2024-2029 Devices Market Forecast

TBR Spotlight Reports represent an excerpt of TBR’s full subscription research. Full reports and the complete data sets that underpin benchmarks, market forecasts and ecosystem reports are available as part of TBR’s subscription service. Click here to receive all new Spotlight Reports in your inbox.

TBR expects cyclical PC market dynamics and AI adoption to drive a single-digit devices CAGR from 2024 to 2029

After declining for several quarters due to market saturation and tightened corporate IT budgets, PC demand is gradually recovering, particularly on the commercial side of the market as organizations begin to refresh their fleets of devices. TBR expects the devices market to grow at roughly a 2.7% CAGR from 2024 to 2029 as this recovery in PC demand is supplemented by growing smartphone and tablet revenue. TBR also expects demand for AI advisory and consultancy services will increase as organizations invest in implementing AI across IT infrastructure and client devices.
 
The proliferation of AI across the IT space presents devices vendors with a range of growth opportunities. PC OEMs will remain focused on driving AI PC adoption and gradually increasing these devices as a mix of total PC shipments to drive long-term revenue growth and average revenue per unit (ARPU) expansion. To help speed this adoption and increase services revenue, vendors will also continue to build out suites of services designed to help organizations take advantage of the productivity gains offered by AI PCs. TBR expects vendors to continue to increase their non-PC revenue mix, capitalizing on growth opportunities presented by AI and sheltering their top lines and margins from potential fluctuations in the PC market.
 

Graph: Devices Market Share, 2024 and 2029 (Source: TBR)

Devices Market Share, 2024 and 2029 (Source: TBR)

Dell’s strong direct sales motion will help it maintain its top position in PC services revenue through 2029

PC services revenue is closely correlated with PC hardware revenue, but revenue recognition is often deferred. As a result, the trends in the overall devices market are slower to materialize in the PC services segment. PC sales declined for several quarters throughout 2022 and 2023, offering vendors less opportunity to attach services and constraining revenue growth in this segment. As 2025 progresses and PC unit shipments continue to expand year-to-year, PC services revenue growth momentum will gradually accelerate. Recovery in the commercial PC space will boost PC services performance, as commercial PCs carry higher services attach rates than their consumer counterparts.
 
Vendors will remain focused on mitigating the impacts of negative margin pressures on PC hardware by continuing to focus on increasing their PC services revenue mix relative to PC hardware revenue, with an emphasis on sustainability, cybersecurity and predictive analytics.
 
As AI becomes increasingly prevalent in the devices space, vendors will also continue to promote offerings designed to help organizations effectively adopt AI infrastructure and AI-enabled end-user devices. Offerings such as Lenovo’s AI Fast Start program and Dell Technologies’ Implementation Services for Microsoft Copilot are both designed to help organizations take advantage of the productivity gains that AI PCs offer.
 

If you believe you have access to the full research via your employer’s enterprise license or would like to learn how to access the full research, click the Access Research button.

Access Research

 

Although China is a weak market for some vendors, TBR expects Lenovo to take advantage of AI PC opportunities in the country to expand APAC revenue

TBR expects the APAC devices market to grow at a 2.7% CAGR from 2024 to 2029 — a rate on par with the global devices market.
 
Over the last several quarters, vendors such as Apple and HP Inc. have reported China as being a particularly weak market for their devices businesses due to persistent softness in demand.
 
TBR expects that among the vendors included in this forecast, Lenovo will reap the greatest benefit from recovering PC demand in China due to its already large market share and its AI PC strategy in the country. In May 2024 Lenovo rolled out a lineup of devices in the country it dubbed its “five-feature” AI PCs, including a personal agent and local large language model (LLM). The company reported strong initial uptake of these devices during its 2Q24 and 3Q24 earnings calls, and TBR expects ongoing momentum in China will help drive Lenovo’s PC segment and top-line growth throughout the forecast period.

3Q24 IT Services Vendor Benchmark

TBR Spotlight Reports represent an excerpt of TBR’s full subscription research. Full reports and the complete data sets that underpin benchmarks, market forecasts and ecosystem reports are available as part of TBR’s subscription service. Click here to receive all new Spotlight Reports in your inbox.

