyond traditional transformation engagements to deliver on more complex cloud and digital transformations.

 

Working as a partner to guide clients through challenges and improve their flexibility further strengthens Unisys’ position as a trusted vendor that can drive outcomes and value. A greater emphasis on clients’ needs, with outcomes at the center, will continue to showcase Unisys’ ability to deliver on changing market dynamics and accelerate from a revenue growth and portfolio expansion perspective alongside its clients.

CSP spend on 5G infrastructure peaks in 2022

 

Join Principal Analyst Chris Antlitz Thursday, Sept. 1, for an exclusive look at key trends in the global 5G market, including spend trends by operator type and region as well as technology and use case trends. Our findings are based on TBR’s recently published 5G Telecom Market Forecast, which includes current-year market sizing and a five-year forecast by multiple 5G market segments and geographies.

 

In this FREE webinar you’ll learn:

  • How communication service providers (CSPs) are justifying their 5G investments
  • Which regions and countries are driving 5G infrastructure spend and when
  • Which use cases CSPs are focusing on

 

 

 

 

Previous TBR webinars can be viewed anytime on TBR’s Webinar Portal. For additional information or to arrange a briefing with our analysts, please contact TBR at [email protected].

Benchmarking alliance performance through objective data metrics

 

Benchmarking alliance performance in the technology sector requires disruption. Legacy partner program metrics are misaligned to the way end customers seek to procure technology solutions. The disruption stems from multiparty alliances where current benchmark metrics lean toward the sponsoring alliance partner rather than toward the ecosystem or the end customer.

 

Discussion Points

  • Objective data each type of ecosystem participant — platform vendor, hyperscaler, systems integrator, large enterprise software vendor and small independent software vendor — should benchmark
  • Objective data metrics emerging to monitor ecosystem performance
  • How these measurements, in the form of contractual commitments, need to be simplified to suit the ecosystem rather than the participant’s operating model

 

 

 

This webinar is part of the ASAP Webinar Series and is hosted by ASAP, a TBR partner.

Previous TBR webinars can be viewed anytime on TBR’s Webinar Portal. For additional information or to arrange a briefing with our analysts, please contact TBR at [email protected].

Digital twins and 5G abundance: The continuation of the Atos smart cities story


Earlier this month, TBR reconnected with Albert Seubers, Atos’ global strategy director for Smart Society, to discuss developments in the smart city space broadly and Atos’ efforts specifically. TBR has examined smart cities from a variety of perspectives in recent years, including how smaller versions of cities, such as ports and arenas, could serve as test beds for the technologies and services needed to overcome the regulatory, change management and political challenges foundational to most smart city opportunities. The following reflects TBR’s discussion with Seubers as well as ongoing research around smart cities, digital transformation and Atos.

Connectivity among emerging technologies boosts hope for more smart cities

In TBR’s view, as the ecosystems around emerging technologies foster increased adoption by enterprises and create scalable use cases, municipalities can more easily understand the potential for smart city projects. The technology gets faster, cheaper, more reliable and more connected, all of which opens possibilities for more technologies.

Understanding that the exponential acceleration of connections between IoT, edge, analytics and AI, made possible through wider cloud and 5G adoption, has expanded the technological possibilities of smart city projects, Atos and other IT services can now position smart city engagements as relatively safe investments. The technology will work as expected, with the necessary connectivity sustained and the analytics providing useful information for decision making.

As TBR has previously noted, technology limitations do not hold back smart city use cases; political will and budgets do. Atos’ approach to tackling the technology challenges while managing the people — politicians, regulators, citizens — reflects this understanding and leans on Atos’ long-standing reputation for consistently delivering against the needs of clients, including municipalities, first responders and other actors within a smart city environment.


Digital twins will be the next 5G as 5G becomes ubiquitous

According to Seubers, digital twins have emerged as the latest hot topic within the smart cities ecosystem, particularly in the U.S. Seubers described digital twin-enabled solutions designed to forecast traffic models and emissions, using a digital representation of the city to include elements such as air quality and sound-related stress. Turning to 5G, Seubers commented on the disparities in adoption across the globe.

