PwC Stepping Up When Technology Fails to Deliver Value

In late November 2023, TBR and PwC Transformation Consulting Solutions Leader Tom Puthiyamadam continued a decadelong discussion about the consulting business model, reflecting on changes wrought by the pandemic, technology ecosystem partnerships and generative AI (GenAI).  According to PwC’s assessment, technology investments have not delivered the business value or transformative effects enterprises have expected over the last decade. Implementing the latest ERP does not, in itself, deliver growth, and moving workloads to the cloud does not, unrelentingly, reduce costs. Just as commuters have not taken off in the flying cars that “The Jetsons” promised, business leaders have not seen technology provide transformational results.

Technology Is Easier to Use but Harder to Make Useful — and Still No Flying Cars

For PwC, a new year and a hot new technology, GenAI, provide an opportunity to reassess how consultancies and IT services vendors bring value to their clients, first by defining credible, meaningful business outcomes and then creating a value chain back into the technology, process and operations stacks. What does that actually mean? According to Puthiyamadam and other PwC leaders involved in the discussions with TBR, the starting point is defining business value transformation — a desired end state — and then delivering on trust, transparency and speed.

 

Taking the 10,000-foot view, PwC leaders noted that technology as a whole has been getting easier, perhaps even more so now in the GenAI age. No-code and low-code platforms, visualizations, and GenAI-enabled programs like Microsoft’s Copilot all support a trend toward making technology easier to understand and deploy.

 

Notably, in Puthiyamadam’s words, “The old hard part is still the hard part. Can you stitch it all together? Can you get people to work differently? Can you drive behavioral changes in an enterprise?” And most critically, can a consultancy “deliver on CFO-level outcomes in 12 weeks, not 12 months?”

 

Repeatedly, PwC Consulting leaders came back to a fundamental point around how clients view consultancies: How fast can they deliver measurable, meaningful outcomes? Experience, expertise, technology skills and even scale are table stakes. Speed, combined with quality and at a fair price, matters most.
 

IT services and consulting in 2024: Traversing GenAI pressures, talent challenges and regulatory wavesDownload Your Free Copy of TBR’s Top Predictions for IT Services and Consulting Markets in 2024, featuring expert insights into GenAI’s impact on outcomes-based pricing and the major pain point for all in the new year

  

NASCAR and the Factory Approach: What PwC Can Do Differently

Embracing what PwC leaders have called a “factory approach” to technology-infused professional services engagements allows PwC to reassure clients that the firm is purpose-built when it comes to people, scale, expertise and price.

 

Critically, PwC reassures clients’ IT professionals that the firm provides advisory and support services, availability, and integrated technologies but does not wholly replace those IT professionals’ roles within their organization.

 

In TBR’s view, PwC’s recognition that a standardized, scaled business model — the factory approach — combined with high-touch consulting could actually assuage fears around job disruption may prove critical in coming years as GenAI permeates IT services, generating more uncertainty and fear. Paired with the focus on measurable business outcomes, PwC’s factory approach could help separate the firm from peers.

 

During the discussions with TBR, PwC leaders acknowledged that many enterprise clients struggle with technical debt but challenged the idea that this debt constitutes the biggest obstacle to realizing digital transformation value. Instead, PwC suggested process debt — the ingrained operational tasks, flows and interdependencies — has also accumulated at enterprises, slowing efforts to gain value from the technology (digital) or the business (transformation) investments in digital transformation.

 

PwC leaders further suggested process debt at many enterprises had reached levels that demand attention, even at the cost of additional technical debt. Here, according to PwC, the firm helps clients gain maximum use from current technology investments, finding additional value while accelerating transformation to new (and better) processes with, as needed, new technologies.

 

In TBR’s view, a NASCAR pit crew analogy Puthiyamadam invoked multiple times seemed most appropriate in discussing how PwC could help clients with both their processes and technology. Changing tires fast requires not just better tools but also practice, teamwork and performing under pressure. In an increasingly competitive and budget-constrained IT services and consulting market, bringing NASCAR-like precision and speed to digital transformations will be expected of leading vendors.