Overall revenue growth year-to-year for the vendors in TBR’s IT Services Vendor Benchmark will accelerate during 2025 aided by managed services activities, innovative portfolios and upskilling

As we review financial results from 3Q24 and 4Q24, we will likely see that macroeconomic uncertainty caused an overall IT services revenue deceleration in 2024. However, IT services spending will continue as clients seek run-the-business managed services opportunities to operate in challenging market conditions.
 
A new wave of outsourcing demand is picking up speed as buyers are inclined to switch from innovation to business resiliency in the event of economic turbulence. Multiple IT services providers are racing to capture as much business in the managed services space as they can before GenAI [generative AI] picks up and threatens the core value proposition centered on human-backed service delivery.
 
While vendors are experiencing a slowdown in consulting activities due to limited discretionary spending, the U.S. Federal Reserve’s three federal funds rate reductions during 4Q24 and general market expectations of two cuts in 2025, will likely improve buyers’ confidence and boost discretionary spending. TBR expects IT services peers with established consulting capabilities will race to capture the potential rise in spending, compelling vendors to constantly evaluate their value propositions to ensure trust and service quality. This is especially important as the prolonged slowdown in discretionary spending has given buyers an opportunity to assess digital stacks and vendors’ performance.
 
TBR expects IT services revenue growth for benchmarked vendors to accelerate during 2025 compared to rates in 2024. Broad-based investments in innovative portfolio offerings and acquisitions along with upskilling existing employees and recruiting higher-caliber talent in onshore and nearshore locations will contribute to revenue growth acceleration.
 

Graph: Overall Revenue and Growth for Benchmarked IT Services Vendors, 2024 Est. and 2025 Est. (Source: TBR)

Overall Revenue and Growth for Benchmarked IT Services Vendors, 2024 Est. and 2025 Est. (Source: TBR)

To position for growth in 2025, vendors continue to pursue opportunities around AI and GenAI, expand outsourcing capabilities through engineering services, and build local relationships in India

3Q24 Trends

Vendors invest in AI and GenAI solutions: While the overall short-term revenue growth slowdown in TBR’s IT Services Vendor Benchmark suggests some vendors might be in financial distress, the pipelines of AI- and GenAI-related opportunities suggest vendors are capturing emerging opportunities. Procurement, sales and marketing, customer service and software development are the go-to use cases around GenAI adoption. Use cases with demands on data, dependencies on external data and/or long horizons to ROI remain the subjects of innovation sessions, proofs of concept and road maps.
 
Vendors develop engineering services portfolios: Multiple IT services providers are enhancing their outsourcing capabilities by investing in engineering services and silicon design services. Such initiatives position vendors for a new wave of outsourcing services funded by operational technology buyers, which are a new type of buyers for some of the vendors. GenAI provides a new conduit for managed services opportunities, as the integration of new applications and infrastructure gives vendors a natural starting point to build their managed services pipelines. Enhancing outsourcing capabilities by investing in engineering services and silicon design services will help vendors control the GenAI-related disruption of human-driven service delivery models and mitigate potential revenue cannibalization.
 
Vendors develop innovation capabilities in India: India remains a region of investment — from both a revenue generation and a global service delivery standpoint — as vendors strive to build relationships with local clients to diversify geographic reach. According to TBR’s Fall 2024 Global Delivery Benchmark, “investing in India remains a priority for most vendors, as the low-cost labor in the country continues to offer a way for vendors to improve profitability. The difference this time is that vendors also aspire to drive sales from within the country. Lack of native industry-skilled consultants, combined with a smaller number of industries that are ripe for digital transformation compared to Western economies, might create a profitability headwind if vendors lack the C-Suite permission and brand recognition.”
 

If you believe you have access to the full research via your employer’s enterprise license or would like to learn how to access the full research, click the Access Research button.

Access Research

 

Vendors use acquisitions to deepen functional and industry expertise and grow revenues

IT services providers are gradually accelerating acquisition activities compared to 2023 as they strive to diversify portfolios with niche expertise and expand client reach. In 3Q24 IBM used acquisitions to expand client reach across sectors and enhance capabilities.
 
During the first nine months of 2024 IBM completed three acquisitions in IBM Consulting and five acquisitions in IBM Software, supporting IBM’s strategy to expand in hybrid cloud and AI. IBM paid a collective cost of $2.8 billion. In comparison, IBM completed seven acquisitions during the first nine months of 2023 for an aggregate cost of $5 billion, approximately $4.6 billion of which was for the Apptio acquisition.
 