Many cities in Asia and some in the Middle East, Seubers said, have already rolled out 5G, although reliability has varied considerably. Europe broadly remains in a transitory state, with very few examples of citywide 5G coverage and usage. “It’s the promise,” Seubers said, but to date no cities have successfully deployed at scale, with data and privacy still very much country-to-country issues, further complicating any broad adoption across the region. The U.S. lags.

As for the benefits of 5G to smart city opportunities, Seubers lamented that too many municipal leaders invest in 5G rollouts and “expect change will happen,” without fully understanding the potential use cases, challenges and changes that will arise once 5G is in place and in use. That uncertainty around potential failures and fears of misspent public funds, of course, provides an opportunity for Atos.

Critically, data remains the linchpin for every smart city application. Atos’ experience with collecting, cleansing, orchestrating, analyzing and protecting data provides the vendor with the trusted expertise municipalities demand for any smart cities project. City leaders, who are confident that a smart city deployment will provide citizens with added value and not compromise citizens’ data — better government without Big Brother — will advocate for, budget for and defend their initiatives while looking to their smart city vendors to provide those assurances. The technology, all parties will agree, is not the challenge — it is the data and the people.

Tackling bite-sized projects to avoid having too many cooks

Addressing the second half of the smart cities challenge — the people — Seubers said Atos has learned through experience that having too many decision makers unnecessarily complicates priorities, timelines and adoption. Change management becomes unruly and even the technology ecosystem can become overburdened with niche players supported, politically, by a variety of municipal stakeholders.

Atos’ proven approach centers on specific departments within a city, delivering results on a small scale and demonstrating value to the wider municipality. One key to success, according to Seubers and common to nearly every digital transformation effort: executive-level commitment. Helping gain leadership buy-in, Seubers explained Atos has been using its global network of Business Technology & Innovation Centers (BTICs) for “inspiration sessions” to help municipal leaders think beyond a single problem and beyond a single technology solution. Due to travel restrictions in recent years, the BTIC Studio network has proven to be a great asset for driving online inspiration sessions, working with different BTICs in parallel during customer meetings.

As an example, he cited a session in Atos’ Vienna BTIC in which five major Polish municipalities will discuss a range of smart city projects, examining both proven use cases around Europe and solutions particularly well suited to Poland, including data privacy laws, technology infrastructure, and federal and municipal funding structures.

In TBR’s view, Atos’ strategy depends on determining where small-scale projects can be launched, delivering quick success and then expanding methodically throughout a municipality’s broader smart city landscape. This creates minimal initial budgetary commitments, provides leaders time to gain citizen buy-in and allows Atos the flexibility in proposing specific solutions, in contrast to a cookie-cutter, one-size-fits-all-cities, technology-first approach. Atos also recognizes that smart cities can only succeed when the human components — leaders, technology professionals and citizens — benefit in meaningful and measurable ways.

Market and competitive intelligence straight to your inbox each month, absolutely FREE




Next for Atos: Expanding where the opportunities are, delivering technology

If abundant 5G and advances around digital twin technology spark a resurgence in smart cities, TBR anticipates Atos will continue to turn inspiration sessions into small-scale implementations across Europe and in some select cities outside the vendor’s home region. [Tweet this!]

Asian and Middle Eastern municipalities may become an increasingly lucrative market as well, as the combination of rapid 5G deployment, typically fewer decision makers, and newer technology infrastructure in those regions matches well with Atos’ capabilities and approach. Expanding in APAC through smart cities could be a faster route to growth for Atos than options elsewhere outside Europe. In addition, TBR anticipates Atos will increasingly conflate sustainability and smart cities offerings, building on the core value proposition that smart cities can be part of a municipality’s and country’s decarbonization strategy.

One final note: Atos is unabashedly a science-driven company among IT services peers that often emphasize consulting, outsourcing or both. As much as smart city projects depend on advising leaders and managing stakeholders, citizens will always want to know one thing for certain: Does the technology work? On this point, Atos’ track record of getting the science, technology and data right gives the vendor a quietly strong market position should a spike in smart cities demand emerge in the near term.