Business Value Realization and the Art of Keeping Everyone Honest

Speeding and crashing provides no value on the track or to a business, bringing into play the other two elements PwC sees as critical to a new way of framing consulting: trust and transparency. PwC leaders told TBR that the firm has increasingly been bringing a private equity mindset to its clients’ value realization.

 

Rather than taking three years to fully understand the value of a technology-enabled change, PwC and its clients have been constantly examining ongoing work, determining on a monthly basis whether the expected value continues to be reflected in current progress. The transparency around business value realization — critically here actual measurable business value, not just technology milestones — builds trust and enables speed. PwC has had to reorient its ways of working, reinvigorate its technology training, and build the business model agility to take on financial risks as a way of “keeping everyone honest,” in Puthiyamadam’s assessment.

 

As he pointed out, PwC can help with “modernizing the core while improving the business, realizing value from existing technology. … The client can hit ‘pause’ if they’re not believing [PwC is] going to hit value.”

 

Further on PwC itself, PwC leaders reiterated to TBR that the firm has been training strategists on emerging technologies, an effort that began globally years ago with the Digital Fitness app and has continued to be a learning and development priority. Assessing management consulting overall, Puthiyamadam stated that consultants who are not “trilingual will be irrelevant really soon, if not already. Design, business value, and technology. Must speak all three.”

 

Critically, PwC leaders in the discussion added that the firm’s consultants focused on working within the existing technology stack at their clients, accepting the technology environment that they are in and recognizing that perfect is the enemy of progress. Combining what PwC does for itself and what it brings clients, PwC leaders further elaborated that as clients bring new technologies into their IT stack those clients need the full suite of change management, learning and professional development, and product management critical to successful technology deployments.

 

In TBR’s view, the near-term disruptions in the management consulting and IT services space will require many traditional services — ones that PwC has experience with and credibility around, in part by applying those services directly to the firm.

Does PwC Have the New Consulting Business Model? If So, TBR Is Here for It

TBR might not be quite as gloomy as some of PwC’s consulting leaders on the failures of technology to date — we may yet see flying taxis in Paris next summer — but we agree fully that most enterprise information technology has been oversold and has under-delivered in terms of overall business value. PwC’s focus on getting the most from technology that clients have already acquired and addressing process debt, those sticky business problems that prevent the full value of technology or digital transformation from taking hold, all while delivering value quickly and transparently strikes TBR as a smart strategy to address an ecosystemwide problem.

 

There is an old saying, “You can have it fast or good or cheap, but not all three.” PwC is challenging that formulation by saying you can have fast and good, and you will always know what you are paying for and what you are getting, even in a previously nebulously defined area like management consulting. And to back it up, PwC will put its own fees at risk, knowing that value will be evaluated every three months, at least, if not more frequently.

 

To TBR, this approach echoes the recent attention around financial operations, in which enterprise IT buyers ask how much value they are getting from software, platforms and cloud. At frequent intervals, PwC assesses the value it is bringing to clients with no further steps and no further action until the expected value is understood and credibly on track. Is PwC disrupting the consulting business model? In TBR’s view, there is no better time for it.

Reliable, Proven and High-functioning: HCLTech’s Cloud-native and GenAI Labs

HCLTech considers the “art of the possible” to be what clients can deploy at scale in the near term. In HCLTech’s Cloud Native Labs, “the possible” is grounded completely in what can be done, not what is theoretically possible. In a decade of visiting innovation and transformation centers, TBR has heard every version of blue-sky creativity and out-of-the-box thinking but cannot recall another IT services vendor definitively connecting “the possible” to “deployable at scale.” 

Grounding the ‘Art of the Possible’

Gracechurch Street Cloud Native Lab Echoes HCLTech’s Fundamentals

In fall 2023, TBR met with Alan Flower, EVP, CTO and global head, Cloud Native & AI Labs; Tom De Vos, Google Cloud Platform (GCP) cloud native architect; and Mani Nagasundaram, global head of Cloud Sales, Financial Services, at HCLTech’s Gracechurch Street Cloud Native Lab, one of a network of HCLTech’s worldwide labs, including a Software Defined Infrastructure Lab in Chennai, India, and a Scale Digital Delivery Center and Digital Innovation Lab in Amsterdam.
 