Accenture’s acquisition strategy remains unrivaled, with the company spending $6.6 billion on 46 transactions in FY24 (ended in August 2024), up from $2.5 billion in FY23 and $3.4 billion in FY22. The company plans to spend another $3 billion in FY25. The broad-based targets Accenture pursues highlight the company’s efforts to maintain a diversified portfolio and skill sets while ensuring it captures inorganic revenue boosts and positions itself for long-term organic revenue growth.

Industry view

While financial services is a leading revenue contributor for some of the 17 benchmarked vendors with available data, accounting for 25% of total revenue in 3Q24, revenue growth in the vertical has declined for the past three consecutive quarters. Macroeconomic headwinds in financial services subsectors, such as mortgages, asset management, investment banking, cards and payments, have been negatively affecting vendors’ performance in the sector.
 
These headwinds have been driving revenue growth deceleration for some of the vendors in the U.K. & Ireland and in North America, typically the two largest revenue-contributing geographies for IT services activities in financial services for the covered vendors. Other vendors are alleviating revenue growth pressures by ramping up activities with large banking clients in areas such as cost takeout and transformation programs.
 
Financial services will remain a leading revenue-generating segment for some of the subset of 17 benchmarked vendors with available data. TBR expects revenue growth pressures in financial services to ease in 2025, as some of the leading IT services providers in the segment, including India-centric Cognizant, TCS, Infosys, Tech Mahindra and Wipro, experienced revenue growth in 3Q24, albeit in the low single digits.
 
Such vendors are benefiting from increased interactions among financial services clients, as these clients look to drive IT modernization and optimization for efficiency and enhanced experience. Financial services is a leading revenue generator for India-centric vendors. These vendors — along with Capgemini, which has stabilized revenue growth in the sector — are optimistic about future revenue performance in financial services, as discretionary spend continues to improve among clients in the capital markets, mortgage and card processing sectors in the U.S., a trend that began in 2Q24.
 
Other vendors, such as Accenture and Kyndryl, continue to report declining revenues but are ramping up activities with alliance partners and winning new deals, which will contribute to revenue generation and help alleviate revenue growth pressures during 2025.

1H24 Cloud Data Services Market Landscape

TBR Spotlight Reports represent an excerpt of TBR’s full subscription research. Full reports and the complete data sets that underpin benchmarks, market forecasts and ecosystem reports are available as part of TBR’s subscription service. Click here to receive all new Spotlight Reports in your inbox.

Vendors lead with the data lake architecture and emerging frameworks to sell a message of data intelligence amid rampant GenAI adoption

The race for Apache Iceberg mindshare is on

Data lakes remain a valuable way for enterprises to simultaneously store structured and unstructured data, particularly as the latter increases due to generative AI (GenAI) and large language models (LLMs). Data lakes are also directly attributable to the rising popularity of Apache Iceberg, an open-source format regarded by developers for its ability to store data in tables and freely move that data across any data lake architecture.
 
Whether a customer is creating their own data lake (e.g., on Amazon Web Services [AWS]) or deploying a data lake platform as a product (e.g., Databricks), Iceberg is playing an increasingly larger role in helping customers navigate their big data estates with the most limited vendor lock-in.
 
How the two data lake giants — Snowflake and Databricks — are investing best speaks to the budding role of Apache Iceberg and its growing community. Earlier this year Snowflake adopted Apache Iceberg as the native format for its platform and subsequently launched Polaris, a tool that allows customers to catalog that data stored in Iceberg tables.
 
In only a matter of days, Databricks, which was born out of Delta Lake, an Apache Iceberg alternative, moved into the space with its acquisition of Tabular. Tabular was created by the founders of Apache Iceberg, marginalizing Snowflake’s recent investments and intent to attract more Iceberg-heavy users, which generally include digital and cloud-native companies. The hyperscalers, primarily AWS and Microsoft, work closely with Snowflake and Databricks and benefit from their respective integrations to boost interoperability for joint customers through Iceberg.
 
For example, Microsoft announced its data platform Fabric, which is based on a data lake architecture (OneLake), will support Iceberg via Snowflake. This is a major win for Snowflake that elevates the company’s role as an ISV partner in the Microsoft Fabric ecosystem and further challenges Databricks, which due to its native first-party integration with Azure, has always had a rich and unique relationship with Microsoft.