Not just rocket science: Hypersonic missiles and the U.S.


Hiccups in hitting hypersonic speeds

U.S. interest in hypersonic missiles, projectiles capable of maneuvering midflight while maintaining a minimum speed of Mach 5, has surged over the last few years. The Department of Defense’s (DOD) budget for hypersonic research grew 18.8% year-to-year from $3.2 billion in FY21 to $3.8 billion in FY22. Now, the proposed FY23 budget for this research is set to expand by 23.7% year-to-year and reach $4.7 billion.

 

TBR analysts anticipate the final budget will ultimately be even larger after the Senate Armed Services Committee requested in June that over $44 billion be added to the initially proposed $773 billion defense budget for FY23. [Tweet this!] Yet despite further funds being rapidly reallocated to support its hypersonic programs, the U.S. has been hampered by multiple troubling and public setbacks. In October 2021 the booster stack on the Conventional Prompt Strike prototype failed during a launch, and as a result, the hypersonic glide vehicle test was called off.

 

In November 2021 the U.S. Space Force’s vice chief of space operations, Gen. David D. Thompson, raised concerns that the U.S. was falling behind Russia and China in developing hypersonic technologies. In February 2022 a meeting was called between U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and representatives from prominent defense contractors including Northrop Grumman (NYSE: NOC), Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT) and Raytheon Technologies (NYSE: RTX) over the need to enhance and expedite the development of hypersonic technologies going forward. The group also discussed what has been disrupting the progress of their respective hypersonics projects. Limited usage of test sites, supply chain pressures and unsatisfactory funds were cited as persistent, underlying issues.

Grab your free copy of TBR’s Top 3 Predictions for Federal IT Services in 2022

 

On June 29, the U.S. hypersonics program incurred another setback with its Conventional Prompt Strike prototype. The Common Hypersonic Glide Body (C-HGB) trial was deemed a failure by the DOD after an “an anomaly occurred following ignition of the test asset,” according to Lt. Cmdr. Tim Gorman of the U.S. Navy.

 

While recent reports indicate that the U.S. Navy still expects the C-HGB will be ready to be fit onto a Zumwalt-class destroyer in 2025 before being integrated with a Virginia-class submarine in 2028, there is uncertainty about whether speeding up hypersonic weapons development could result in even more issues when working with these complex designs. This is especially true if access to testing facilities remains constrained, limiting the “test often, fail fast and learn” methodology associated with the nation’s hypersonic programs.

 

On top of trying to run tests more often and with fewer disruptions, the Pentagon has struggled to find cost-effective ways to develop hypersonic weapons. As Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering Heidi Shyu stated in October 2021, “We need to figure out how to drive towards more affordable hypersonics.” Yet the budget requests to study hypersonics have only trended upward. The Pentagon’s own estimates suggest the U.S. Air Force’s hypersonic missiles will cost up to $106 million apiece, causing concern about the feasibility of amassing an arsenal of these weapons over the next decade.

Recent progress in next-generation weapons development

While frustrations have been increasingly mounting about the state of the nation’s hypersonic weapons programs, some prolific U.S. initiatives have been making notable progress.

 

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency’s (DARPA) Hypersonic Air-breathing Weapon Concept (HAWC) initiative led to Raytheon Missiles & Defense allying with Northrop Grumman to compete against a team composed of Lockheed Martin and Aerojet Rocketdyne (NYSE: AJRD).

 

In late September 2021 the Raytheon Missiles & Defense and Northrop Grumman team successfully trial-launched their scramjet HAWC from an aircraft, ensuring the missile maintained a speed of over Mach 5, approximately six months before Lockheed Martin and Aerojet Rocketdyne were able to conduct their own free-flight test. Now with the HAWC program’s flight-test goals achieved, DARPA is taking the next step by launching MoHAWC. This new initiative will see the two teams further mature their respective designs, including advancing their scramjet propulsion systems.