The HCLTech leaders described in detail the kinds of challenges clients bring to them in the labs as well as why clients come to HCLTech. In use case after use case, the following three elements in HCLTech’s approach in the labs and overall approach to technology and IT services resonated with TBR particularly well based on our experience and view of HCLTech’s peers and ecosystem partners:

 

  • Engineering credibility — HCLTech has always stood out among the large India-centric IT services vendors for its engineering DNA, a mindset that seems to permeate every aspect of the company’s solutions and engagements. Flower first mentioned his company’s engineering legacy in the context of how his teams approach clients’ problems. Then De Vos described a critical element in HCLTech’s engagements at the labs, saying that clients know they are going to be able to “flip a switch” and have a working, materially important solution, not just a PowerPoint presentation or road map.
  • Sustained engagement — HCLTech’s leaders repeatedly described client engagements that extended over multiple lab visits, whether on-site, virtual, or even set up in the client’s facility. While client selection — who comes to the labs and for what kinds of work — is not handled lightly, HCLTech clearly maintains flexibility with respect to how clients can tap into the time and expertise of the HCLTech professionals at the various labs worldwide, reflecting the company’s desire and ability to deliver on client objectives with its portfolio and resources over relying entirely on transactional volume.
  • Commitment to relationships — For HCLTech, delivering on client objectives includes keeping the Cloud Native Labs and the entire labs network part of the relationship beyond the contract. Flower repeatedly noted that the labs function as an asset that HCLTech can bring to clients to jump-start problem solving and move from strategic decisions around technology choices and approaches to the training and cultural change management needed to sustain a solution beyond the MVP and pilot stages. That commitment came through in both the use cases Flower described and HCLTech’s understanding that these labs are decidedly not a direct revenue generation source but a critical component to HCLTech’s overall strategy.

 

Technology-centric Cultural Change Management

While HCLTech’s Cloud Native Labs share many attributes with other innovation and transformation centers, including the need to showcase capabilities, challenges managing which clients attend sessions, and opportunities for internal training and skills development, TBR believes these labs could be a blueprint for other IT services vendors, particularly as the entire cloud ecosystem faces disruptions from shifting client expectations and the opportunities around generative AI (GenAI).
 
No client arrives at a consultancy’s or IT services vendor’s innovation and transformation center completely unaware of emerging technologies, nor do any enterprises have blank slate or pristine technology environments. So when informed clients potentially laden with technology debt arrive at HCLTech’s Cloud Native Labs, the shared mandate to get to a deployable-at-scale solution to a clearly defined (and addressable) problem likely resonates extremely well with clients, in large part because HCLTech continues to engage most frequently with technologists and practitioners, the people tasked with making the tech work at an enterprise.
 
That said, Flower and De Vos repeatedly noted that HCLTech understands the cultural change management needed for any technology solution to scale. Consulting, yes, but within the context of HCLTech’s engineering and technology-problem-solving strengths.

Partnering with the Right Hyperscaler — All 3 of Them

Putting HCLTech’s Cloud Native Labs in context of other consulting and IT services vendors’ innovation and transformation centers necessarily sets aside the cloud focus of these labs. On that point, Flower and De Vos consistently stressed the importance of HCLTech’s hyperscaler partners, including (in no particular order), Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT), Amazon Web Services (AWS) (Nasdaq: AMZN) and Google (Nasdaq: GOOGL).
 
Notably, HCLTech partners closely with RedHat, and the HCLTech executives repeatedly referenced use cases that featured Red Hat’s and IBM’s (NYSE: IBM) technologies. As TBR has previously examined, how consultancies and IT services vendors manage their ecosystem partners at their innovation and transformation centers (and labs) reveals differences in strategic thinking and intent.
 
While full-on branding remains rare and having technology partners’ staff permanently on-site is even more rare, consultancies and IT services vendors have become adept at including technology partners as part of clients’ experiences, almost always when the client has already committed to a particular tech stack (ask us about what happens when a particular Germany-based ERP partner is not in the room). HCLTech remains committed to partnering with a broad ecosystem, following leads from its clients and undoubtedly serving those clients well.
 