A select number of vendors are leading the shift to data intelligence

Though somewhat influenced by a degree of marketing hype vendors use to differentiate themselves, data intelligence has become an emerging topic in the market, led by GenAI. At its core data intelligence refers to the use of AI on data to deliver insights tailored to the business, but the other core component of data intelligence is the underlying data architecture foundation.
 
Databricks is largely associated with formalizing the concept of data intelligence and even markets its platform as the Data Intelligence Platform to convey the value of having both the data lakehouse architecture and the AI components (in Databrick’s case, Mosaic AI) that allow customers to build, train and fine-tune models. Other vendors have similarly adapted their messaging around data intelligence.
 
For example, as part of what it now calls its Data Intelligence vision, Oracle Analytics announced Intelligent Data Lake, a reworking of existing OCI (Oracle Cloud Infrastructure) services like cataloging and integration, to create a single abstraction layer that will support both Apache Iceberg and Delta Lake formats.
 

If you believe you have access to the full research via your employer’s enterprise license or would like to learn how to access the full research, click the Access Research button.

Access Research

 

Hyperscalers are taking different approaches to address the symbiotic relationship between data architecture and AI

Microsoft and Google Cloud are integrating and productizing their data services as complete solutions, exposing a lack of maturity in AWS’ fragmented approach

Microsoft made a big move when it launched Fabric, which essentially integrates seven disparate Azure data services — from data warehousing up to analytics — as part of a single platform underpinned by a unified data lake. Today, Fabric has amassed over 14,000 paid customers and a growing ecosystem of global systems integrators (GSIs) and ISVs building and selling applications on top of the platform.
 
Google Cloud, which has always had a strong play in data analytics, is trying to better unify key data and analytics capabilities in BigQuery to deliver a more complete, single-product experience. This includes BigLake, Google Cloud’s storage abstraction layer and services like Dataplex, so customers can apply governance tasks like lineage and profiling in Dataplex without having to leave the BigQuery interface.
 
Though Google Cloud’s approach may lack the level of integration compared to Microsoft Fabric, it is clear to see the direction the company is heading to help customers simplify their data estates, and ultimately capture more analytics and AI workloads.

AWS’ approach is different. Though offering the broadest set of data tools and services, from storage and ingestion up to governance, AWS is still lacking the platform mindset and strategy of its peers.
 
To be fair, the company has been working to better integrate services within its own ecosystem by improving data sharing between the operational database and the data warehouse (e.g., “zero-ETL” integration between Aurora and Redshift), but customers continue to stress that they have to take on more burden in the back end when crafting a data architecture on AWS.
 
This dynamic only reinforces the importance of AWS’ partnerships with complete data cloud platforms like Snowflake and Databricks, but of course Microsoft is also making sure it keeps these companies elevated within the Fabric ecosystem.

The GSIs are playing a prominent role in multiple facets of data, which could speak to maturing ecosystems and hyperscalers’ efforts to productize the entire data life cycle

Customers indicated that the GSIs play a prominent role in all aspects of the data strategy from change management to data architecture to governance. Just 12% of respondents say the GSIs were involved in their analytics stack, but this seemingly low percentage could be for many different reasons.
 
First, establishing the data architecture, or re-architecting disparate IT assets, such as data warehouses, is top of mind for many customers right now as they recognize it is a necessary step in GenAI deployment.
 
Secondly, the hyperscalers and pure play data platform companies are becoming more adept at delivering integrated solutions that deliver upper-stack capabilities, such as analytics based on a holistic data lake architecture. Microsoft Fabric, which has a growing ecosystem of both GSI and ISV partners, is a top example.
 
TBR’s newly launched Voice of the Partner Ecosystem Report found that cloud providers expect data strategy and management to be the biggest growth area coming from partners over the next two years. In fact, data strategy and management ranked higher than GenAI on its own, which is telling of what the cloud providers expect from their partners.
 

Graph: Role of GSI Partners in Data Strategy, 1H24 (Source: TBR)

Role of GSI Partners in Data Strategy (Source: TBR 1H24)

Though Informatica’s cloud-first vision will erode lucrative license and support revenue streams, the company is showing early signs in its ability to expand margins

Despite no longer selling perpetual licenses and actively migrating its support base to Information Data Management Cloud (IDMC) in the cloud, Informatica’s gross margins continue to expand.
 