 

Beyond HAWC and MoHAWC, the U.S. government has been investing in several other offensive hypersonic weapons programs. The Operational Fires (OpFires) and Tactical Boost Glide (TBG) initiatives are a couple, but recently the Air-launched Rapid Response Weapon (ARRW) program made notable progress. After a series of setbacks, Lockheed Martin’s AGM-183A ARRW completed its booster experiments following another successful trial on July 12, meaning that all-up-round testing will take place during 2H22.

Responding to threats faster than the speed of sound

In its FY23 budget request, the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) asked for $225 million to support its hypersonic defense programs, including its Glide Phase Interceptor (GPI), a solution meant to strike a hostile hypersonic missile during its glide phase.

 

Raytheon Missiles & Defense, Northrop Grumman and Lockheed Martin were awarded contracts in November 2021 to develop a GPI prototype concept design. In June the MDA moved on from Lockheed Martin for this project, compounding the contractor’s troubles after the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) blocked its acquisition of Aerojet Rocketdyne. The MDA has since awarded approximately $41.4 million to Northrop Grumman and $41.5 million to Raytheon Missiles & Defense to develop their own prototypes.

 

Northrop Grumman’s GPI design is meant to leverage the capabilities of the Hypersonic and Ballistic Tracking Space Sensor (HBTSS). This constellation of low-Earth orbit satellites would detect when a hypersonic or ballistic missile was fired, then relay relevant data to the GPI to assist with destroying the incoming threat. The contractor is competing to develop the HBTSS as well as the GPI, hoping to secure both contracts. Northrop Grumman and L3Harris Technologies Inc. (NYSE: LHX) are set to launch their respective HBTSS prototypes around 2Q23, which will be monitored for a period of at least six months before any final decision is made.

GAO concerns

Both the GPI and HBTSS programs came under scrutiny by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) in June, with the agency recommending the DOD play a bigger role in their development. The GAO highlighted that the MDA is not actively working on the HBTSS initiative in conjunction with the DOD’s Space Force and Space Development Agency, limiting its potential positives. The GAO also indicated that the MDA was not seeking an independent technological risk assessment or independent cost estimate for the GPI.

Superpowers showcasing their recent successes

China and Russia have been increasingly flexing their newfound hypersonic capabilities on the world stage over the last year, leading to fears that the U.S. hypersonics program is underperforming.

Intelligence reports stipulate that the “routine spacecraft experiment” China claimed it conducted during August 2021 was a nuclear-capable long-range hypersonic missile that had been fired into space, rounded the globe and struck a deliberate target.

 

With China aiming to have a stockpile of 1,000 nuclear warheads by 2030, the nation has gained a new invaluable asset. On July 4, China showcased its Feitian-1 hypersonic missile. Reports indicate this projectile does not require as strong of an initial booster as previous hypersonic weapons. It features a lightweight waverider design with an adaptable kerosene combined-cycle rocket/ramjet engine, enabling it to either deliver a heavier payload or hold additional fuel.

 

Russia revealed in October 2021 that the nation successfully completed its first Tsirkon hypersonic cruise missile launch from a submarine, giving Russian submarines the capacity to strike targets 660 miles away at Mach 9 while remaining underwater. The nation has also been actively demonstrating the capabilities of its hypersonic arsenal in the Ukraine, utilizing Kinzhal hypersonic air-launched ballistic missiles to wreak havoc on targets.

 

Dubbed the Satan-2, Russia’s RS-28 Sarmat nuclear hypersonic missile entered production in June following a successful test in April. The 220-ton, 116-foot-long intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) has a range calculated to be between 6,200 and 11,180 miles while being able to carry 15 light or 10 heavy Multiple Independently Targetable Re-Entry Vehicles (MIRVs) containing warheads to decimate multiple targets in a single launch. The RS-28 Sarmat ICBM is expected to undergo further tests in July before serial production begins.

What is next?