Had Flower and De Vos not shared a use case in which a hyperscaler specifically recommended HCLTech to a client — suggesting Flower, De Vos and the rest of the team were best positioned to help the client solve their cloud-related problems — TBR would have questioned how successfully HCLTech balanced being cloud vendor agnostic with meeting clients where they are in terms of their existing technology environments and needs. That a cloud vendor could definitively recommend HCLTech to a client indicates HCLTech, aided by the sustained investment in Cloud Native Labs, has made a compelling case to the cloud vendors.
 
One further note on cloud partners: TBR persistently pushed Flower and De Vos to distinguish between Microsoft Azure, AWS and Google Cloud Platform and detail differences in HCLTech’s alliances. While refusing to pick favorites, the HCLTech leaders described multiple use cases involving each partner, demonstrating a breadth of client challenges and HCLTech solutions and establishing a credibility around HCLTech’s cloud-agnostic strategy.

Cannot Have GenAI Without Cloud (and Cannot Talk Tech Without GenAI)

One cannot have a technology-centric meeting without discussing GenAI. TBR and HCLTech’s Cloud Native Lab leaders shared mostly synchronized views on the implications and opportunities around GenAI, agreeing that infrastructure players and consultancies should see immediate spikes in engagements and revenues. Long term, HCLTech’s focus on security, responsible AI and intimate collaboration with hyperscalers should prove beneficial.
 
Notably, HCLTech also maintains strategic partnerships with Dell Technologies (NYSE: Dell) and Intel (Nasdaq: INTC), two technology vendors that are well positioned to provide the necessary infrastructure to a GenAI adoption wave. Overall, HCLTech’s sobriety around GenAI struck TBR as refreshingly honest. In a setting conducive to blue-sky ideas and bleeding-edge technology musings, HCLTech’s Cloud Native Lab leaders kept the discussion grounded.
 
In a TBR blog, we discussed how GenAI will likely affect IT services vendors like HCLTech: “When looking at the IT services and professional services space, TBR considers two GenAI tracks: What opportunities will vendors seize for generating new revenues, and what changes will GenAI force on how vendors operate? Currently, the first track is pretty straightforward: Fear, uncertainty and doubt around GenAI — fueled by massive hype — create consulting opportunities, particularly for vendors with established governance, risk and compliance offerings.
 
Every vendor has core artificial intelligence, data orchestration, analytics and cloud capabilities, so no vendor can credibly separate itself from the pack with those tools alone. … On the second track, GenAI could be highly disruptive, especially around managed services, to include changes to the staffing pyramid, as less experienced employees either shift to higher-value tasks or leave.”
 
Reflecting on the GenAI discussion with Flower and De Vos, TBR believes HCLTech could begin to separate itself from IT services peers by emphasizing a grounded practicality mindset and a focus on bringing real solutions to scale, even when discussing the potential disruptions of GenAI.

Being Productive in a Time of Chaos and Uncertainty

Grounded and concrete. Partnering smartly and focused on what can possibly scale within clients’ existing or near-term environment. In TBR’s view, HCLTech’s Cloud Native Labs have positioned themselves well for what will likely be an exceptionally turbulent time in the cloud and IT services space. HCLTech effectively uses the Cloud Native Labs as a platform to showcase its plethora of products from the HCLSoftware division and helps clients integrate the same into the overall solution architecture.
 
Clients’ dissatisfaction with costs and unbridled enthusiasm for GenAI will create unrealistic expectations. Competitive pressures around IT services and hyperscalers’ need to find growth will challenge pricing and engagement models. HCLTech has a reliable, proven, highly functioning cloud lab ecosystem that should be a safe space for clients, technology partners and HCLTech professionals to productively manage through the coming craziness.
 
TBR will highlight HCLTech’s Cloud Native Labs in the next Innovation and Transformation Centers Market Landscape and continue to cover the company in quarterly reports, TBR’s IT Services Benchmark, and in 2024 in TBR’s Cloud Ecosystems Market Landscape.