Meanwhile, GAAP operating margin increased over 300 basis points year-to-year in 2Q24 as Informatica continues to benefit from economies of scale, and sign larger, more strategic contracts with customers.
 
Recognizing that it is navigating a highly competitive landscape, Snowflake’s investments in R&D are increasing. For context, Snowflake’s R&D accounts for a notable 50% of total revenue.
 

Graph: Data Cloud Platform Revenue, Growth and Profitability, 2Q24 (Source: TBR)

2Q24 Data Cloud Platform Revenue, Growth and Profitability (Source: TBR)

DOGE Federal IT Vendor Impact Series: Accenture Federal Services

The Trump administration and its Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) have generated massive upheaval across the board in federal operations, including in the federal IT segment. As of March 2025, thousands of contracts described by DOGE as “non-mission critical” have been canceled, including some across the federal IT and professional services landscape. TBR’s DOGE Federal IT Vendor Impact Series explores vendor-specific DOGE-related developments and impacts on earnings performance. Click here to receive upcoming series blogs in your inbox as soon as they’ve published.

AFS navigates DOGE disruptions: Strong 1Q25 growth amid federal IT spending cuts

Accenture Federal Services’ parent company, Accenture, released its 1Q25 (FY2Q25) earnings March 20, which included some details, albeit limited, about the impact DOGE’s cuts have had on the company’s $5-plus billion federal subsidiary. Although TBR estimates AFS’ quarterly sales in 1Q25 were $1.44 billion, up 18.3% year-to-year on a statutory basis and 7.6% on an organic basis (excluding the impact of the 2Q24 Cognosante acquisition), Accenture CEO Julie Sweet was careful to note during the company’s 1Q25 earnings call that AFS experienced delayed procurement cycles, particularly on net-new programs, during the quarter. That said, AFS’ estimated 1Q25 sales remained in line with TBR expectations.
 
TBR had projected AFS’ 1Q25 quarterly revenue would fall between $1.40 billion and $1.55 billion, implying statutory year-to-year growth of between 14.7% and 27.0% and organic year-to-year growth of between 4.0% and 16.3%. By TBR estimates, AFS achieved double-digit top-line organic growth in four of the six quarters between 4Q23 and 1Q25, and organic growth of at least 9% in the other two quarters. We anticipated the slowdown in AFS’ organic growth in 1Q25 but did not factor any DOGE-related impacts into our calculations.
 
All indications from the cohort of federal systems integrators (FSIs) tracked by TBR, as well as anecdotes from our secondary research, suggested that federal IT spending would begin to naturally cool down in federal fiscal year 2025 (FFY25) after a four-year bull market featuring unprecedented expansion of federal IT budgets and growth on behalf of the FSIs. After all, what goes up must eventually come down, but we could not have fully predicted or quantified the early impact of DOGE on AFS or the broader federal market.

TBR believes DOGE canceled nearly $93 million in potential AFS revenue across 10 DOE task orders

Sweet did not mention any specific programs culled from AFS’ book of business by DOGE’s cost-cutting actions. However, TBR is aware that in 1Q25, DOGE canceled 10 task orders on the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Chief Information Officer Business Operations Support Services 2.0 (CBOSS 2.0) blanket purchase agreement (BPA) for IT modernization and business process services. AFS was the incumbent on the first iteration of the program, CBOSS 1.0, winning the contract with the DOE in 2018.
 
AFS also secured the $3.5 billion, seven-plus-year recompete on CBOSS 2.0 in January 2025 to continue providing IT support solutions and technology and advisory services around security strategy, operations and environmental management. After AFS won this recompete, Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Leidos protested, prompting the DOE to reconsider the award and review AFS’ winning bid and subsequently leaving a major deal win on AFS’ books in protest limbo. However, we do not believe the challenge by BAH and Leidos was related in any way to the 10 canceled task orders or to DOGE.
 
The full impact of the 10 canceled task orders on AFS remains unclear, but TBR’s secondary research indicates the terminated work has a total contract value (TCV) of nearly $93 million, including a $35 million order from DOE’s CIO office and a $2 million order for geospatial services. If we assume all $93 million worth of orders was booked by AFS as the prime awardee, that sum would represent just under 2% of AFS’ estimated FY24 revenue of $5.4 billion.
 