As the U.S. looks to remain competitive with China and Russia and expand its capabilities, more resources will be set aside to mature the U.S.’ hypersonic weapon as well as defense efforts at an expedited rate. Human-operated directed energy (DE) weapons, which could be used to defend against incoming threats, including hypersonic missiles and hypersonic glide vehicles, are an option the DOD has expressed interest in.

 

To function at their desired level, these devices will need AI system support to assist with targeting incoming threats, minimizing collateral damage and helping warfighters get comfortable with weaponry faster. TBR anticipates that Booz Allen Hamilton (NYSE: BAH) will be one of the leaders in getting this emerging battlefield technology to seamlessly function with AI programs that will receive data from a network of sensors. [Tweet this!] Inevitably these programs will become integral assets within the DOD’s Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2) vision, giving U.S. armed forces an edge on the ever-evolving battlefield.

 

While income from hypersonic programs will not comprise the bulk of contractors’ profits, they will propel meaningful revenue growth. As a result, Alliances with peers capable of expanding a contractor’s reach will be crucial. For example, in January 2022 Booz Allen Hamilton formed a partnership with Stratolaunch to study hypersonic aerospace systems to bring more consistent and less expensive hypersonic flight environments to the DOD and others looking to conduct experiments.

 

Developing technology that can support the hypersonic programs will also be a way to generate new revenue streams, with Leidos’ (NYSE: LDOS) Dynetics winning a $478.6 million contract in November 2021 to design thermal protection solutions for long-range, surface-to-surface hypersonic weapons (LRHW).

 

Contractors will continue to position themselves to support the DOD’s vision that it will have a hypersonic missile battery by FY23, DDG 1000 ships fitted with hypersonic weapons by FY25 and a hypersonic cruise missile by FY27, yet they will also keep an eye on international interest. Analysts believe the global hypersonic technology market in 2020 was worth $4.98 billion. By 2030, they forecast it will have reached $12.2 billion and expanded at a CAGR of between 9.5% and 10%. Contractors will undoubtedly pitch their solutions to clients beyond U.S. shores in the future as global defense spending continues to ramp up.

Automatic for the people: PwC’s surprising tool in the battle to attain and retain talent

Robotic process automation and citizen-led strategies may upend talent management for the better

Every consultancy and IT services vendor — along with many of their clients — faces challenges recruiting and retaining people. PwC may have found a surprising tool in the war for talent and battle against attrition: automation. Seriously. Combined with analytics and deployed with intensive change management, intelligent automation may be one of PwC’s key methods for helping the firm and its clients attract and keep talent. [Tweet this!]

 

In late June, TBR met with Kevin Kroen and Kevin Schwartz, both PwC partners and leaders in the firm’s Intelligent Automation practice. The following reflects that discussion as well as TBR’s previous reporting on and ongoing analysis of PwC, particularly PwC Products.


Market and competitive intelligence straight to your inbox each month, absolutely FREE




Rethinking automation: Citizen-led, advanced and ubiquitous

Kroen began the discussion by explaining that in the early and mid-2010s, PwC tried to build a full automation practice as a premium brand in a nonpremium business. The firm’s consulting around automation gained some traction, but clients were frequently reluctant to pay for substantial automation consulting engagements. In addition, PwC consistently came in as an expensive choice for implementation, particularly against India-centric IT services vendors.

 

When PwC assessed the market, a diverse set of competitors appeared to be delivering subpar value to clients. In many cases, automation software vendors and systems integrators (SIs) crammed technology solutions into business processes without a good fit. Clients failed to engage in the strategic thinking about their automation needs and goals prior to buying an automation solution.

 

Rather than being part of a larger technology or digital transformation strategy, automation was “single-threaded” and had minimal adoption. Most damaging to overall client value, the SIs and automation software vendors ignored the necessary change management.