According to TBR’s 1H25 Accenture Federal Services Vendor Profile, “We estimate Cognosante will add up to $400 million in annualized, acquired revenue to AFS’ top line after the acquisition is fully integrated in 1Q25.” Cognosante vastly enhanced AFS’ cloud migration, program management and platforms for federal IT health agencies. Acquiring Cognosante also expanded AFS’ footprint within the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). With Cognosante fully integrated as of 2Q25, and with no additional acquisitions assumed or expected in the company’s FY25 (though we believe M&A is under consideration by AFS and the other leading FSIs to offset near-term DOGE-related growth headwinds), TBR had projected AFS’ FY25 revenue would be between $5.76 billion and $5.87 billion, up between 6% and 8% on both a statutory and organic basis, at least prior to any DOGE-related impact.
 
If all $93 million in TCV for the 10 canceled CBOSS 2.0 task orders were erased from AFS’ order book, it would reduce AFS’ projected growth to between 4% and 5.5% in FY25 (assuming no other exogenous DOGE-related impacts or unexpected internal impediments to FY25 top-line growth). For context, we estimate that AFS realized double-digit year-to-year organic growth in nine of the 17 quarters between 1Q21 and 1Q25, with estimated organic growth of at least 5% in the other eight quarters.

AFS faces $75 million in additional cuts outside CBOSS 2.0

The General Service Administration (GSA) will continue to review the contracts held by AFS and nine other companies* the Trump administration instructed DOGE to initially target in an effort to cut $65 billion in consulting fees the federal government is set to pay in FFY25 and future years. According to the “DOGE-Terminated Contracts Tracker” on the GX2 website, which tracks developments in federal contracting, AFS has had a total of $75 million in contracts terminated by DOGE as of the publishing of this blog (the CBOSS 2.0 program was not among the listed cancellations).
 
Cancelled awards were with the Department of Agriculture, Department of the Interior, Social Security Administration (SSA), Department of the Treasury, Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Department of Education, and Department of Health & Human Services (HHS, which houses CMS).
 
Of the more than $16.2 billion in TCV (8,373 contracts) listed as canceled on GX2’s DOGE-Terminated Contracts Tracker, over $2.8 billion (624 individual contracts) was awarded by HHS and $1.75 billion (420 individual contracts) was awarded by the VA. If DOGE’s contract terminations continue to fall disproportionately on federal healthcare agencies, AFS may not realize the full expected value of the Cognosante acquisition and top-line growth at one of the perennial growth leaders in TBR’s Federal IT Services Benchmark since the COVID-19 pandemic will be stunted in FY25.
 
Sweet reemphasized in the company’s 1Q25 earnings call that Accenture believes its “work for federal clients is mission-critical,” but TBR is unsure if this will be sufficient to protect AFS’ revenue base from a major disruption in FY25 and FY26. Conversely, Sweet also mentioned, “We see major opportunities over time for us to help consolidate, modernize and reinvent the federal government to drive a whole new level of efficiency.”

AFS pivots to emphasize mission-critical offerings and efficiencies

We believe AFS will pursue new, longer-term opportunities in this shifting federal IT environment by emphasizing its ability to scale cloud, data and generative AI (GenAI)-based solutions agencywide to generate efficiencies, as demanded by DOGE and the Trump administration. AFS will focus on maximizing speed to solution and clearly demonstrating program ROI to prove its offerings are, in fact, mission-critical.
 
We also expect AFS to double down on advisory services related to resource management, cultural and operational change management, and risk management — critical precursors to federal digital transformations. AFS’ previous investments in AI-enhanced service delivery will be a significant advantage compared to its peers with less mature internal AI capabilities, enabling AFS to showcase how its internal application of AI technologies has optimized operations. AFS’ AI-enhanced service delivery will also enable the company to generate more cost-competitive bids and meet increasingly aggressive IT project timelines for federal digital IT modernization programs.

*BAH, CGI Federal, Deloitte Consulting, General Dynamics IT (GDIT), Guidehouse, HII Mission Technologies, IBM, Leidos and SAIC

 

TBR’s DOGE Federal IT Impact Series will include analysis of Accenture Federal Services, General Dynamics Technologies, CACI, IBM, CGI, Leidos, IFC International, Maximus, Booz Allen Hamilton and SAIC. Click here to download a preview of our federal IT research and receive upcoming series blogs in your inbox as soon as they’ve published.