 

So, in 2019 PwC did a rethink and came up with three key components to a new intelligent automation offering: citizen-led, advanced and fully wrapped into all of PwC’s existing practices. As described by Kroen, citizen-led imagines enterprise professionals outside of IT being trained for and prepared to use automation, embracing the tools, and becoming users and even innovators. For PwC, launching the Digital Fitness app in November 2017 started the firm on its journey to citizen-led digital upskilling and, nearly five years later, the firm’s own success has become a use case it brings to the market: It worked for us; it can work for you too. (For a detailed description of PwC’s citizen-led approach, click here.)

 

The second component, broader and more advanced automation, emerged from the realization that the right automation tool kit — developed with PwC Alliances — had become table stakes across the market and PwC needed to build peripheral capabilities that allowed clients to apply automation solutions to their most challenging problems, not just simple processes.

 

According to PwC, the firm’s technology investments and alliances allowed it to deliver on the promise of seamless, intelligent, advanced automation. And lastly, PwC pivoted from selling automation as a stand-alone service to wrapping automation into the firm’s practices and offerings, including tax, audit, risk and consulting.

 

While this was not an overnight change — business model and cultural shifts never are — Schwartz said some practices embraced automation more quickly than others and, overall, PwC had substantially transitioned to bringing automation to clients through all practices. For example, PwC partners leading the Digital Value Creation offering within Fit for Growth now include automation in their proposals, fully baking the tools and value propositions into the offering’s go-to-market approach.

Embracing the employee experience of working with, not being replaced by, automation

Kroen stepped back from discussing the specifics of PwC’s automation practice today to describe automation’s likely evolution, saying that relatively soon the low-hanging fruit would be consumed and automation would become part of innovation, helping enterprises disrupt themselves and change faster.

 

According to Kroen, the “end state will be digitally native” employees who use automation to grow the business, not simply to reduce costs by streamlining processes. From cost-cutting to growth through — and this is where PwC may be unlocking a tool in talent management — an improved employee experience. PwC’s use of automation, for itself and its clients, revolves around people, not tools.

 

If enterprises embrace change management as critical to automation adoption, upskilled employees will not have to worry about losing their jobs to automation but instead will use intelligent tools to work faster and spend less time on repetitive tasks and can graduate from finding ways to cut costs to helping the enterprise grow. In the war for talent and the battle against attrition, automation becomes part of the solution. [Tweet this!]

 

For example, in TBR’s Spring 2022 Global Delivery Benchmark, we noted the impact automation could have in overcoming the talent obstacles emerging from the war in Ukraine: “In addition to employee attrition, which remains the most immediate threat to vendors’ performance and business models, the ongoing war in Ukraine is further disrupting vendors’ resource management strategies.

 

While so far there has been a minimal impact on vendors’ delivery models, the potential for the conflict to expand outside Ukraine’s borders keeps vendors on edge and going back to the drawing board when it comes to their business continuity plans.

 

TBR sees two immediate solutions to the challenge: diversify global footprints beyond traditional delivery hubs such as India, and ramp up automation in service delivery … we believe ramping up automation will allow vendors to decrease their reliance on India as a global delivery hub and possibly provide them with the necessary solution to combat the potential development of new clusters of state economies.”

 

As a firm-related example, Schwartz said newly hired tax and audit professionals at PwC were being trained on automation tools using the support of the firm’s Digital Labs professionals and the ProEdge learning platform. With clients, PwC partners have been able to demonstrate that the firm helped its own professionals build new skills and become better at and more engaged in their jobs, which makes work more enjoyable and challenging in a positive way.

 

Schwartz indicated that PwC understands, through its own internal experience and working with clients on automation, that upskilling an entire workforce is not the goal for any client. Instead, Schwartz said, the firm focuses on promoting the idea of “acumen and awareness for all” and training 20% to 30% of its employees to become power users. ProEdge, which TBR reported on previously, has become an important piece of PwC’s value proposition around automation and a citizen-led approach.

 

Kroen noted that PwC initially expected ProEdge would be a “transformative solution” impacting the professional development of the firm’s employees as well as a business model change as PwC embraced being a software vendor. ProEdge was initially going to be sold as a premier software offering, but in reality, consulting engagements around ProEdge have grown faster and more substantially than expected.

 

Clients understand the value of citizen-led innovation and expect PwC to provide the guidance and assistance needed to deploy ProEdge to its full extent. Kroen acknowledged the citizen-led approach remains a relatively new concept in the market and is not fully embraced by every industry or enterprise, which makes the prebuilt ProEdge solution, with proven outcomes based on PwC’s internal use, an excellent tool for selling the citizen-led concept, both internally and externally.

Who knew RPA could be HR’s best friend?

TBR did not anticipate coming away from a PwC automation briefing wondering if robotic process automation (RPA) — the dreaded job-killing RPA — held a secret to success in combating talent challenges, one of the most frequently discussed topics across IT services and management consulting.

 

While the discussion occasionally veered into technology details and PwC’s insights into pricing, the competitive landscape and internal challenges, TBR kept returning to the effect a strategic, citizen-led and change management-embracing approach to automation could have on talent across an enterprise. Upskilled and empowered employees will contribute to cost-cutting by being more effective, revenue growth by engaging in innovation, and overall operational efficiency by staying longer.

 

If PwC can combine this approach to automation with the firm’s overall approach to employee experience (see the upcoming special report on PwC My+), it may begin to separate itself from peers with respect to recruiting and retaining while simultaneously bringing added value to automation initiatives — and talent initiatives — at clients.

 

In the last few years, TBR has written extensively about both PwC and automation, including in the following special reports:

 

 

 

Choose your own adventure: PwC aims to remake the employee experience with My+ strategy


PwC’s My+ may revolutionize professional services talent management

If PwC’s plans pay off, in a few years every professional at the U.S. firm will have choice in how they work, determining for themselves what they do, where they do it, how much time they do it, whether they travel for work, and what benefits meet their needs. This choose-your-own-adventure approach to talent management, which PwC calls My+, could completely alter the way Big Four firms and other professional services vendors recruit, retain and manage their talent.

 

In the current market, with a war for talent and organizations competing for the same people, PwC could be at the leading edge of infusing analytics into pandemic-driven employee experience lessons and building a leading talent development program.


Market and competitive intelligence straight to your inbox each month, absolutely FREE

 

How The New Equation helped bring PwC to My+

In mid-June, TBR spoke with J.C. Lapierre, PwC’s U.S. chief strategy and communications officer, to better understand PwC’s My+, including how the initiative fits within the firm’s The New Equation strategy and framework and what the firm’s near-term expectations for the initiative are. The following reflects that discussion, separate TBR discussions with PwC professionals, and TBR’s ongoing research around PwC, management consulting, and the broader IT services space.

 

Lapierre started with an update on PwC’s The New Equation, roughly a year after launch, and outlined the five basic “chapters”: (1) trust and sustained outcomes, (2) investments in capabilities, (3) simplification and making PwC easier to work with, (4) the people experience, and (5) purpose and community.

 

TBR noted that multiple discussions with PwC professionals and the firm’s clients — inside and outside the U.S. — revealed that the firm’s emphasis on trust, as part of both the business strategy (Chapter 1) and the Trust Leadership Institute (integral to Chapter 5), resonated positively and provided professionals, stakeholders, and clients with a sense of the firm’s mission and direction. Regarding Chapter 3, Lapierre said clients had told her, “We are seeing a different PwC show up,” indicating internal efforts around removing friction and bringing a new way of teaming to every client had begun to show results.

 

To explain PwC’s My+ approach, Lapierre described an imaginary PwC professional (the heart of Chapter 4), making the following choices: What type of work do I want to do, and with what kinds of clients and engagements? Where do I want to work, and how much of my time will be in the office or remote? How much do I want to travel for work? How many hours per week do I want to work? And what benefits matter most to me, aside from compensation?

 

Once the employee makes his or her choices, the firm responds with an offer: “Here is the compensation, and this is the career path.” Lapierre believes this approach allows employees to feel they have a choice in what their PwC experience will be — an employee can “cultivate and curate the career” they want while being part of a community.

 

A core component of My+ is development and how PwC will be a “leading developer of talent,” enabling employees to succeed elsewhere if they choose to leave the firm. Lapierre recognized this kind of radical change requires cultural shifts within PwC, technology enablement, and a commitment by leadership to evolve the program and the firm over the next three years. In TBR’s view, should this vision become a reality, PwC will have radically transformed itself and the professional services space.

Shifting the traditional work culture by supporting well-being

Underpinning PwC’s My+ strategy, according to Lapierre, are four pillars: Well-being, Total Rewards, Development, and Always a PwCer. After noting that the U.S. firm had already announced it would be shutting down its operations for a second week each year to allow employees to recharge, Lapierre said the efforts around well-being would include “protected time,” in which an employee’s bosses and peers would be notified that the employee would not be available.

 

The technology aspect of this initiative would include prompts before taking protected time and analytics around employees’ actual behavior. Further, by introducing “upward feedback” and emphasizing across the entire firm the importance of protected time for promoting well-being, Lapierre believes individuals will be both empowered and held accountable.

 

In TBR’s view, professional services firms — and most notably the Big Four firms — struggle with balancing client demands and partners’ expectations with employees’ need for time away from work. Some firms’ partners develop professionals with 70-plus-hour workweeks and expect the same from new hires. Shifting this culture and enabling employees’ protected time stays the employee’s own would be a significant change and, in TBR’s view, may be necessary to retain talent coming into the workforce post-pandemic.

 

With Total Rewards, the firm intends to enhance benefits, including providing additional resources around mental health, and continue offering competitive compensation. Always a PwCer reflects the firm’s understanding that cultivating its alumni network can benefit current employees by demonstrating possibilities beyond PwC. In a circular approach to fostering sustained relationships, PwC will offer alumni continued access to professional and career development tools. For both these pillars, TBR believes PwC has incorporated lessons learned from managing professionals through the pandemic, including the need to expand the firm’s understanding of employees’ needs beyond standard expectations.

The carrots of professional development and the need for accountability

To cultivate “top talent,” as Lapierre described PwC’s professionals, the firm’s approach to the Development pillar will include master classes demonstrating “leadership in action.” Lapierre said the entire firm would participate, making a comparison to a TED talk-like, at scale, but also customized to PwC. In addition, the firm’s training and professional development initiatives will focus on “topical skills — what’s needed today” and will include recommended training curricula depending on the professional’s career path.

 

All four My+ pillars, Lapierre noted, will be “very personalized, tech-enabled,” and fully integrated across the entire firm. Understanding that the firm currently stands at the start of an expected three-year journey to the choices scenario described above, Lapierre said PwC will enlist around 1,000 current employees starting this fall to be “My+ Activators,” essentially evangelists for adoption and change.

 

When TBR questioned whether experienced PwC partners and longtime employees would welcome a new way of working, Lapierre said the firm believed in “leading with carrots” and giving all employees the necessary support to make changes. And the firm’s leadership believes that after a certain amount of time — and carrots — it is then about accountability.

When you make an empowered choice, you own it

Accountability might be the key to unlocking a successful choose-your-own-adventure career path. If this initiative works, in three years PwC employees will be empowered to choose not only what they work on but also how, where, when and how long they work while also being held accountable — to themselves and to the firm — for their choices. If this works, PwC will also have rewritten what work culture can look like at a Big Four firm and will, by example and by taking away top talent, force peers and competitors to change as well.

 

In TBR’s view, PwC should be able to pull this off. PwC Products marked a radical departure from traditional consulting and professional services while also evolving almost naturally from leadership, technology and business model decisions the firm had been making for years. The New Equation set a well-defined course for change with the North Star — trust — deeply rooted in the firm’s traditional culture and value proposition. The technology underpinnings for My+, including firmwide administrative tools and analytics, have been in place, tested and refined, for at least five years. And the talent — the professionals staffing services firms — are ready for change while expecting more from their employers: more flexibility, more benefits and more choices.

 

In all, PwC may have picked the right time to choose its own HR adventure.